Literature DB >> 24564708

Informed public choices for low-carbon electricity portfolios using a computer decision tool.

Lauren A Fleishman Mayer1, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, M Granger Morgan.   

Abstract

Reducing CO2 emissions from the electricity sector will likely require policies that encourage the widespread deployment of a diverse mix of low-carbon electricity generation technologies. Public discourse informs such policies. To make informed decisions and to productively engage in public discourse, citizens need to understand the trade-offs between electricity technologies proposed for widespread deployment. Building on previous paper-and-pencil studies, we developed a computer tool that aimed to help nonexperts make informed decisions about the challenges faced in achieving a low-carbon energy future. We report on an initial usability study of this interactive computer tool. After providing participants with comparative and balanced information about 10 electricity technologies, we asked them to design a low-carbon electricity portfolio. Participants used the interactive computer tool, which constrained portfolio designs to be realistic and yield low CO2 emissions. As they changed their portfolios, the tool updated information about projected CO2 emissions, electricity costs, and specific environmental impacts. As in the previous paper-and-pencil studies, most participants designed diverse portfolios that included energy efficiency, nuclear, coal with carbon capture and sequestration, natural gas, and wind. Our results suggest that participants understood the tool and used it consistently. The tool may be downloaded from http://cedmcenter.org/tools-for-cedm/informing-the-public-about-low-carbon-technologies/ .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24564708     DOI: 10.1021/es403473x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Eliciting probabilistic expectations: Collaborations between psychologists and economists.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reflections on an interdisciplinary collaboration to inform public understanding of climate change, mitigation, and impacts.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How the public imagines the energy future: Exploring and clustering non-experts' techno-economic expectations towards the future energy system.

Authors:  Lukas Braunreiter; Michael Stauffacher; Yann Benedict Blumer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Developing citizen report cards for primary health care in low and middle-income countries: Results from cognitive interviews in rural Tajikistan.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauhoff; Lila Rabinovich; Lauren A Mayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.