Literature DB >> 24563639

The properties of the "ideal" donor site dressing: results of a worldwide online survey.

P Kamolz L P Lars1, M Giretzlehner2, M Trop3, D Parvizi1, S Spendel1, M Schintler1, I Justich1, M Wiedner1, C Laback1, D B Lumenta1.   

Abstract

Split skin grafting is a widely used technique for reconstructing skin defects. Although a vast number of different coverage options for donor sites have become available in daily clinical practice, no optimum dressing material has been found to date. For this reason, we conducted a globally-distributed online survey to poll for the properties of such an "ideal" donor site dressing, possibly leading to an improved clinically-driven direction of future wound dressing developments. A total of 69 respondents from 34 countries took part in the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 13.8% (69/500) over a 1-month period. The majority of respondents rated the characteristics of an "ideal" donor site dressing to be either "essential" or "desirable" as follows: lack of adhesion to the wound bed ("essential": 31/69, 44.9%; "desirable": 30/69, 43.5%); pain-free dressing changes ("essential": 38/69, 55.1%; "desirable": 30/69, 43.5%); absorbency ("essential": 27/69, 39.1%; "desirable": 33/69, 47.8%); ease of removal ("essential": 37/69, 53.6%; "desirable": 27/69, 39.13%). With regard to the desired frequency of dressing changes, respondents preferred "no dressing change until the donor site has healed" (51/69, 73.9%) in the majority of cases, followed by "twice weekly" (10/69, 14.5%), "alternate days" (5/69, 7.2%) and "daily" (3/69, 4.3%). With regard to the design of the dressing material, the majority of participants preferred a one-piece (composite) dressing product (44/69, 63.8%). The majority of respondents also denied the current availability of an "ideal" donor site dressing (49/69, 71%). The strength of this study was the remarkable geographic distribution of responses; all parts of the world were included and participated. We believe that this globally conducted online survey has polled for the properties of the "ideal" donor site dressing and possibly will lead to an improved clinically-driven direction of future wound dressing development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donor site; dressing; internet; online; survey

Year:  2013        PMID: 24563639      PMCID: PMC3917148     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters        ISSN: 1592-9558


  25 in total

1.  Split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: preliminary results of a controlled, clinical comparative study of MEBO and Sofra-Tulle.

Authors:  B S Atiyeh; G Ghanimeh; I L Kaddoura; J Ioannovich; C A Al-Amm
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Scar quality and physiologic barrier function restoration after moist and moist-exposed dressings of partial-thickness wounds.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; Kusai A El-Musa; Ruwayda Dham
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Simon De Lusignan; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 4.  A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Mark Duffett; Michelle E Kho; Maureen O Meade; Neill K J Adhikari; Tasnim Sinuff; Deborah J Cook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The properties of an "ideal" burn wound dressing--what do we need in daily clinical practice? Results of a worldwide online survey among burn care specialists.

Authors:  Harald F Selig; David B Lumenta; Michael Giretzlehner; Marc G Jeschke; Dominic Upton; Lars P Kamolz
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 6.  Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Olubimpe A Ayeni; Leslie McKnight; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Reduced length of stay in hospital for burn patients following a change in practice guidelines: financial implications.

Authors:  Leigh A Jansen; Sally L Hynes; Sheina A Macadam; Anthony Papp
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Comparison of donor-site healing under Xeroform and Jelonet dressings: unexpected findings.

Authors:  Kristian G Malpass; Charles F T Snelling; Victor Tron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Sara Khangura; Jamie C Brehaut; Ian D Graham; David Moher; Beth K Potter; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  4 in total

1.  Grafting both acute wound site and adjacent donor site with the same graft: an easy and safe procedure to improve healing and minimize pain in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  C Keilani; D Agard; A Duhoux; A Lakhel; O Giraud; M Brachet; P Duhamel; E Bey
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-03-31

2.  Management of split skin graft donor site in the West African sub region: survey of plastic surgeons' practice.

Authors:  O A Olawoye; S A Ademola; A O Iyun; A I Michael; O M Oluwatosin
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-06-30

3.  Three donor site dressings in pediatric split-thickness skin grafts: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Craig A McBride; Roy M Kimble; Kellie Stockton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of Algisite™ M, Cuticerin™, and Sorbact® as donor site dressings in paediatric split-thickness skin grafts.

Authors:  Craig A McBride; Roy M Kimble; Kellie A Stockton
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-11-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.