Literature DB >> 22337321

Reduced length of stay in hospital for burn patients following a change in practice guidelines: financial implications.

Leigh A Jansen1, Sally L Hynes, Sheina A Macadam, Anthony Papp.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the financial implications of the implementation of new institutional practice guidelines including greater outpatient care and earlier operative intervention in a provincial burn center. A retrospective review was performed including all patients admitted to the Burn Unit with burns up to 20% TBSA between August 2005 and July 2009, including 2 years before and after the new guidelines were introduced. Daily costs for the burn unit were used to calculate this portion of cost. Length of stay (LOS) was based on actual data and representative clinical scenarios. Two hundred sixty-four patients were included. Mean LOS decreased from 10.3 to 3.9 (P < .01) and 21.0 to 13.3 (P > .05) for nonoperative burns 0 to 10% and 10 to 20% TBSA, respectively. Mean LOS for operative burns decreased from 16.6 to 12.9 and 32.3 to 29.8 days for 0 to 10% and 10 to 20% TBSA, respectively (P > .05). Burn patient management requires significant financial resources, and LOS has a large impact on cost. Given per diem rates of Can$1,663, scenario analysis shows potential cost savings of Can$19,956 per patient for operative and nonoperative burns <20% TBSA. With an average of 66 such patients treated each year, potential annual cost savings are Can$1.3 million. If outcomes are not compromised, earlier operative management and greater outpatient care can translate into significant cost savings. A prospective analysis capturing all costs and patient quality of life is required for further assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22337321     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31824d1acb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  5 in total

Review 1.  The properties of the "ideal" donor site dressing: results of a worldwide online survey.

Authors:  P Kamolz L P Lars; M Giretzlehner; M Trop; D Parvizi; S Spendel; M Schintler; I Justich; M Wiedner; C Laback; D B Lumenta
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2013-09-30

2.  Scald management protocols - outcome differences in two different time periods using different treatment strategies.

Authors:  M Elmasry; I Steinvall; J Thorfinn; A H Abbas; O A Adly; I Abdelrahman; M A Nagi; F Sjoberg
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 3.  Burns in Israel: Etiologic, Demographic, and Clinical trends-A 9-Year Updated Comprehensive Study, 2004-2010 versus 2011-2019.

Authors:  Irit Cohen-Manheim; Moti Harats; Sharon Goldman; Dmitry Beylin; Josef Haik; Moran Bodas; Adi Givon; Rachel Kornhaber; Yehiel Hayun; Michelle Cleary; Daniel Hilewitz; Ariel Tessone
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  A 3-Year Review of an Outpatient Burn Sedation Program in a Tertiary Burn Care Centre: Is It Safe and Does It Work?

Authors:  Rayleigh Chan; Aaron C Van Slyke; Marija Bucevska; Cynthia Verchere
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-09-22       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Epidemiological and cost analysis of burn injuries admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary burn center.

Authors:  Tolga Eser; Cemil Kavalci; Cem Aydogan; Afsin Emre Kayipmaz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.