Literature DB >> 24563535

Improved normalization of systematic biases affecting ion current measurements in label-free proteomics data.

Paul A Rudnick1, Xia Wang, Xinjian Yan, Nell Sedransk, Stephen E Stein.   

Abstract

Normalization is an important step in the analysis of quantitative proteomics data. If this step is ignored, systematic biases can lead to incorrect assumptions about regulation. Most statistical procedures for normalizing proteomics data have been borrowed from genomics where their development has focused on the removal of so-called 'batch effects.' In general, a typical normalization step in proteomics works under the assumption that most peptides/proteins do not change; scaling is then used to give a median log-ratio of 0. The focus of this work was to identify other factors, derived from knowledge of the variables in proteomics, which might be used to improve normalization. Here we have examined the multi-laboratory data sets from Phase I of the NCI's CPTAC program. Surprisingly, the most important bias variables affecting peptide intensities within labs were retention time and charge state. The magnitude of these observations was exaggerated in samples of unequal concentrations or "spike-in" levels, presumably because the average precursor charge for peptides with higher charge state potentials is lower at higher relative sample concentrations. These effects are consistent with reduced protonation during electrospray and demonstrate that the physical properties of the peptides themselves can serve as good reporters of systematic biases. Between labs, retention time, precursor m/z, and peptide length were most commonly the top-ranked bias variables, over the standardly used average intensity (A). A larger set of variables was then used to develop a stepwise normalization procedure. This statistical model was found to perform as well or better on the CPTAC mock biomarker data than other commonly used methods. Furthermore, the method described here does not require a priori knowledge of the systematic biases in a given data set. These improvements can be attributed to the inclusion of variables other than average intensity during normalization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563535      PMCID: PMC4014289          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.030593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  16 in total

1.  Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Silva; Marc V Gorenstein; Guo-Zhong Li; Johannes P C Vissers; Scott J Geromanos
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 2.  An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data.

Authors:  Lukas N Mueller; Mi-Youn Brusniak; D R Mani; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Accurate inclusion mass screening: a bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification.

Authors:  Jacob D Jaffe; Hasmik Keshishian; Betty Chang; Theresa A Addona; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Batch effects correction improves the sensitivity of significance tests in spectral counting-based comparative discovery proteomics.

Authors:  Josep Gregori; Laura Villarreal; Olga Méndez; Alex Sánchez; José Baselga; Josep Villanueva
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Development and evaluation of normalization methods for label-free relative quantification of endogenous peptides.

Authors:  Kim Kultima; Anna Nilsson; Birger Scholz; Uwe L Rossbach; Maria Fälth; Per E Andrén
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  A statistical selection strategy for normalization procedures in LC-MS proteomics experiments through dataset-dependent ranking of normalization scaling factors.

Authors:  Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Melissa M Matzke; Jon M Jacobs; Joel G Pounds; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 7.  Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; Robert B Scharpf; Héctor Corrada Bravo; David Simcha; Benjamin Langmead; W Evan Johnson; Donald Geman; Keith Baggerly; Rafael A Irizarry
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics.

Authors:  Shao-En Ong; Blagoy Blagoev; Irina Kratchmarova; Dan Bach Kristensen; Hanno Steen; Akhilesh Pandey; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Global rank-invariant set normalization (GRSN) to reduce systematic distortions in microarray data.

Authors:  Carl R Pelz; Molly Kulesz-Martin; Grover Bagby; Rosalie C Sears
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses.

Authors:  Paul A Rudnick; Karl R Clauser; Lisa E Kilpatrick; Dmitrii V Tchekhovskoi; Pedatsur Neta; Niksa Blonder; Dean D Billheimer; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Amy-Joan L Ham; Jacob D Jaffe; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Birgit Schilling; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  11 in total

1.  Peptide-level Robust Ridge Regression Improves Estimation, Sensitivity, and Specificity in Data-dependent Quantitative Label-free Shotgun Proteomics.

Authors:  Ludger J E Goeminne; Kris Gevaert; Lieven Clement
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  DeMix-Q: Quantification-Centered Data Processing Workflow.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Lukas Käll; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Proteomic Interrogation in Cancer Biomarker.

Authors:  Un-Beom Kang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Learning and Imputation for Mass-spec Bias Reduction (LIMBR).

Authors:  Alexander M Crowell; Casey S Greene; Jennifer J Loros; Jay C Dunlap
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Guoshou Teo; Sinae Kim; Chih-Chiang Tsou; Ben Collins; Anne-Claude Gingras; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Hyungwon Choi
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Penicillium echinulatum secretome analysis reveals the fungi potential for degradation of lignocellulosic biomass.

Authors:  Willian Daniel Hahn Schneider; Thiago Augusto Gonçalves; Cristiane Akemi Uchima; Matthew Brian Couger; Rolf Prade; Fabio Marcio Squina; Aldo José Pinheiro Dillon; Marli Camassola
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 7.  What is Normalization? The Strategies Employed in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Proteome Analysis Workflows.

Authors:  Matthew B O'Rourke; Stephanie E L Town; Penelope V Dalla; Fiona Bicknell; Naomi Koh Belic; Jake P Violi; Joel R Steele; Matthew P Padula
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2019-08-22

8.  ICan: an optimized ion-current-based quantification procedure with enhanced quantitative accuracy and sensitivity in biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Chengjian Tu; Quanhu Sheng; Jun Li; Xiaomeng Shen; Ming Zhang; Yu Shyr; Jun Qu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  An Optimized Framework for Cancer Prediction Using Immunosignature.

Authors:  Fatemeh Safaei Firouzabadi; Alireza Vard; Mohammadreza Sehhati; Mohammadreza Mohebian
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

10.  Bioinformatics Analysis of Genes and Pathways of CD11b+/Ly6Cintermediate Macrophages after Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Dong Sun; Xin Wan; Bin-Bin Pan; Qing Sun; Xiao-Bing Ji; Feng Zhang; Hao Zhang; Chang-Chun Cao
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.