Literature DB >> 24563274

Pneumococcal empyema and complicated pneumonias: global trends in incidence, prevalence, and serotype epidemiology.

M A Fletcher1, H-J Schmitt, M Syrochkina, G Sylvester.   

Abstract

This review evaluates the serotype epidemiology of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia (CPP) during the period 1990-2012. PubMed and EMBASE were searched using the terms "empyema", "complicated pneumonia", "pleural infection", "necrotizing pneumonia", "pleural effusion", "parapneumonic effusion", "pneumatocele", or "lung abscess"; "pneumococcal" or "Streptococcus pneumoniae"; and "serotype" for studies on the epidemiology of complicated pneumonias published from January 1, 1990 to October 1, 2013. Studies with data on incidence and serotypes were included; reviews, case reports, and conference abstracts were excluded. Of 152 papers, 84 fitted the inclusion criteria. A few pneumococcal serotypes were predominant causes of CPP, particularly serotypes 1, 19A, 3, 14, and 7F. CPP was a more common manifestation of pneumococcal disease among older (>2 years old) than younger children. The data support increases in both reported incidence rates and proportions of CPP in children and adults during the period 1990-2012; specific increases varied by geographic region. The proportions of serotype 3 and, particularly in Asia, serotype 19A CPP have increased, whereas most studies show declines in serotype 14. Serotype 1 has been a predominant cause of CPP since 1990, while antibiotic resistance was infrequent among serotype 1 isolates. The reported incidence and proportions of CPP among pneumonia cases steadily increased from 1990 to 2012. Several factors might account for these increases, including enhanced disease detection due to a higher index of suspicion, more sophisticated diagnostic assays, and changes in the prevalence of serotypes with capacity to invade the pleural space that were not targeted by the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563274      PMCID: PMC4110404          DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2062-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


Introduction

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of pneumonia in children and a major cause of pneumonia in adults worldwide [1, 2]. Among patients with pneumonia, as many as half may develop pleural effusions (i.e., fluid in the pleural space); of these, 5–10 % may progress to empyema [3]. In general, “complicated pneumonia” refers to pneumonia accompanied by pleural effusion. Empyema is a serious complication characterized by pus and bacteria in the pleural space [3, 4], which may progress to necrosis, cavitation, or fistulas in the thoracic cavity. S. pneumoniae is the most common cause of complicated pneumonia in children and a common cause in adults [5, 6]. Other bacteria associated with acute complicated pneumonias include S. pyogenes, S. milleri, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, other Streptococcus species, and, less commonly, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Salmonella, and Yersinia species [5]. The reported incidence and proportion of cases of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia (CPP) in children and adults have increased in recent decades [7-19]. This trend has been described both before and after the introduction in 2000 of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7; serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F conjugated to CRM197) for pediatric vaccination. A 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) containing pneumococcal capsular polysaccharides (serotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 8, 9N, 9V, 10A, 11A, 12F, 14, 15B, 17F, 18C, 19A, 19F, 20, 22F, 23F, and 33F) was introduced in 1983 for the vaccination of children and adolescents at high risk of pneumococcal disease, but primarily older adults. Unlike the pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, PPV23 is not approved for children aged <2 years. PPV23 in adults has been shown to have an impact on bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, but not all-cause pneumonia [20, 21]. More recently, the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10; serotypes 1, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, and 23F conjugated to non-typeable H. influenza protein D, serotype 18C conjugated to tetanus toxoid, and serotype 19F conjugated to diphtheria toxoid) and the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13; serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, and 23F conjugated to CRM197) were introduced beginning in 2009 (Table 1).
Table 1

Pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine approval history for the countries included in this review (Pfizer, data on file)

CountryVaccineStart of the immunization programa
North America
CanadaPCV72001b
PCV132010
USAPCV72000
PCV132010
South America
MexicoPCV72007
PCV132010
UruguayPCV72008
PCV132010
Europe
FrancePCV72006
PCV132010
GermanyPCV72006c
PCV102009c
PCV132009c
ItalyPCV72005–2007b
PCV132010
PortugalPCV72006d
PCV132009
SpainPCV72002–2006d 2006–2009b
PCV132010b
TurkeyPCV72008
PCV132011
UKPCV72006
PCV132010
Middle East/North Africa
IsraelPCV72009
PCV132010e
Asia-Pacific
AustraliaPCV72001f
PCV132010
ChinaPCV72008g
PCV13No
IndiaPCV72010d
PCV132012d
PhilippinesPCV7No
PCV102012
PCV132013
SingaporePCV7No
PCV132011
South KoreaPCV72003d
PCV132010d
TaiwanPCV72005d
PCV132011d
VietnamPCV7No
PCV13No

PCV7, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV10, 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

aDates refer to a national immunization program, unless otherwise specified

bYear of introduction into immunization programs varied by province

cPhysician choice program

dPrivate market only

eSwitched to PCV13 in November 2010

fIncluded in the national immunization program in 2005

gRegional (city) mass vaccination programs

Pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine approval history for the countries included in this review (Pfizer, data on file) PCV7, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV10, 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine aDates refer to a national immunization program, unless otherwise specified bYear of introduction into immunization programs varied by province cPhysician choice program dPrivate market only eSwitched to PCV13 in November 2010 fIncluded in the national immunization program in 2005 gRegional (city) mass vaccination programs A limited number of pneumococcal serotypes have been associated with CPP and pneumococcal empyema (PnEmp). Changes in the serotype epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumococcal pneumonia have been reported in recent years, with significant declines in incidence and in the proportion of disease caused by PCV7 serotypes and increases in the proportion of non-PCV7 serotype disease [22-27]. Although these changes are suggestive of serotype replacement, similar trends have also been reported in some countries prior to the introduction of PCV7 [28, 29, 68]. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the serotype epidemiology of CPP during the period 1990–2012.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies on the epidemiology and incidence of CPP published from January 1, 1990 through October 1, 2013 using the terms: “empyema”, “complicated pneumonia”, “pleural infection”, “necrotizing pneumonia”, “pleural effusion”, “parapneumonic effusion”, “pneumatocele”, or “lung abscess”; “pneumococcal” or “Streptococcus pneumoniae”; and “serotype”. Studies with data on incidence, prevalence (i.e., proportion of cases), or serotypes were included; reviews, case reports, and conference abstracts were excluded. In addition, the references sections of relevant review articles were checked for studies not identified during the online search. The base population used for analyses varied by study. For example, among studies of incidence or proportion of complicated pneumonias or empyema, the base populations included: hospitalized patients [13] or hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) [19, 30–32]; pneumococcal pneumonia [9, 16, 32–40]; IPD [10, 12, 17, 18, 41–49]; complicated pneumonia [7, 13, 50–54]; complicated pneumonia with positive cultures [14]; CPP [55]; empyema [56-61]; or empyema with fistula [62]. Some studies described the clinical methodologies used to identify pleural effusion or empyema prior to microbiological identification. Retrospective studies used: diagnostic coding [16, 19, 30, 31, 35, 52, 61]; records of chest radiographs [9, 33, 48, 50]; computed tomography (CT) [7, 9, 34, 50]; ultrasound [7, 34, 50, 56]; microbiologic culture records [13]; or results at surgery [56]. One study reviewed “pleural effusion data”, although no other details were specified [48]. Prospective studies used: thoracocentesis [39, 51, 53, 54]; CT, ultrasound, or chest radiograph plus clinical signs [58]; CT, ultrasound, or chest radiograph [32]; or physical examination and chest radiograph [37, 60, 63]. One study did not specify the diagnostic methodology [49]. Studies varied in the methodologies used to isolate S. pneumoniae, including: culture of samples from the pleural cavity [7, 13, 49–51, 54, 58, 62, 64–66], blood [32, 68–71], blood and pleural cavity [9, 10, 14, 15, 17, 18, 30, 31, 34–36, 38, 41–48, 52, 53, 56, 57, 63, 72–90], or unspecified sites [33, 40, 91]; and, more recently, investigators used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or real-time PCR to identify pneumococcal-specific genes (e.g., ply, LytA, rpoB, or wzg [cpsA]) in samples from the pleural cavity [43, 46, 49, 51, 53–55, 58, 60, 64, 67, 87, 88, 90, 92–94], blood [15, 32, 37, 75, 95], blood and pleural cavity [88], or nasopharyngeal aspirate [96]. A few studies applied immunochromatographic pneumococcal antigen detection (Binax NOW®) from blood or urine [15, 38, 51, 74, 77, 84]. Pneumococcal serotypes in blood or pleural fluid were identified with the Quellung reaction (also referred to as capsular swelling) [7, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 30, 31, 34–38, 40, 42–49, 56, 68, 69, 71, 73, 77, 82, 85–88, 90–93], dot blot [47, 71, 93], slide or latex agglutination [8–10, 40, 63, 65, 70, 72, 77, 80, 81, 83, 84, 97, 98], enzyme-linked immunoassays [55, 99], real-time PCR [32, 37, 43, 44, 46, 49, 51, 64, 65, 87, 88, 90, 93, 95], or multiplex PCR [54, 58, 60, 67, 74, 84, 92, 94, 97]. The Quellung reaction may include up to all the known serotypes, whereas PCR is typically more limited in the serotypes that can be identified. Some studies used more than one methodology (e.g., initial serotyping of cultured isolates, followed by PCR in culture-negative samples) [37, 65, 87, 88, 93, 94]. Definitions of penicillin susceptibility varied; some studies used breakpoints established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2009 [53, 74, 83, 88, 90, 100], whereas others used pre-2009 breakpoints [7, 9, 15, 17, 30, 34, 63, 73].

Results

A total of 152 papers were initially identified; 68 were excluded because there were no data on incidence or serotypes, or they were case reports; consequently, 84 were included in this analysis. Table 2 presents data on the incidence and proportion of CPP [7, 9, 10, 12–14, 16–19, 30–47, 49–62]. Trends and age-related differences in the studies are discussed below.
Table 2

Proportions of cases and incidence rates of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia (CPP)

Years [ref]Country/ages, statusMethodologyComplicated pneumonia-specific outcome (i.e., cases with CPP)Clinical presentation in patient population (i.e., cases in the patient population)Proportion of casesIR (cases of complicated pneumonia-specific outcome/100,000 population-years)
Time periods or subgroups%(n a/N b)Time periods or subgroupsIR
A. Children
North America
Last year of surveillance: 1999
1993–1999 [30]USA/<19 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single, tertiary care hospital database, UtahEmpyemaCAP1993–199928.3 %(153/540)19941
199413 %(n/a)19995c
199741 %(n/a)
Last year of surveillance: 2000
1993–2000 [34]USA/0–26 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, participants in 8 children’s hospitalsCPPPneumococcal pneumonia0–26 years36.1 %(133/368)n/a
0–12 months26.4 %(19/72)
13–24 months28.6 %(22/77)
25–36 months28.1 %(16/57)
37–48 months29.0 %(11/38)
49–60 months50.0 %(9/18)
≥61 months53.0 %(56/106)
Last year of surveillance: 2001
1996–2001 [7]USA/4 months to 16.5 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database, Tennessee S. pneumoniae-positive complicated parapneumonic effusionsComplicated parapneumonic effusions1996–200140.8 %(31/76)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2003
1996–2003 [10]USA/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, regional medical database, Utah S. pneumoniae-positive parapneumonic empyemaIPD1996–200322 %(52/234)1996–200010.3
1997–200016 %(21/129)n/an/a
2001–200330 %c (31/105)2001–200314.3c
2000–2003 [56]Canada/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, university hospital databases (8 hospitals across Canada) S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaEmpyema2000–200315.1 %(38/251)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2006
1997–2006 [35]USA/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single, tertiary care hospital database, Utah S. pneumoniae-positive necrotizing pneumoniaPneumococcal pneumonia1997–200626.6 %(33/124)n/a
1997–200012.8 %(5/39)
2001–200632.9 %(28/85)
Last year of surveillance: 2007
1996–1999 and 2001–2007 [16]USA/<2 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, national inpatient database S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaPneumococcal pneumonia1996–1999 and 2001–20077.92 %1996–19981.1
2005–20071.3
2–4 years, hospitalized1996–1999 and 2001–200716.87 %1996–19981.1
2005–20072.5
2001–2007 [31]USA/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single, tertiary care hospital database (incidence based on overall pediatric hospitalization rate in Intermountain Healthcare hospitals in Utah)EmpyemaPneumonia200120022003200420052006200724.8 %24.0 %27.7 %28.0 %34.8 %31.1 %35.5 %(62/250)(64/267)(75/271)(74/264)(88/253)(75/241)(104/293)20012002200320042005200620078.58.69.99.611.19.312.5
1997–2007 [50]Canada/≤17 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database, Alberta S. pneumoniae-positive complicated pneumoniaComplicated pneumonia1997–20022002–200720.6 %26.5 %(7/34)(18/68)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2010
1997–2010 [18]USA/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, regional medical database, UtahCPPIPD1997–20002001–201017.2 %33.0 %(22/128)(127/385)n/a
Central/South America
2005–2010 [45]Mexico/1 month to 16 years, hospitalizedProspective, single hospital (Tijuana) active surveillance S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaIPD2005–201046.4 %(13/28)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2008
2003–2008 [36]Brazil/<15 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database S. pneumoniae-positive pleural fluidPneumococcal pneumonia29.9 %(32/107)n/a
Europe
Last year of surveillance: 2003
1997–2003 [55]UK/<17 years, hospitalizedRetrospective and prospective, single tertiary care center S. pneumoniae-positive cavitatory diseaseEmpyema or parapneumonic effusion16.0 %(12/75)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2006
1990–2006 [57]UK/<15 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database, Scotland S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaEmpyema14.3 %(4/28)n/a
1997–2006 [12]Spain/<2 years, hospitalizedProspective, regional children’s hospital S. pneumoniae-positive pneumonia with empyemaIPD1997–20012002–20066.9 %17.9 %(2/29)(12/67)1997–20012002–20062.29.2
2–4 years, hospitalized1997–20012002–200613.3 %34.8 %(2/15)(16/46)1997–20012002–20061.59.2c
5–17 years, hospitalized1997–20012002–20061.4 %33.3 %(3/14)(9/27)1997–20012002–20060.51.3
Last year of surveillance: 2008
2006–2008 [42]Portugal/<18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, laboratory-based surveillance system; S. pneumoniae isolates from IPDIsolates from pleural fluidIPD3.1 %(11/353)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2009
2007–2009 [32]Italy/0–16 years, hospitalizedProspective, observational, nationwideComplicated pneumococcal pneumonia (RT-PCR-positive for S. pneumoniae)CAPCPPParapneumonic effusionParapneumonic effusion with empyemaNecrotizing pneumoniaAtelectasia4.8 %4.6 %2.5 %0.4 %0.1 %(36/753)(35/753)(19/753)(3/753)(1/753)n/a
Complicated pneumococcal pneumonia (RT-PCR-positive for S. pneumoniae) S. pneumoniae-positive CAPCPPParapneumonic effusionParapneumonic effusion with empyemaNecrotizing pneumoniaAtelectasia45.0 %43.7 %23.7 %3.7 %1.2 %(36/80)(35/80)(19/80)(3/80)(1/80)n/a
2006–2009 [51]Spain/children, hospitalizedProspective, single tertiary care center, children with parapneumonic effusion requiring thoracocentesis S. pneumoniae-positive parapneumonic effusionParapneumonic effusion50.9 %(28/55)n/a
2007–2009 [43]Spain/<15 years, hospitalizedProspective, hospital-based surveillance, regional (Madrid) S. pneumoniae-positive parapneumonic empyemaIPD30.3 %(100/330)n/a
2007–2009 [44]Spain/3–59 months, hospitalizedProspective, 2 hospitals S. pneumoniae-positive pneumonia with empyemaIPD65.4 %(189/293)n/a
2000–2009 [52]France/0–18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, regional medical database, Limousin S. pneumoniae-positive pleural effusion, empyema, or pulmonary infectionPleural effusion, empyema, or pulmonary infection2000–20062006–200933.3 %46.2 %(3/9)(12/26)n/a
2002–2009 [62]UK/<17 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database S. pneumoniae-positive fistulasEmpyema with fistula14.2 %(44/310)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2011
2010–2011 [60]Turkey/0–18 years, hospitalizedProspective, nationwide, active surveillance S. pneumoniae-positive pneumonia with empyemaPneumonia with empyema34.0 %(53/156)n/a
2008–2011 [37]Italy/≤5 years, hospitalizedProspective, 5 regional hospitalsCPP, pleural effusion, empyema, necrotizing pneumonia, or atelectasiaPneumococcal CAPCPPPleural effusionEmpyemaNecrotizing pneumoniaAtelectasia26.0 %21.9 %5.5 %0 %5.5 %(19/73)(16/73)(4/73)(0/73)(4/73)n/a
2007–2011 [46]Spain/<15 years, hospitalizedProspective, regional (Madrid) active clinical surveillanceParapneumonic pneumococcal empyemaIPD2007–201134.0 %(209/614)
2007–200830.7 %(50/163)2007–20085.26
2008–200929.9 %(50/167)2008–20095.13
2009–201039.6 %(67/169)2009–20106.73d
2010–201136.5 %(42/115)2010–20114.14
Parapneumonic pneumococcal empyema (PCV13 serotypes)IPD (PCV13 serotypes)2007–200831.2 %(39/125)2007–20084.10
2008–200933.6 %(45/134)2008–20094.62
2009–201040.7 %(55/135)2009–20105.52d
2010–201140.4 %(36/89)2010–20113.55
Last year of surveillance: 2012
2007–2010, 2011–2012 [49]Spain/<12 months, hospitalizedProspective, regional (Madrid) active clinical surveillance S. pneumoniae-positive parapneumonic pneumococcal empyema (any serotype)IPD2007–20102011–20123.7 %5.0 %(4/107)(1/20)2007–20102011–20121.781.36
≥12–24 months, hospitalized2011–20122007–201033.7 %18.2 %(30/89)(2/11)2007–20102011–201213.572.66e
≥24 to <60 months, hospitalized2007–20102011–201247.6 %67.9 %(90/189)(19/28)2007–20102011–201213.818.55
≥60 months to 15 years, hospitalized2007–20102011–201237.7 %50.0 %(43/114)(10/20)2007–20102011–20122.361.53
<15 years, hospitalized2007–20102011–201233.5 %40.5 %(167/499)(32/79)2007–20102011–20125.723.12f
Middle East/North Africa
Last year of surveillance: 1997
1986–1997 [33]Israel/0–16 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, regional medical databasePulmonary complications of pneumococcal pneumoniaPneumococcal pneumonia38.7 %(43/111)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2002
1990–2002 [14]Israel/0–18 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, primary/tertiary hospital database S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaEmpyema with positive cultures45.8 %(11/24)n/a
Asia-Pacific
Last year of surveillance: 2003
1995–2003 [9]Taiwan/<15 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital databaseCPPPneumococcal pneumonia1995199619971998199920002001200225.0 %25.0 %42.9 %57.1 %50.0 %71.4 %61.5 %70.0 %g (1/4)(1/4)(3/7)(4/7)(6/12)(10/14)(8/13)(7/10)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2004
1995–2004 [13]China/<16 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, representative sample from tertiary care hospital S. pneumoniae-positive empyema or pleural effusionEmpyema or pleural effusion1.1 %(5/461)n/a
1995–2004 [13]Korea/<16 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, representative sample from tertiary care hospital S. pneumoniae-positive empyema or pleural effusionEmpyema or pleural effusion6.7 %(9/134)n/a
1997–2004 [41]Singapore/3 months to 19.5 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single hospital database S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaIPD14.3 %(21/147)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2005
1996–2005 [13]Vietnam/<16 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, representative sample from tertiary care hospital S. pneumoniae-positive empyema or pleural effusionEmpyema or pleural effusion0.5 %(3/665)n/a
2000–2005 [13]Taiwan/<16 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, representative sample from tertiary care hospital S. pneumoniae-positive empyema or pleural effusionEmpyema or pleural effusion55.5 %(66/119)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2009
2008–2009 [53]Taiwan/<18 years, hospitalizedProspective, observational, limited enrollment (~100) S. pneumoniae-positive empyema or parapneumonic pleural effusionEmpyema or parapneumonic pleural effusion S. pneumoniae-positive empyema S. pneumoniae-positive parapneumonic pleural effusion27.3 %0 %(12/44)(0/45)n/a
2007–2009 [58]Australia/<16 years, hospitalizedProspective, nationwide empyema surveillance network S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaEmpyemaBlood culturePleural fluid culturePleural fluid PCR12.5 %7.5 %51.0 %(19/152)(12/160)(74/145)n/a
2007–2009 [59]Australia/<16 years, hospitalizedProspective, nationwide empyema surveillance network S. pneumoniae-positive empyema via PCR (lytA testing) of pleural fluidEmpyema54.4 %(43/79)n/a
Last year of surveillance: 2010
1998–2010 [19]Australia/0–19 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, national databaseEmpyemaPneumonian/a1998–20042005–20100.91.2h
<1 yearn/a1998–20042.3
2005–20103.5
1–4 yearsn/a1998–20041.6
2005–20102.7h
5–9 yearsn/a1998–20040.5
2005–20100.5
10–14 yearsn/a1998–20040.4
2005–20100.5
15–19 yearsn/a1998–20040.9
2005–20100.8
2003–2010 [54]Korea/children aged 29–124.5 months, hospitalizedProspective, 2 hospitals (Seoul) S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaParapneumonic effusion21.0 %(13/62)n/a
B. Adults
North America
Last year of surveillance: 2010
2000–2010 [40]Texas, USA/adults, hospitalizedRetrospective, hospital, all cases with chest X-ray available S. pneumoniae-positive necrotizing pneumoniaPneumococcal pneumoniaOverall6.6 %(23/351)n/a
PPV23 vaccinated6.6 %(10/151)
Not vaccinated6.5 %(13/200)
Europe
Last year of surveillance: 2002
1999–2002 [38]Barcelona, Spain/>16 years, hospitalizedProspective, single tertiary care hospital, all cases during study period S. pneumoniae-positive pleural effusion or empyemaPneumococcal CAPPleural effusion15.2 %(19/125)n/a
Empyema6.4 %(8/125)
Last year of surveillance: 2009
1996–2009 [17]Spain/>18 years, hospitalizedProspective, 2 university hospitals (Barcelona), ongoing observational study S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaIPD1996–20012005–200912.2 %11.5 %(62/508)(66/572)1996–20012006–20091.61.8
18–50 years1996–20012005–20097.6 %14.9 %n/an/a1996–20012005–20090.51.6i
50–65 years1996–20012005–200917.3 %11.5 %n/an/a1996–20012005–20091.41.2
>65 years1996–20012005–200912.7 %8.8 %n/an/a1996–20012005–20094.83.5
2001–2009 [39]Spain/adults, hospitalizedProspective, single tertiary care hospital (Barcelona), all cases during study period S. pneumoniae-positive pleural effusion or empyemaPneumococcal pneumoniaPleural effusion19.5 %(122/626)n/a
Empyema2.9 %(18/626)
Last year of surveillance: 2010
1996–2010 [47]Spain/18–64 years, hospitalizedRetrospective, single university hospital (Barcelona) S. pneumoniae-positive empyemaIPDHealthy adultsAdults with comorbidities15.0 %6.9 %(33/220)(36/525)n/a
C. All ages
North America
Last year of surveillance: 2008
1996–2008 [61]USA/all ages, hospitalizedRetrospective, national inpatient database S. pneumonia-positive empyemaEmpyeman/an/a19960.68
20080.74

CAP, community-acquired pneumonia; CPP, complicated pneumococcal pneumonia; IPD, invasive pneumococcal disease; IR, incidence rate; n/a, not applicable; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPV23, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR

a n indicates the number of cases with CPP

b N indicates the number of cases in the patient population

c p < 0.01 for increase

d p < 0.05 vs. 2010–2011

e p < 0.05 for decrease

f p < 0.01 for decrease

g p < 0.05 for increase

hLower 95 % confidence interval of incidence rate ratio >1

i p ≤ 0.001 for increase

Proportions of cases and incidence rates of complicated pneumococcal pneumonia (CPP) CAP, community-acquired pneumonia; CPP, complicated pneumococcal pneumonia; IPD, invasive pneumococcal disease; IR, incidence rate; n/a, not applicable; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PPV23, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR a n indicates the number of cases with CPP b N indicates the number of cases in the patient population c p < 0.01 for increase d p < 0.05 vs. 2010–2011 e p < 0.05 for decrease f p < 0.01 for decrease g p < 0.05 for increase hLower 95 % confidence interval of incidence rate ratio >1 i p ≤ 0.001 for increase

Incidence

The incidence of any-cause empyema among children aged <19 years in Utah (USA) (1994–2007) [30, 31] and Australia (1998–2010) [19] ranged from 0.9 to 12.5 per 100,000 population, and tended to increase over time; the incidence was highest in children aged 0–4 years (Table 2) [19]. Likewise, in Spain from 1997–2001 to 2002–2006, the PnEmp incidence was lower in children aged 5–17 years (0.5–1.3 per 100,000 population) as compared to younger children [12]. In 1996–2001 and 2006–2009, the adult PnEmp incidence was higher in those aged >65 years (3.5–4.8 per 100,000) than other adult age groups (0.5–1.8 per 100,000) (Table 2) [17]. The incidence for PnEmp tended to increase from the late 1990s to the mid-2000s in children in the USA [10, 16] and Spain [12], but remained lower in children aged 5–17 years compared with younger children (Table 2) [12]. For example, the PnEmp incidence among children aged <18 years in Utah (USA) increased from 10.3 per 100,000 population in 1996–2000 to 14.3 per 100,000 population in 2001–2003 [10], and increased in children aged 2–4 years in the USA from 1.1 to 2.5 per 100,000 population from 1996-1998 to 2005–2007, respectively [16]. In Spain from 1997–2001 to 2002–2006, the PnEmp incidence increased from 2.2 to 9.2 per 100,000 population in children aged <2 years and from 1.5 to 9.2 per 100,000 population in children aged 2–4 years [12]. Of note, two studies from Spain showed significant declines in the PnEmp incidence following the introduction of PCV13 into the pediatric immunization program: in one, from 6.73 to 4.14 per 100,000 from 2009–2010 to 2010–2011 (age <15 years) [46]; in the other, from 5.72 to 3.12 per 100,000 population from 2007–2010 to 2011–2012 (p = 0.0019) (age <15 years) [49], and from 3.57 to 2.66 per 100,000 population (p = 0.0224) (ages ≥12 to <24 months) (Table 2) [49].

Proportion of cases with CPP

Outcomes used as numerators for proportions of cases with CPP ranged from more general (e.g., pulmonary complications, complicated pneumonia) to more specific (e.g., empyema, cavitatory disease). Denominators varied, including hospitalized patients, hospitalized patients with CAP, hospitalized patients with pneumococcal CAP, or children with parapneumonic PnEmp. In addition, the assessment methods varied in sensitivity, which may have affected the reported proportions. For example, in hospitalized children with empyema in Australia, only 7.5 % of pleural fluid cultures, but 51.0 % of pleural fluid PCRs, were pneumococcal-positive [58]. The proportion of cases of CPP or PnEmp among hospitalized children with pneumococcal pneumonia or IPD ranged from 7.9 to 71.4 % (Table 2) and tended to increase over time [9, 10, 12, 16, 18, 32–37, 41, 44–46, 49]. For example, the proportions of cases of CPP or PnEmp in hospitalized children with IPD in Spain increased from 6.9 % in 1997–2001 [12] to 65.4 % during 2007–2009 [10, 18, 41, 44–46, 49]. Among hospitalized children with CAP in Utah (USA), the proportion of cases of complicated pneumonia and empyema increased from 13 % in 1994 to 41 % in 1997 [30]. Among children with complicated pneumonia or empyema, the proportion of cases of PnEmp as reported in several countries ranged from 0 to 54.4 %, although the sample sizes were often small [7, 13, 14, 49, 50, 52–60, 62]. Among hospitalized adults with pneumococcal CAP, the proportions of cases with pleural effusion (PE) (15.2–19.5 %, Spain) [38, 39] were higher than those for PnEmp (6.4 %, Spain) [38] or necrotizing pneumonia (6.5–6.6 %, USA) [40]. Among hospitalized adults with IPD in Spain, 6.9–15.0 % were diagnosed with PnEmp (Table 2) [17, 47].

Effect of age on the incidence and proportion of cases of CPP

The effect of age on CPP was not consistent across studies, and age effects for incidence differed as compared to proportion. In most studies, older children comprised a larger proportion of those with CPP or PnEmp relative to other pneumococcal diseases. In Utah (USA) (1997–2010), children with CPP were significantly older than those with other forms of IPD (37 months vs. 25 months; p < 0.001) [18]. Among children with pneumococcal pneumonia in the USA (1993–2000), the proportion of cases with CPP increased with age from 26.4 % (ages 0–12 months) to 53.0 % (ages >61 months) [34]. In contrast, in a study of children from four Asian countries (Vietnam, China, Korea, and Taiwan), empyema and PE were most common in the younger age groups, particularly those ≤4 years of age [13]. The pattern of age-specific incidence may differ from that of the proportion of cases. For example, among hospitalized children with IPD in Spain (1997–2006), the proportion of cases with PnEmp increased with age from 6.9–17.9 % (ages <2 years) to 21.4–33.3 % (ages 5–17 years), whereas the PnEmp incidence declined with age from 2.2–9.2 per 100,000 population (ages <2 years) to 0.5–1.3 per 100,000 population (ages 5–17 years), which seems to parallel the pattern of IPD incidence among children [12]. In particular, in another study in Spain (2007–2012), the PnEmp incidence was greater among children aged ≥24 to <60 months (8.55–13.81 per 100,000 population) than among younger (<12 months: 1.78– 1.36 per 100,000 population) or older (5–15 years: 1.53–2.36 per 100,000 population) children [49]. In Spain (1996–2009), although adults aged 50–65 years had a higher proportion of cases of PnEmp (17.3 %) than adults aged >65 years (12.7 %), the PnEmp incidence was lower among adults aged 50–65 years than those aged >65 years (1.4 vs. 4.8 per 100,000 population, respectively) [17], which is consistent with the trend of age-specific incidence of IPD with aging.

Serotype epidemiology

Table 3 presents data on serotype epidemiology [7–9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 30–35, 37, 39–41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51–60, 62, 64, 66–69, 72, 73, 75–84, 86–91, 93, 94, 97, 99, 101, 102]. Globally, serotypes 1 and 19A exhibited strong associations with pneumococcal PE [15, 52, 66, 69], PnEmp [10, 31, 43, 46, 49, 54, 57, 58, 60, 68, 72, 81, 83, 88, 90, 93, 101], or both [32, 39, 44].
Table 3

Distribution of community-acquired complicated pneumonias by serogroup/serotype

Years, country/[ref]Serotype assessment methodology/source/diagnosisIsolatesSerogroups or serotypes
Age range/subgroupNumber serotypedPCV7 serotypes/serogroups (%a)6 additionalb serotypes/serogroups in PCV13 (%a)11 additionalc serotypes/serogroups in PPV23 (%a)Non-vaccine serotypes/serogroups, or other (%a)
Serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23FSerotypes 1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, and 19ASerotypes 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20, 22F, and 33F
A. Children
North America
Last year of surveillance: 1999
1993–1999, USA/[30]Capsular swelling/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<19 years269 (15.4 %)1 (50.0 %)12 (3.8 %)29 (3.8 %)
14 (15.4 %)Non-typeable (3.8 %)
18 (3.8 %)
19 (3.8 %)
Subtotald 38.5 %50.0 %3.8 %7.7 %
Last year of surveillance: 2000
1993–2000, USA/[34]Quellung/bl and/or pl/CPPChildren13314 (29.1 %)1 (24.4 %)0Other (5.5 %)
19 (9.0 %)3 (8.4 %)
6 (8.4 %)5 (3.4 %)
9 (5.0 %)
4 (3.4 %)
23 (3.4 %)
Subtotald 58.3 %36.2 %05.5 %
Last year of surveillance: 2001
1996–2001, Tennessee, USA/[7]Quellung/bl, pl/CPP4 months to 16.5 years2014 (35.0 %)1 (25.0 %)12 (5.0 %)
23F (10.0 %)19A (15.0 %)22 (5.0 %)
9V (5.0 %)
Subtotald 50.0 %40.0 %10.0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2003
2000–2003, Canada/[56]Quellung/bl, pl, lt/pneumococcal empyema<18 years3514 (28.6 %)3 (25.7 %)
6B (8.6 %)1 (22.9 %)
9V (5.7 %)6A (2.9 %)
4 (2.9 %)
23F (2.9 %)
Subtotald 48.6 %51.4 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2005
1996–2005, USA/[73]Capsular swelling/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<18 years/1996–20002414 (12.5 %)1 (45.8 %)Not tested (8.3 %)
6B (8.3 %)6A (4.2 %)
19F (8.3 %)19A (4.2 %)
9V (4.2 %)
23F (4.2 %)
Subtotald 37.5 %54.2 %0 %8.3 %
2001–20055019F (6.0 %)1 (34.0 %)9N (2.0 %)28 (2.0 %)
9V (4.0 %)3 (20.0 %)22 (2.0 %)Not tested (8.0 %)
4 (2.0 %)19A (14.0 %)
18C (2.0 %)7 (4.0 %)
Subtotald 14.0 %72.0 %4.0 %10.0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2006
1997–2006, USA/[35]Capsular swelling/bl, pl/pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia<18 years/1997–2006386B (5.2 %)3 (28.9 %)8 (2.6 %)19 (10.5 %)
4 (2.6 %)19A (10.5 %)17 (2.6 %)NT (5.3 %)
19F (2.6 %)1 (7.9 %)NG (2.6 %)
6A (2.6 %)6 (2.6 %)
7 (2.6 %)18 (2.6 %)
28 (2.6 %)
29/38/42 (2.6 %)
Subtotald 10.4 %52.5 %5.2 %28.8 %
1997–200056B (40.0 %)1 (20.0)00
19F (20.0 %)6A (20.0)
Subtotald 60.0 %40.0 %0 %0 %
2001–2006274 (3.7 %)7 (40.7 %)8 (3.7 %)19 (14.8 %)
19A (14.8 %)17 (3.7 %)NG (3.7 %)
3 (7.4 %)NT (7.4 %)
Subtotald 3.7 %63.0 %7.4 %25.9 %
Last year of surveillance: 2007
1993–2007, Utah, USA/[31]Capsular swelling/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<18 years/1993–19992614 (15.4 %)1 (50.0 %)Others (11.5 %)
9V (15.4 %)
19F (3.8 %)
18C (3.8 %)
Subtotald 38.4 %50.0 %0 %11.5 %
2001–2007519V (2.0 %)1 (33.3 %)17 (2.0 %)38 (2.0 %)
3 (27.5 %)22F (2.0 %)Non-typeable (2.0 %)
19A (25.5 %)
7F (3.9 %)
Subtotald 2.0 %90.2 %4.0 %4.0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2009
2007–2009, USA/[67]Multiplex immunoassay/pl/CPP0.4–15 years496B (2.0 %)3 (26.5 %)8 (2.0 %)Non-typeable (18.4 %)
19A (22.4 %)33F/33A (2.0 %)
7F/7A (14.3 %)
1 (12.2 %)
Subtotald 2.0 %75.5 %4.0 %18.4 %
2009, Utah, USA/[64]Real-time PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyema<18 years457F (46.7 %)Untyped (22.2 %)
19A (13.3 %)
3 (13.3 %)
1 (4.4 %)
Subtotald 0 %77.8 %0 %22.2 %
Last year of surveillance: 2010
1997–2010, Utah, USA/[18]Capsular swelling/bl, pl/CPP<18 years/1997–200022PCV7 (40.9 %)Other (59.1 %)
Subtotald 40.9 %0 %0 %59.1 %
2001–2010127PCV7 (5.5 %)1 (19.7 %)22F (3.9 %)Other (19.7 %)
7F (18.9 %)
19A (17.3 %)
3 (16.5 %)
Subtotald 5.5 %72.4 %3.9 %19.7 %
South America
Last year of surveillance: 2004
1998–2004, Uruguay/[76]Latex agglutination/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyemaChildren23714 (24.1 %)1 (23.6 %)8 (0.8 %)18B (0.4 %)
9V (3.8 %)5 (23.2 %)9N (0.8 %)7 (0.4 %)
6B (2.1 %)3 (10.1 %)12 (0.4 %)
19F (0.8 %)7F (3.4 %)10A (0.4 %)
4 (0.4 %)19A (3.0 %)15 (0.4 %)
6A (0.8 %)22 (0.4 %)
33 (0.4 %)
Subtotald 31.2 %64.1 %3.8 %0.8 %
2002–2004, Uruguay/[66]Quellung/pl/CPP0–14 years191n/a1 (26.2 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/a26.2 %n/an/a
Europe
Last year of surveillance: 2001
1997–2001, England/[8]Latex agglutination; ELISA (PCV13 serotypes)/pl/pneumococcal empyema0.6–16.9 years4314 (11.6 %)1 (39.5 %)Negative (23.2 %)
3 (7.0 %) Insufficient (18.6 %)f
Subtotald 11.6 %46.5 %0 %41.9 %
Last year of surveillance: 2003
1997–2003, England/[55]EIA (PCV13 serotypes)/bl, pl/pneumococcal cavitatory empyema0.5–16.9 years1114 (18.2 %)1 (36.4 %)
9V (18.2 %)3 (27.3 %)
Subtotald 36.4 %63.7 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2004
2002–2004, France/[72]Latex agglutination/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<15 years3014 (13.3 %)19A (26.7 %)
23F (6.7 %)1 (23.3 %)
6B (3.3 %)3 (10.0 %)
9V (3.3 %)5 (6.7 %)
18C (3.3 %)7F (3.3 %)
Subtotald 30.0 %70.0 %0 %0 %
2003–2004, England/[99]ELISA (PCV13 serotypes)/pl/pneumococcal empyema0.8–14.8 years274 (14.8 %)g 1 (66.7 %)
9V (3.7 %)3 (7.4 %)
23F (3.7 %)g 7F (3.7 %)
Subtotald 22.2 %77.8 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2006
1990–2006, Scotland/[57]Not specified/bl, pl, sp/pneumococcal empyema0–14 years6n/a1 (50.0 %)e n/aNot tested (50.0 %)
Subtotald n/a50.0 %n/an/a
2004–2006, Spain/[101]MLST/pl/pneumococcal empyema<14 years2714 (11.1 %)1 (29.6 %)Other serotypes not confirmed (55.6 %)
19A (3.7 %)
Subtotald 11.1 %33.3 %055.6 %
2003–2006, Spain/[87]Quellung, real-time PCR/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<18 years11114 (8.1 %)1 (47.7 %)8 (0.9 %)
9V (1.8 %)7F (12.6 %)
19F (0.9 %)3 (10.8 %)
5 (8.1 %)
19A (7.2 %)
6A (1.8 %)
Subtotald 10.8 %89.1 %0.9 %0
2003–2006, Spain/[15]Quellung/bl, pl/pneumococcal parapneumonic pleural effusion<18 years2714 (11.1 %)1 (37.0 %)
6B (3.7 %)3 (14.8 %)
9V (3.7 %)5 (14.8 %)
19A (7.4 %)
6A (3.7 %)
7F (3.7 %)
Subtotald 18.5 %81.5 %00
2003–2006, Spain/[93]Real-time PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyemaChildren6714 (4.5 %)1 (34.3 %)8 (1.5 %)Unknown (22.4 %)
19F/B/C (1.5 %)7F/7A (16.4 %)3 (11.9 %)19A (4.5 %)5 (3.0 %)
Subtotald 6.0 %70.1 %1.5 %22.4 %
Last year of surveillance: 2007
2007, France/[97]Latex agglutination/pl, hospitalized patients with pneumococcal disease1 month to 12.6 years101 (50.5 %)
19A (50.5 %)
Subtotald 0 %100 %0 %0 %
1997–2007, Spain/[86]Quellung, real-time PCR (19A only, 1997–2001)/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema1 month to 17 years1997–2001: 7n/a19A (0)e n/aOther (100 %)
2002–2004: 1319A (7.7 %)e Other (92.3 %)
2005–2007: 3419A (17.6 %)e Other (82.4 %)
Last year of surveillance: 2008
1989–2008, Spain, Barcelona/[68]Quellung/bl, other sterile sites/pneumococcal empyema<18 years68n/a1 (41.2 %)n/aSerotypes other than 1 (58.8 %)
Subtotald n/a41.2 %n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2009
1992–2009, France/[77]Not specified/bl, pl/pneumococcal pleural effusion6 months to 15 yearsh/2006–2009419A (50.0 %)
1 (25.0 %)
5 (25.0 %)
Subtotald 0 %100 %0 %0 %
2000–2009, France/[52]Not specified/bl, pl/CPP0–18 years/2000–2006319A (33.3 %)Unknown (66.7 %)
Subtotald n/a33.3 %n/an/a
2006–200981 (50.0 %)Unknown (12.5 %)
19A (25.0 %)
3 (12.5 %)
Subtotal d n/a87.5 %n/an/a
2007–2009, Italy/[32]Real-time PCR/bl/CPP0–16 years3614 (5.6 %)1 (50.0 %)20 (2.8 %)Non-typeable (2.8 %)
18 (5.6 %)3 (13.9 %)
6 (2.8 %)19A (11.1 %)
9V (2.8 %)7F (2.8 %)
Subtotald 16.7 %77.8 %2.8 %2.8 %
2005–2009, Spain/[88]Quellung; PCR of culture-negative specimens/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<14 years/2005–200910414 (2.9 %)1 (42.3 %)12A (1.0 %)
9V (1.0 %)7F (20.2 %)
19F (1.0 %)3 (16.3 %)
19A (7.7 %)
5 (6.7 %)
6A (1.0 %)
Subtotald 4.8 %94.2 %0 %1.0 %
2005–20075314 (3.8 %)1 (43.4 %)
19F (1.9 %)7F (26.4 %)
3 (15.1 %)
19A (3.8 %)
5 (3.8 %)
6A (1.9 %)
Subtotald 5.7 %94.3 %0 %0 %
2007–20095114 (2.0 %)1 (41.2 %)12A (2.0 %)
9V (2.0 %)3 (17.6 %)
7F (13.7 %)
19A (11.8 %)
5 (9.8 %)
Subtotald 3.9 %94.1 %0 %2.0 %
2006–2009, Spain/[51]Real-time PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyemaChildren (mean age 6.5 years)286B (7.1 %)1 (35.7 %)n/aUnknown serotype (14.3 %)
9V (7.1 %)7F (10.7 %)
14 (3.8 %)19A (10.7 %)
23F (3.8 %)3 (7.1 %)
Subtotald 21.4 %64.3 %n/an/a
2007–2009, Spain/[44]Quellung; real-time PCR if culture-negative/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema3–59 months189Specific PVC7 serotypes were not specified (2.6 %)1 (24.9 %)n/aOther serotypes not specified (39.7 %)
3 (14.8 %)
19A (14.3 %)
7F (3.7 %)
Subtotald 2.6 %57.7 %n/an/a
2007–2009, Spain/[43, 90]Quellung, PCR/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema<15 years1001 (38.0 %)Other serotypes not specified (19.0 %)
5 (15.0 %)
19A (11.0 %)
7F (9.0 %)
3 (8.0 %)
Subtotald n/a81.0 %n/an/a
1998–2009, Spain/[78]Latex agglutination bl, CSF, pl, synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid/pneumococcal empyema<16 years22n/a19A (13.6 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/an/an/an/a
2008–2009, UK/[62]Not specified/pl/pneumococcal empyema with or without fistula<17 years/bronchopleural fistula133 (76.9 %)19 (7.7 %)Unidentified (7.7 %)Not tested (7.7 %)
Subtotald n/a84.6 %n/an/a
Empyema without fistula151 (46.7 %)Unidentified (6.7 %)
3 (6.7 %)Not tested (33.3 %)
7A/F (6.7 %)
Subtotald n/a60.0 %n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2010
2009–2010, France/[84]Latex agglutination; multiplex PCR/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema0.8–14.7 years1119A (54.5 %)
1 (18.2 %)
7F/A (18.2 %)
3 (9.1 %)
Subtotald 0 %100 %0 %0 %
2006–2010, Spain/[89]Latex agglutination/bl, pl, brpneumococcal empyemaChildren (age range not otherwise specified)1n/a7F (100 %)n/an/a
Subtotald 0 %100 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2011
2006–2011, UK/[94]Multiplex polysaccharide antigen detection assay/pl (culture-negative)/pneumococcal empyema0–16 years136n/a1 (43 %)3 (21 %)7 (11 %)19A (10 %)n/an/a
Subtotald n/a85 %n/an/a
2009–2011, UK/[75]RT-PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyema≤16 years18n/a1 (38.9 %)Non-typeable: 5.6 %
3 (27.8 %)
19A (22.2 %)
7A/F (5.6 %)
Subtotald 0 %94.4 %0 %5.6 %
2008–2011, Italy/[37]Real-time PCR (PCV13 serotypes)/bl/CPP≤5 years184 (5.6 %)19A (33.3 %)Untypeable or other serotype (33.3 %)
14 (5.6 %)3 (11.1 %)
7F (5.6 %)
1 (5.6 %)
Subtotal d 11.2 %55.6 %0 %33.3 %
2007–2011, Spain/[46]Quellung; real-time PCR/bl, pl/bacteremic pneumococcal empyema<15 years209n/a1 (41.6 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/a41.6 %e n/an/a
2010–2011, Turkey/[60]Multiple antigen testing (PCV13 serotypes/serogroups and serotype 8)/pneumococcal empyema0–18 years5519F (5.5 %)1 (14.5 %)8 (5.5 %)18 (1.8 %)
6B (3.6 %)5 (12.7 %)Non-classified (36.4 %)
14 (3.6 %)3 (9.1 %)
9V (1.8 %)7F (1.8 %)
23F (1.8 %)19A (1.8 %)
Subtotald 16.4 %40.0 %5.5 %38.2 %
Last year of surveillance: 2012
2007–2012, Spain/[49]Quellung, real-time PCR<15 years/2007-2010167Individual PCV7 serotypes not specified (4.2 %)1 (39.5 %)n/aOther serotypes not specified (16.8 %)
19A (15.6 %)
5 (9.6 %)
3 (9.0 %)
7F (5.4 %)
Subtotald 4.2 %83.2 %n/an/a
2011–201232n/a1 (37.5 %)n/aOther serotypes not specified (34.4 %)
3 (15.6 %)
7F (12.5 %)
Subtotald n/a65.6 %n/an/a
Middle East/North Africa
Last year of surveillance: 1997
1986–1997, Israel/[33]Not specified/not specified/CPP0–16 years22n/a1 (31.8 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/a31.8 %e n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2002
1990–2002, Israel/[14]Quellung/bl, pl/CPP0–18 years114 (25.0 %)1 (62.5 %)
5 (12.5 %)
Subtotald 25.0 %75.0 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2009
2000–2009, Israel/[69]Quellung/bl/pneumococcal bacteremic pneumonia with pleural effusion<18 years2814 (14.3 %)1 (53.6 %)NoneNone
19F (3.6 %)5 (17.9 %)
19A (7.1 %)
6A (3.6 %)
Subtotald 17.9 %82.1 %0 %0 %
2000–2009, Israel/[79]Not specified/pl, bl/pneumococcal empyema2 months to 18 years89V (25.0 %)5 (37.5 %)NoneNone
4 (12.5 %)3 (12.5 %)
14 (12.5 %)
Subtotald 50.0 %50.0 %0 %0 %
Asia-Pacific
Last year of surveillance: 2003
1995–2003, Taiwan/[9]Slide agglutination/bl, pl/CPP9–144 months1914 (68.4 %)
6 (21.1 %)
23 (10.5 %)
Subtotald 100 %0 %0 %0 %
1998–2003, Taiwan/[80]Slide agglutination/bl, pl/CPP9–85 months1014 (50.0 %)3 (30.0 %)
18C (10.0 %)6A (10.0 %)
Subtotald 60.0 %40.0 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2004
1997–2004, Singapore/[41]Quellung/bl, pl/invasive pneumococcal pneumonia or empyema3 months to 19.5 years62i 14 (33.9 %)6A (8.1 %)
6B (17.7 %)19A (4.8 %)
6j (3.2 %)1 (1.6 %)
23F (17.7 %)
19F (4.8 %)
19j (3.2 %)
18j (4.8 %)
Subtotald 74.2 %14.5 %n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2009
2007–2009, Australia/[58]Multiplex PCR/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema0.4–15.5 months55j 14 (1.8 %)19A (36.4 %)22F/22A (3.6 %)6C (1.8 %)
9V/A (1.8 %)3 (32.7 %)15F (1.8 %)
1 (14.5 %)21 (1.8 %)
7F/7A (3.6 %)
Subtotald 3.6 %87.3 %3.6 %5.5 %
2007–2009, Australia/[59]Multiplex PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyema≤16 years299V/9A (3.4 %)19A (41.4 %)22F/22A (6.9 %)None
3 (31.0 %)
1 (13.8 %)
7F/7A (3.4 %)
Subtotald 3.4 %89.7 %6.9 %0 %
2006–2009, Taiwan/[102]MLST/bl, pl/pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia<18 years1214 (75.0 %)19A (16.7 %)NoneNone
3 (8.3 %)
Subtotald 75.0 %25.0 %0 %0 %
2008–2009, Taiwan/[53]Quellung, multiplex PCR/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema, or pneumococcal parapneumonic pleural effusion<18 years/empyema3314 (12.1 %)19A (42.4 %)Unknown (24.2 %)
6B (6.1 %)3 (12.0 %)
1 (3.0 %)
Subtotald 18.2 %57.6 %n/an/a
Parapneumonic pleural effusion206B (5.0 %)19A (20.0 %)23A (5.0 %)
14 (5.0 %)3 (5.0 %)Unknown (60.0 %)
Subtotald 10.0 %25.0 %n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2010
2003–2010, Korea/[54]Multiplex PCR/pl/pneumococcal empyema29–124.5 months1314 (7.7 %)19A (46.2 %)34 (7.7 %)
1 (7.7 %)Untypeable (30.8 %)
Subtotald 7.7 %53.8 %0 %38.5 %
1998–2010, Taiwan/[48]Quellung/bl, pl/CPP<18 years3114 (32.3 %)3 (35.5 %)
6B (12.9 %)19A (12.9 %)
9V (6.5 %)
Subtotald 51.6 %48.4 %0 %0 %
Last year of surveillance: 2011
2007–2011, Taiwan/[83]Latex agglutination/bl, pl/pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia, pneumococcal empyema<18 years/necrotizing pneumonia13n/a19A (69.2 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald Empyema31n/an/an/an/a
n/a19A (71.0 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/an/an/an/a
B. Adults
North America
Last year of surveillance: 2010
2000–2010, Texas, USA/[40]Agglutination; Quellung/source not specified/necrotizing pneumococcal pneumoniaAdults169V (12.5 %)3 (31.2 %)12F (6.2 %)15A (6.2 %)
6B (6.2 %)9N (6.2 %)33A (6.2 %)
19F (6.2 %)15B (6.2 %)Other (not specified) (6.2 %)
23F (6.2 %)
Subtotald 31.2 %31.2 %18.8 %18.8 %
2009–2010, Utah, USA/[82]Not specified/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema≥18 years6n/a19A (50.0 %)e n/an/a
7F (33.3 %)e
Subtotald n/a83.3 %n/an/a
Europe
Last year of surveillance: 2007
2007, France/[97]Latex agglutination; multiplex PCR/pl, hospitalized patients with pneumococcal disease≥15 years12n/a19A (33.3 %)e n/an/a
Subtotald n/a33.3 %n/an/a
Last year of surveillance: 2009
1996–2009, Spain/[17]Quellung/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema>18 years/1996–2001619V (6.6 %)3 (24.6 %)8 (6.6 %)Other (11.5 %)
14 (6.6 %)1 (14.8 %)
4 (1.6 %)7F (9.8 %)
19F (1.6 %)6A (8.2 %)
Other PCV7 serotypes (8.2 %)5 (3.3 %)
19A (3.3 %)
Subtotald 24.6 %57.4 %6.6 %11.5 %
2005–20096014 (5.0 %)1 (43.3 %)k 8 (1.7 %)Other (10.0 %)
4 (3.3 %)3 (13.3 %)
19F (3.3 %)7F (6.7 %)
9V (1.7 %)6A (5 %)
Other PCV7 serotypes not listed (1.7 %)5 (3.3 %)
19A (1.7 %)
Subtotald 15.0 %73.3 %1.7 %10.0 %
2006–2009, Spain/[39]Multiplex real-time PCR/bl, pl, sp/CPPAdults5214 (7.7 %)1 (32.7 %)12F (5.8 %)9A (1.9 %)
4 (3.8 %)19A (21.2 %)10A (1.9 %)31 (1.9 %)
9V (3.8 %)3 (9.6 %)
5 (5.8 %)
6A (1.9 %)
7F (1.9 %)
Subtotald 15.4 %73.1 %7.7 %3.8 %
Last year of surveillance: 2010
1996–2010, Spain/[47]Dot blot; Quellung/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema18–64 years6819F (4.4 %)1 (25.0 %)8 (2.9 %)23A (2.9 %)
23F (4.4 %)3 (11.7 %)22 (2.9 %)Other (16.2 %)
4 (2.9 %)7F (5.9 %)
6B (2.9 %)5 (4.4 %)
9V (2.9 %)19A (4.4 %)
18C (2.9 %)6A (2.9 %)
Subtotald n/ae 54.4 %n/ae 19.1 %
2006–2010, Spain/[89]Latex agglutination/bl, pl, brpneumococcal empyemaAdults (age range not otherwise specified)41 (50.0 %)
3 (25.0 %)
19A (25.0 %)
Subtotald 0 %100 %0 %0 %
C. All ages
Asia-Pacific
Last year of surveillance: 2000
1996–2000, India/[81]Co-agglutination/bl, pl/pneumococcal empyema0–65 years1923 (5.3 %)1 (47.4 %)Other (10.5 %)
5 (10.5 %)Untypeable (21.1 %)
3 (5.3 %)
Subtotald 5.3 %63.2 %n/an/a

bl, blood; br, bronchoscopy; CPP, complicated pneumococcal pneumonia; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; lt, lung tissue; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; n/a, not applicable; NG, no growth during serotyping; NT, non-typeable; PAD, pneumococcal antigen detection via immunochromatography; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PCV7, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; pl, pleural fluid; PPV23; 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR; sp, sputum

a% = number of samples with a given serotype, divided by the number of samples serotyped, among patients with a given diagnosis

bSerotypes in addition to those in PCV7

cSerotypes in addition to those in PCV7 and serotypes 1 and 3, which are in PCV13

dSubtotal percentages were calculated based on the number of cases for a given serotype category divided by the number serotyped. Due to rounding, subtotals may not equal the sum of the percentages, and the subtotals in each row may not add up to 100

eOther serotypes not reported

fInsufficient pleural fluid available for testing

gOne specimen had two serotypes (4 and 23F)

hVaccinated with PCV7

iIncludes both pneumonia and empyema

jThree specimens had two serotypes each (19A and 3, 19A and 1, 6C and 15F)

k p < 0.001 for increase

Distribution of community-acquired complicated pneumonias by serogroup/serotype bl, blood; br, bronchoscopy; CPP, complicated pneumococcal pneumonia; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; lt, lung tissue; MLST, multilocus sequence typing; n/a, not applicable; NG, no growth during serotyping; NT, non-typeable; PAD, pneumococcal antigen detection via immunochromatography; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PCV7, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; PCV13, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; pl, pleural fluid; PPV23; 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR; sp, sputum a% = number of samples with a given serotype, divided by the number of samples serotyped, among patients with a given diagnosis bSerotypes in addition to those in PCV7 cSerotypes in addition to those in PCV7 and serotypes 1 and 3, which are in PCV13 dSubtotal percentages were calculated based on the number of cases for a given serotype category divided by the number serotyped. Due to rounding, subtotals may not equal the sum of the percentages, and the subtotals in each row may not add up to 100 eOther serotypes not reported fInsufficient pleural fluid available for testing gOne specimen had two serotypes (4 and 23F) hVaccinated with PCV7 iIncludes both pneumonia and empyema jThree specimens had two serotypes each (19A and 3, 19A and 1, 6C and 15F) k p < 0.001 for increase In Utah (USA) (2001–2010), CPP in children was caused mainly by serotypes 1, 7F, 19A, and 3 (Table 3). Compared with other serotypes, serotype 1 was significantly more likely to cause CPP than other pneumococcal diseases (86 % vs. 29 %; odds ratio [OR], 14.0; p < 0.001) [18]. Among children with IPD in Spain (2002–2006), serotype 1 caused 29.6 % of cases of PnEmp, compared with 11.1 % caused by PCV7 serotypes (NB, which were all serotype 14 isolates) (Table 3) [101]. Similarly, among adults during 2006–2009 in Spain, serotype 1 caused 32.7 % of cases of PE [39]. Serotype 19A also appears to be important, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. For example, serotype 19A caused 69.2 % and 71.0 % of cases of pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia and PnEmp, respectively, in children in Taiwan [83], 46.2 % of PnEmp cases in children in Korea [54], and 36.4 % of PnEmp cases in children in Australia [58]. Serotypes varied in their prevalence as complicated versus uncomplicated pneumonia. In children in Utah (USA) (1997–2006), serotype 3 was the most frequent cause of pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia (28.9 %; 11/38 cases), whereas serotype 1 (22.6 %; 28/124 cases) was predominant in uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia [35]. Conversely, among children with community-acquired invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) (i.e., pneumonia with S. pneumoniae isolated from blood or pleural fluid) in Italy (2007–2009), serotype 1 caused a significantly higher percentage of CPP than uncomplicated pneumonia (50 % vs. 18.2 %; p = 0.005) [32]. In children aged <18 years in Taiwan (1998–2010), the proportions of cases of CPP caused by PCV7 and non-PCV7 serotypes were similar (51.6 % and 48.4 %, respectively), and serotypes 14 and 3 were the most common serotypes (32.3 % and 35.5 % of cases, respectively). Serotype 3 was the most common serotype causing CPP compared with uncomplicated lobar pneumonia (OR, 0.114; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.013–0.973) [48]. In children with any-cause empyema in the UK (2002–2009), S. pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated organism, found in 44 of 70 children (62.9 %) from whom an organism was identified [62]. Serotype 3 was significantly more common in pneumococcal bronchopleural fistula (10/13 cases) compared with no fistula (1/15 cases) (p < 0.0001), whereas serotype 1 was the most common serotype among cases without fistula (7/15 cases) and was not found among those with fistula [62]. In children in England with cavitatory disease complicating PnEmp or pneumococcal parapneumonic effusion, the most common serotypes were 1 (4/11 cases, 36.4 %) and 3 (3/11 cases, 27.3 %) [55]. Among Spanish adults (2006–2009), serotype 1 was the most frequent cause of CPP (32.7 %) and uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia (31.2 %); the other frequent causes of complicated pneumonia, in descending order of frequency, were serotypes 19A, 3, 14, 5, and 12F (Table 3) [39]. In adults in the USA with pneumococcal pneumonia (n = 351), serotype 3, the most common cause of pneumonia overall, was isolated in 5 of 16 specimens (31.2 %) from patients with pneumococcal necrosis; 10 other serotypes caused the remaining 11 cases (Table 3) [40]. Serotype 1 undergoes periodic outbreaks, so it is possible that increases in serotype 1 PnEmp may be associated with a cyclic pattern [87]. Serotype 1 clones were analyzed in PnEmp among children [31, 87, 101] and adults [47]. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of pediatric PnEmp cases in Utah (USA) suggested that replacement sequence types (STs) contributed to the increase in incidence of pediatric PnEmp post-PCV7 [31]. Before 2001, only ST227 (serotype 1) was identified; by 2003, six additional STs were associated with serotype 1, including a single-locus variant of ST227. In contrast, among serotype 1 isolates causing pediatric PnEmp in Spain (2004–2006), three clones were identified (ST228, ST306, and ST304); these were historically well-established clones [101]. A more recent study of pediatric PnEmp in Spain (2003–2006) identified the same three serotype 1 clones in pleural fluid [87]. MLST types associated with the increased incidence of pediatric PnEmp had been present previously in Spain and elsewhere in Europe, and, therefore, the increase in proportions of PnEmp (predominantly serotype 1) was probably not associated with the emergence of new clones or of capsular switching [87, 101]. For adults in Spain (1996–2010), an increase in PnEmp incidence in otherwise healthy adults with pneumonia was associated predominantly with serotype 1, in particular, ST306 [47].

Antibiotic resistance

Antibiotic sensitivity data are available from CPP isolates, which are predominately the serotypes 14, 1, and 19A; among these three predominant PCV13 serotypes, only 19A tends to be associated with antibiotic resistance (probably due to its relationship with nasopharyngeal carriage). Among children in Utah (USA) (1993–1999), PnEmp was less likely than uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia to be caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci (16 % vs. 48 %; p = 0.0021); all serotype 1 isolates were penicillin-susceptible [30]. For pediatric CPP in Tennessee (USA) (1996–2001), all serotype 1 isolates (n = 5) were susceptible to penicillin, whereas 5 of 7 serotype 14 isolates (the most frequently identified isolate in this sample) were penicillin-resistant [7]. (By contrast, in eight children’s hospitals in the USA (1993–2000), the antibiotic resistance rates were similar among isolates from CPP and uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonias [34].) Serotype 19A is associated with reduced sensitivity to antibiotics [15, 53, 83, 90]. In Spain, 11 % of cases of pediatric PnEmp were caused by serotype 19A; all three culture-positive serotype 19A isolates were non-susceptible to cefotaxime, and two were also non-susceptible to parenteral penicillin [90]. Other serotypes isolated in this study (1, 5, and 7F) were susceptible to parenteral beta-lactams and showed low rates of resistance to oral penicillin and erythromycin. In another Spanish study (2003–2006), 8 of 27 pneumococcal isolates from pediatric PnEmp showed reduced susceptibility to penicillin; two serotype 19A isolates and one each of serotypes 14 and 3 showed resistance to multiple antibiotics [15]. Similarly, in Taiwan (2007–2011), serotype 19A isolates from pediatric PnEmp had lower levels of susceptibility to cefotaxime than non-19A isolates, although the 19A and non-19A isolates had similar susceptibility to other antibiotics [83]. In Taiwanese children with empyema (2008–2009), 4 of 8 pneumococcal isolates were penicillin-resistant (i.e., serotypes 19A [n = 3] and 14 [n = 1]) [53]. Several studies evaluated the association of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction with antibiotic resistance among pneumococcal serotypes associated with CPP or PnEmp. In Israel (1990–2002), no penicillin-resistant pneumococci were isolated from pediatric CPP [14], whereas in Taiwan (1995–2003), more pneumococcal isolates from pediatric CPP than from lobar pneumonia were intermediately susceptible or resistant to penicillin [9]. In a subsequent study (1996–2005), the penicillin resistance rates in PnEmp declined from 21 % to 12 % (p = 0.3) following PCV7 introduction [73]. Similarly, in Spain (2005–2009), all pneumococcal isolates (n = 34) from pediatric PnEmp were susceptible to penicillin [88]. In Spanish adults (2001–2009), significantly higher proportions of penicillin-susceptible isolates (p = 0.013) were identified from CPP compared with uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia, which was associated with a higher rate of erythromycin resistance (p = 0.033) [74]. Among adults in Spain with IPP, antibiotic resistance decreased and antibiotic susceptibility increased between 1996–2001 and 2005–2009, significantly so for penicillin (p = 0.01) [63]. Likewise, among adults with IPP in Spain (1996–2009), the proportion of cases caused by penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal strains increased from 71.7 % to 80.3 % (p = 0.012), and susceptibility to other antibiotics also trended upward [17].

Effect of age on serotype epidemiology

Age-based differences were observed in pneumococcal serotype proportions. In France (2007), both serotypes 1 (5/10 isolates) and 19A (5/10 isolates) were uniquely isolated from pleural fluid in children with IPD, whereas from pleural fluid in adults, the most frequent was serotype 19A (4/12 isolates) [97]. In Spanish studies, serotype 1 was associated with IPD in older children, whereas serotype 19A predominated in younger children [44, 49, 87, 90]. In Spain (2007–2009), among children aged 3–59 months with IPD, serotype 1 was the most frequent cause of PnEmp (24.9 % of all cases), and serotype 1 IPD was significantly more common in children aged 24–59 months than those aged 3–23 months (adjusted OR, 7.70; 95 % CI, 2.12–10.38) [44]. Serotype 19A-related IPD was noted to be more common among children aged <24 months, although the proportion of cases with PnEmp in this age group was not specified, and serotype 19A was also associated with PnEmp (14.3 % of all cases). In another Spanish study (2003–2006), serotypes 1, 5, 7F, and 14 (i.e., serotypes with higher invasive disease potential) were more frequent causes of PnEmp in older children (median ages 56 months vs. 24 months; p = 0.0001) compared with serotypes 6A, 9V, 19A, and 23F (i.e., serotypes with low invasive disease potential) [87]. This pattern was also evident in pediatric pneumonia in Italy (2007–2009): serotype 1 was only detected in children aged >2 years and was the predominant serotype associated with CPP (50 % of cases), whereas serotype 19A was significantly associated with younger age [32]. In Spanish children with PnEmp (2007–2009), serotype 1 was more common in children aged >36 months, serotype 3 was more common in children aged 24–36-months, and serotype 19A was more common in children aged <24 months [90]. More recently, in a Spanish study of children aged <15 years with PnEmp (2007–2012), the median overall age (52.0 vs. 44.0 months; p = 0.028) and the age of children with serotype 1 disease (74.0 vs. 49.5 months; p = 0.002) was significantly higher one year after the introduction of PCV13 (2011–2012) compared with 2007–2010 [49].

Discussion

The reported proportion of cases of CPP and PnEmp has increased over the past several decades. For example, among children aged <18 years with IPD in Utah (USA), the most common form of IPD had been bacteremia without focus (37 %) during 1997–2000, whereas by 2001–2010, CPP became the most common form of IPD (33 %); the proportion of CPP increased from 17 % (22/128 cases) to 33 % (127/385 cases) (p < 0.001) [18]. Among hospitalized children with IPD in Barcelona (Spain), the mean number of cases of PnEmp increased significantly from 1998–2001 to 2002–2005 (15 vs. 43, respectively; p < 0.02) [101]. Serotypes 1, 19A, 3, 14, and 7F predominated as causes of CPP and empyema. For example, in the USA (1993–2000), the most frequent serotypes causing pediatric CPP were serotypes 14 (29.1 %) and 1 (24.4 %) [34]. In another study in the USA (1996–2001), serotypes 14 (35.0 %), 1 (25.0 %), and 19A (15.0 %) were the most frequent causes of CPP [7]. In a study in Italy among children with CPP (n = 35), serotypes 1 (50.0 %), 3 (13.9 %), and 19A (11.1 %) predominated [32]. After the introduction of PCV7 into pediatric immunization programs, several studies reported increases in the proportion of CPP caused by non-PCV7 serotypes, particularly serotypes 1, 3, 7F, and 19A [17, 18, 31, 35, 50, 52]. In Barcelona (Spain), the proportion of serotype 19A pediatric PE increased from none (0/7) in 1997–2001, to 1/13 cases (8 %) during 2002–2004, to 6/34 cases (18 %) during 2005–2007; these data also reflect an increase in the overall number of pediatric PnEmp cases [86]. PCV7 serotypes and non-PCV7 serotypes caused similar proportions of cases of CPP (51.6 % and 48.4 %, respectively) in children in Taiwan during a period (1998–2010) when PCV7 immunization rates were low (i.e., in 2007, 15.9 % of children aged <5 years had received ≥1 dose), although serotype 3 was significantly more likely to cause CPP compared with lobar pneumonia [48]. While fewer data are available for PnEmp in adults, a Spanish study reported significant increases from 1996–2001 to 2005–2009 in the PnEmp incidence (0.5 to 1.6 cases/100,000 population; p <0.001) and the serotype 1 PnEmp incidence (0.1 to 0.8 cases per 100,000 population; p < 0.001) in adults aged 18–50 years [17]. In England, the serotype 19A incidence for pediatric CPP increased significantly from 0.48 to 2.02 per 1,000,000 children from 2006–2007 to 2010–2011 (incidence rate ratio, 4.17; 95 % CI, 1.53–14.2) [94]. Although in some studies the emergence of serotypes 1, 19A, 3, and 14 in CPP and PnEmp has corresponded to the years following the introduction of PCV7 [17, 18, 31, 35, 50, 52, 86], a few studies demonstrated that their increasing role in CPP and PnEmp began prior to the introduction of PCV7 [28, 29, 68]. For example, in a study of IPD in Spain (1989–2008), the proportion of cases of IPD caused by serotype 1 was increasing prior to the introduction of PCV7, and this trend continued after the introduction of PCV7 (2 %, 8.6 %, 14.9 %, and 23.8 % of cases in 1989–1993, 1994–1998, 1993–2003, and 2004–2008, respectively [p < 0.001]) [68]. This suggests that emergence involves more than simply serotype replacement following PCV7 introduction; characteristics particular to certain serotypes, such as differences in antibiotic sensitivity or their propensity to cause pleural infection, may be responsible for these increases. In addition, several studies established a relationship between the proportion of CPP and age that contrasts with the age-specific incidence of IPD [32, 40, 44, 49, 87, 90, 97], which may suggest an interaction between the propensity of given serotypes to infect and the age-dependent susceptibility of patients to infection by these same serotypes. Recent data suggest that PCV13 may impact on pediatric PnEmp caused by serotypes associated with CPP, such as 1 and 19A. In Spain, where PCV13 was introduced in 2010, the incidence of pediatric PnEmp caused by serotypes targeted by PCV13 declined significantly from 2009–2010 to 2010–2011 (5.52 vs. 3.55 per 100,000 population; p = 0.049), mainly due to reductions in serotypes 1 (2.81 vs. 2.07 per 100,000 population) and 19A (1.51 vs. 0.69 per 100,000 population) [46]. More recently, in children aged <15 years in Spain, the PnEmp incidence declined significantly (p = 0.0019) from 5.72 to. 3.12 per 100,000 population in, respectively, 2007–2010 and 2011–2012, while the median age of children with PnEmp was greater in 2011–2012 (i.e., following PCV13 introduction) than 2007–2010 (47.0 vs. 42.0 months; p = 0.032) [49]. Although this review has recapitulated the basic epidemiology of CPP (including PnEmp) over the past several decades, the increased use of more specific diagnostic imaging (e.g., CT and ultrasound) in recent years may affect the reported rate of PE and empyema because of the more accurate identification. Improved diagnostic methodologies, clinical (ultrasound or CT vs. physical examination or chest X-ray) and microbiological (e.g., PCR vs. culture), as well as increased awareness of and vigilance for PE and empyema may have resulted in an apparent increase in the proportion of CPP over the time period included in this analysis, which, given the limitations of the retrospective nature of this analysis, may be a confounding factor in the determination of any true increase in the proportion of CPP. This review is also limited by the fact that many of the studies used culture to identify pathogens. Culture may be less than ideally sensitive to the presence of specific pathogens because of factors such as prior antibiotic use or other difficulties in culturing pathogens. In recent years, PCR has been applied to identify the pneumococci causing CPP and to identify serotypes in culture-negative specimens [32, 59, 64, 84, 87, 93]. As antibiotic treatment may reduce the likelihood of detecting bacteria via culture, PCR is useful in detecting pneumococci in culture-negative samples from patients previously treated with antibiotics. For example, in a Spanish study of culture-negative pleural fluid specimens from children with empyema, PCR typing identified eight different serotypes (i.e., serotypes 1, 3, 5, 7F/7A, 8, 14, 19A, and 19F/B/C) in 52 of 67 culture-negative pleural fluid samples from children with PnEmp, with a sensitivity of 96.0 % and a specificity of 98.6 % [93]. Spanish pediatric empyema patients with S. pneumoniae culture-negative/PCR-positive samples were found to be significantly more likely to have received antibiotics than those with culture-positive samples (92 % vs. 53 %, respectively; p < 0.0001) [87]. Rapid pneumococcal antigen detection by means of immunochromatography has also been used to detect pneumococci in isolates from patients with empyema [51]. In hospitalized children with parapneumonic effusion, conventional microbiologic culture of pleural fluid samples detected pneumococci in 15 of 55 isolates, real-time PCR detected pneumococci in 13 of 16 culture-negative isolates (81.2 %), and immunochromatographic testing detected pneumococci in 24 of 27 culture-negative isolates (88.9 %) [51]. Such molecular methods may complete the information available on changes in the IPD and CPP serotype epidemiology over time. Finally, most of the studies reviewed here used retrospective database analyses to identify cases of CPP and PnEmp. The specificity of information in these databases could vary, as cases may have been missed due to misclassification. In recent years, increased awareness of CPP and PnEmp has led to prospective surveillance studies, which may enhance disease identification. In addition, studies used different breakpoints to determine penicillin sensitivity, making it difficult to compare antibiotic resistance results. In conclusion, the reported proportion of cases of CPP and PnEmp due to non-PCV7 serotypes has increased over the past several decades in countries that introduced PCV7 into the pediatric immunization program. Whether this increase reflects the advent and wider use of more specific diagnostic methods and increased awareness due to research initiatives, or if it, indeed, represents a true increase in disease incidence, is unclear. Several factors may account for these greater proportions, including enhanced disease detection due to a higher index of suspicion and more sophisticated diagnostic assays, as well as the prevalence of certain non-PCV7 serotypes that are capable of invading the pleural space. It is established that reductions in the proportion of PCV7 serotype CPP have been observed in countries using PCV7. Most serotypes associated with CPP and PnEmp—particularly serotypes 1, 19A, 3, and 7F—are targeted by PCV13, which was registered for pediatric vaccination from 2009 and for adult vaccination from 2011. Early reports suggest declines in the incidence and proportion of cases of vaccine serotype CPP post-PCV7 introduction, and then further with PCV13, although studies are ongoing.
  98 in total

1.  Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 1 causing invasive disease among children in Barcelona over a 20-year period (1989-2008).

Authors:  C Esteva; L Selva; M F de Sevilla; J J Garcia-Garcia; R Pallares; C Muñoz-Almagro
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Molecular analysis improves pathogen identification and epidemiologic study of pediatric parapneumonic empyema.

Authors:  Anne J Blaschke; Caroline Heyrend; Carrie L Byington; Ignacio Obando; Isabel Vazquez-Barba; Elizabeth H Doby; E Kent Korgenski; Xiaoming Sheng; Mark A Poritz; Judy A Daly; Edward O Mason; Andrew T Pavia; Krow Ampofo
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Emergence of parapneumonic empyema in the USA.

Authors:  Carlos G Grijalva; Yuwei Zhu; J Pekka Nuorti; Marie R Griffin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  [Pneumococcal pneumonia in the era of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine].

Authors:  Antoni Payeras; Aroa Villoslada; Margarita Garau; María Borras; Antonio Pareja; David Beingolea; Mercedes García-Gasalla; M del Carmen Gallegos; Carlos José Alonso-Villaverde
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  [Parapneumonic pleural effusion incidence in a French region before and during the antipneumococcal vaccine era].

Authors:  A Masson; C Ménetrey; F Garnier; C Bahans; A Fargeot; M Layadi; J-L Soulier; V Guigonis
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.180

6.  The spectrum of pneumococcal empyema in adults in the early 21st century.

Authors:  Joaquín Burgos; Manel Lujan; Vicenç Falcó; Ana Sánchez; Mireia Puig; Astrid Borrego; Dionisia Fontanals; Ana M Planes; Albert Pahissa; Jordi Rello
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A multiplex polymerase chain reaction method for rapid pneumococcal serotype determination in childhood empyema.

Authors:  Naouale Maataoui; Philippe Bidet; Catherine Doit; Agathe De Lauzanne; Mathie Lorrot; Patricia Mariani-Kurkdjian; Albert Faye; Edouard Bingen
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Laboratory-based, 2-year surveillance of pediatric parapneumonic pneumococcal empyema following heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine universal vaccination in Madrid.

Authors:  Juan Picazo; Jesus Ruiz-Contreras; Juan Casado-Flores; Sagrario Negreira; Fernando Del Castillo; Teresa Hernández-Sampelayo; Mercedes Bueno; Cristina Calvo; Esther Ríos; Cristina Méndez
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Increased incidence of bronchopulmonary fistulas complicating pediatric pneumonia.

Authors:  A J McKee; A Ives; I M Balfour-Lynn
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2011-05-27

Review 10.  Pleural infection: changing bacteriology and its implications.

Authors:  Thiago Lisboa; Grant W Waterer; Y C Gary Lee
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.424

View more
  22 in total

1.  Risk factors for pneumococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  T J Marrie; G J Tyrrell; S R Majumdar; D T Eurich
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Changes in empyema among U.S. children in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era.

Authors:  Andrew D Wiese; Marie R Griffin; Yuwei Zhu; Edward F Mitchel; Carlos G Grijalva
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Pneumococcal serotype distribution: A snapshot of recent data in pediatric and adult populations around the world.

Authors:  Yadong A Cui; Harshila Patel; William M O'Neil; Se Li; Patricia Saddier
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Differential Pneumococcal Growth Features in Severe Invasive Disease Manifestations.

Authors:  Marien I de Jonge; Amelieke J H Cremers; Daan W Arends; Wynand Alkema; Indri Hapsari Putri; Christa E van der Gaast-de Jongh; Marc Eleveld; Jeroen D Langereis; Quirijn de Mast; Jacques F Meis
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 5.  Metabolomics in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections and sepsis: a literature review.

Authors:  Emily Wildman; Beata Mickiewicz; Hans J Vogel; Graham C Thompson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.953

Review 6.  The past, current and future of diagnosis and management of pleural disease.

Authors:  Jason Akulian; David Feller-Kopman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  The rising incidence of pediatric empyema with fistula.

Authors:  T K Pandian; Johnathon M Aho; Daniel S Ubl; Christopher R Moir; Michael B Ishitani; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Interim results of an ecological experiment - Conjugate vaccination against the pneumococcus and serotype replacement.

Authors:  William P Hausdorff; William P Hanage
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A Structural Model for the Ligand Binding of Pneumococcal Serotype 3 Capsular Polysaccharide-Specific Protective Antibodies.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozdilek; Jiachen Huang; Rachelle Babb; Amy V Paschall; Dustin R Middleton; Jeremy A Duke; Liise-Anne Pirofski; Jarrod J Mousa; Fikri Y Avci
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.867

10.  Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 genotypes in invasive isolates from Colombia.

Authors:  Zonia Katerin Alarcón; Carolina Duarte; Olga Sanabria; Jaime Moreno
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 0.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.