Literature DB >> 24563106

Validating the alterable weight loss (AWL) metric with 2-year weight loss outcome of 500 patients after gastric bypass.

A W van de Laar1, M H Dollé, L M de Brauw, S C Bruin, Y I Acherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percentage alterable weight loss (AWL) is the only known weight loss metric independent of the initial body mass index (BMI), a unique feature ideal for use in weight loss research. AWL was not yet validated. The aim of the study is to validate the AWL metric and to confirm advantages over the excess weight loss (EWL) metric.
METHODS: AWL is tested with 2-year weight loss results of all primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients operated in our hospital. Nadir results of patients with higher and lower initial BMI are compared (Mann-Whitney; p < 0.05) using outcome metrics BMI, percentage weight loss (WL), EWL, and AWL, for the whole group, for each gender, and for <40 and ≥40 years separately.
RESULTS: Five-hundred patients (401 female) out of 508 (98.4 %) had 2-year follow-up. Of all four metrics, only AWL rendered results not significantly influenced by initial BMI. The AWL outcome is initial BMI independent for both genders and age-groups. Results also confirm that women and younger patients had significantly higher AWL outcome.
CONCLUSION: The recently developed AWL metric, defined as 100% × (initialBMI - BMI) / (initialBMI - 13), is now validated. In contrast to the well-known outcome metrics BMI, EWL, and WL, the AWL metric is independent of the initial BMI. It should replace the misleading EWL metric for comparing weight loss results in bariatric research and for expressing the effectiveness of bariatric procedures. This effectiveness does not act on the total body mass, or on the excess part, but on the alterable part, defined as BMI minus 13 kg/m(2) for all adult patients, female, male, young, and old.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563106     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1203-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  15 in total

1.  Standards for Reporting Results.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Reporting weight loss 2007.

Authors:  Mervyn Deitel; Khaled Gawdat; John Melissas
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Is it time to abandon excess weight loss in reporting surgical weight loss?

Authors:  Shahzeer Karmali; Daniel W Birch; Arya M Sharma
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  Arnold van de Laar; Laura de Caluwé; Bruno Dillemans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Mortality of eating disorders: a follow-up study of treatment in a specialist unit 1974-2000.

Authors:  Agneta M Rosling; Pär Sparén; Claes Norring; Anne-Liis von Knorring
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.861

6.  Minimal reporting requirements for weight loss: current methods not ideal.

Authors:  John B Dixon; Tracey McPhail; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada.

Authors:  Nicolas Christou; Evangelos Efthimiou
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Weight loss percentile charts of large representative series: a benchmark defining sufficient weight loss challenging current criteria for success of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Arnold W J M van de Laar; Yair I Z Acherman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures, demonstrating better alternatives.

Authors:  Arnold van de Laar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Ida J Hatoum; Lee M Kaplan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  13 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to Editor Entitled "The %EBMIL/%EWL Double-Booby Trap. A Comment on Studies that Compare the Effect of Bariatric Surgery Between Heavier and Lighter Patients".

Authors:  Ji Yeon Park; Yong Jin Kim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The %EBMIL/%EWL Double Booby-Trap. A Comment on Studies that Compare the Effect of Bariatric Surgery Between Heavier and Lighter Patients.

Authors:  A W van de Laar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Which baseline weight should be preferred as reference for weight loss results? Insights in bariatric weight loss mechanisms by comparing primary and revision gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  Arnold W van de Laar; Marije H Dollé; L Maurits de Brauw; Sjoerd C Bruin; Yair I Acherman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Validation of the Alterable Weight Loss Metric in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass in Korea.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Park; Yong Jin Kim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Seeking an Initial-Weight-Independent Metric in a Mediterranean Cohort of Gastric Bypass Patients: the %AWL Revisited.

Authors:  Marc Beisani; Fàtima Sabench Pereferrer; Ramón Vilallonga; Óscar González López; Alicia Molina López; Daniel Del Castillo Dejardin; Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela; José Manuel Fort López-Barajas; Manel Armengol Carrasco
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Effect of Bariatric Surgery on High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol in Non-diabetic Patients with Severe Obesity.

Authors:  Otto Henrique Nienov; Fernanda Dapper Machado; Lisiane Stefani Dias; Luiz Alberto De Carli; Helena Schmid
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Weight-Independent Percentile Chart of 2880 Gastric Bypass Patients: a New Look at Bariatric Weight Loss Results.

Authors:  Arnold W van de Laar; Maurits de Brauw; Sjoerd C Bruin; Yair I Acherman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Usefulness of Baltasar's expected body mass index as an indicator of bariatric weight loss surgery.

Authors:  Alicia Molina López; Fàtima Sabench Pereferrer; Margarida Vives Espelta; Anna Bonada Sanjaume; Santiago Blanco Blasco; Esther Raga Carceller; Mercè Hernández González; Antonio Sánchez Marín; Jordi Salas Salvadó; Daniel Del Castillo Déjardin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Sensitivity and Specificity of 50% Excess Weight Loss (50%EWL) and Twelve Other Bariatric Criteria for Weight Loss Success.

Authors:  Arnold W van de Laar; A S van Rijswijk; H Kakar; S C Bruin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  What Is Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Expressed in Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL)? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk; Nienke van Olst; Winnie Schats; Donald L van der Peet; Arnold W van de Laar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.