Literature DB >> 33398625

Seeking an Initial-Weight-Independent Metric in a Mediterranean Cohort of Gastric Bypass Patients: the %AWL Revisited.

Marc Beisani1, Fàtima Sabench Pereferrer2, Ramón Vilallonga1, Óscar González López3, Alicia Molina López2, Daniel Del Castillo Dejardin2, Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela1, José Manuel Fort López-Barajas1, Manel Armengol Carrasco1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most relative weight-loss metrics follow the formula "Weight loss(%) = 100 · (Initial BMI - Final BMI) / (Initial BMI-a)," where a is the reference point that defines the metric. The percentage of total weight loss (%TWL, a = 0) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL, a = 25) are influenced by a patient's initial weight. Recently, the percentage of alterable weight loss metric (%AWL, a = 13) has been reported to produce initial-weight-independent outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to replicate the methodology used for %AWL determination in a Mediterranean cohort of bariatric patients. SETTINGS: Multicenter study in 10 large hospitals in Spain.
METHODS: Two large prospective databases were retrospectively searched for all primary laparoscopic gastric bypass patients with 2 years of follow-up. Outcomes at nadir were expressed and analyzed with 26 different metrics (a from 0 to 25), looking for the metric whose outcomes produced (1) the lowest coefficient of variation, (2) no differences between initially lighter and heavier patients, and (3) no correlation with patients' initial BMI.
RESULTS: A cohort of 1793 patients was stratified into 4 gender-age groups: younger women (YW, n = 733), older women (OW, n = 674), younger men (YM, n = 197), and older men (OM, n = 189). The calculations suggested an optimal reference point of 18 kg/m2, defining a new metric (percentage of Mediterranean alterable weight loss, %MAWL). When %TWL, %EWL, %AWL, and %MAWL were tested on the whole sample, only %MAWL produced initial-weight-independent results.
CONCLUSIONS: In our Mediterranean cohort of patients, a reference point of 18 (and not 13) yielded initial-weight-independent outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Surgery; Weight loss

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33398625     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05154-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases.

Authors:  Laurent Biertho; Rudolf Steffen; Thomas Ricklin; Fritz F Horber; Alfons Pomp; William B Inabnet; Daniel Herron; Michel Gagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Reply to the Letter to Editor Entitled "The %EBMIL/%EWL Double-Booby Trap. A Comment on Studies that Compare the Effect of Bariatric Surgery Between Heavier and Lighter Patients".

Authors:  Ji Yeon Park; Yong Jin Kim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Total Weight Loss as the Outcome Measure of Choice After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Ricard Corcelles; Mena Boules; Dvir Froylich; Amani Hag; Christopher R Daigle; Ali Aminian; Stacy A Brethauer; Barto Burguera; Philip R Schauer
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Algorithm for weight loss after gastric bypass surgery considering body mass index, gender, and age from the Bariatric Outcome Longitudinal Database (BOLD).

Authors:  Arnold W J M van de Laar
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 5.  Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Stacy A Brethauer; Julie Kim; Maher el Chaar; Pavlos Papasavas; Dan Eisenberg; Ann Rogers; Naveen Ballem; Mark Kligman; Shanu Kothari
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.734

6.  Relative outcome measures for bariatric surgery. Evidence against excess weight loss and excess body mass index loss from a series of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  Arnold van de Laar; Laura de Caluwé; Bruno Dillemans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients.

Authors:  K D Higa; K B Boone; T Ho; O G Davies
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-09

8.  Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database (BOLD) suggests excess weight loss and excess BMI loss to be inappropriate outcome measures, demonstrating better alternatives.

Authors:  Arnold van de Laar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Ida J Hatoum; Lee M Kaplan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Frank Q Nuttall
Journal:  Nutr Today       Date:  2015-04-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  NASH Presence is Associated with a Lower Weight Loss One and 2 Years After Bariatric Surgery in Women with Severe Obesity.

Authors:  Fàtima Sabench; Laia Bertran; Margarita Vives; Marta París; Carmen Aguilar; Salomé Martínez; Jessica Binetti; Monica Real; Alja Alibalic; Cristóbal Richart; Daniel Del Castillo; Teresa Auguet
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.