Literature DB >> 24563017

Comparison of glucose variability assessed by a continuous glucose-monitoring system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus switched from NPH insulin to insulin glargine: the COBIN2 study.

Denisa Janickova Zdarska1, Milan Kvapil, Zdenek Rusavy, Michal Krcma, Jan Broz, Bohumila Krivska, Pavla Kadlecova.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose variability combined with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessments more reliably represents the level of glycemic control. The study was aimed to compare blood glucose variability with insulin glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS), in patients treated with basal insulin using stable dose of oral antidiabetic agents and HbA1c in the range of 4.5-8.0 % International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units. [6.2-9.4 % Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units].
METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients (N = 116) treated for ≥ 2 months with NPH and metformin combined with sulfonylurea or glinide. Glucose variability was measured after a 4-week NPH treatment phase and after a subsequent 12-week glargine treatment phase using CGMS. Based on 72-hour CGMS, glucose variability was assessed by area under the curve [AUC (mmol/L · h)]. Differences (glargine-NPH) in AUC within 24 h in the glucose ranges of ≤ 3.3, ≤ 3.9, 7.5-3.9 (margins excluding), ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L were evaluated. Circadian fluctuation of glucose was assessed by M-value (log-transformation of the deviation from an arbitrary standard).
RESULTS: AUCs of glucose in the lowest ranges (≤ 3.3 and ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) did not change significantly after treatment with glargine. Those in the higher ranges (≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L) were significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all ranges), whereas AUC of glucose in the normal range (3.9-7.5 mmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) at the end of glargine treatment phase. Circadian fluctuation of glucose assessed by M-value showed a significant decrease after glargine treatment (p < 0.003). No significant differences in hypoglycemia confirmed by glucose value ≤ 3.3 mmol/L were found between treatment phases. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00659477.
CONCLUSIONS: As monitored by CGMS, switching from NPH to glargine with active titration shifted glucose from abnormally high to normal levels with reduced fluctuation and without increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563017     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-014-0508-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  15 in total

1.  Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime NPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. HOE 901/3002 Study Group.

Authors:  H Yki-Järvinen; A Dressler; M Ziemen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Hyperglycaemia and the vessel wall: the pathophysiological aspects on the atherosclerotic burden in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Antonio Ceriello
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-05

3.  Glycated albumin increases oxidative stress, activates NF-kappa B and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and stimulates ERK-dependent transforming growth factor-beta 1 production in macrophage RAW cells.

Authors:  Margo P Cohen; Elizabeth Shea; Sheldon Chen; Clyde W Shearman
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  2003-04

4.  Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Hanefeld; S Fischer; U Julius; J Schulze; U Schwanebeck; H Schmechel; H J Ziegelasch; J Lindner
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control?

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Michael Brownlee
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.852

6.  Glycaemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring and endothelial function in the metabolic syndrome and in Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Buscemi; A Re; J A Batsis; M Arnone; A Mattina; G Cerasola; S Verga
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro.

Authors:  M Lepore; S Pampanelli; C Fanelli; F Porcellati; L Bartocci; A Di Vincenzo; C Cordoni; E Costa; P Brunetti; G B Bolli
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Pharmacokinetics of 125I-labeled insulin glargine (HOE 901) in healthy men: comparison with NPH insulin and the influence of different subcutaneous injection sites.

Authors:  D R Owens; P A Coates; S D Luzio; J P Tinbergen; R Kurzhals
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Intermittent high glucose enhances apoptosis related to oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: the role of protein kinase C and NAD(P)H-oxidase activation.

Authors:  Lisa Quagliaro; Ludovica Piconi; Roberta Assaloni; Lucia Martinelli; Enrico Motz; Antonio Ceriello
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of clinical efficacy and economic value in Basalin- and Lantus-treated patients with type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  H Q Li; C F Lu; J Wang; G P Yin; R Sun; X H Xu; B L Liu; F F Li; T Jing; K O Lee; L Ye; J H Ma; X F Su
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  The impact of glycemic variability on diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Heung Yong Jin; Kyung Ae Lee; Tae Sun Park
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.633

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.