Literature DB >> 24562612

When Mad met Bub.

Katharina Overlack1, Veronica Krenn, Andrea Musacchio.   

Abstract

The faithful segregation of chromosomes into daughter cells is essential for cellular and organismal viability. Errors in this process cause aneuploidy, a hallmark of cancer and several congenital diseases. For proper separation, chromosomes attach to microtubules of the mitotic spindle via their kinetochores, large protein structures assembled on centromeric chromatin. Kinetochores are also crucial for a cell cycle feedback mechanism known as the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). The SAC forces cells to remain in mitosis until all chromosomes are properly attached to microtubules. At the beginning of mitosis, the SAC proteins--Mad1, Mad2, Bub1, Bub3, BubR1, Mps1, and Cdc20--are recruited to kinetochores in a hierarchical and interdependent fashion (Fig 1A). There they monitor, in ways that are not fully clarified, the formation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Two studies recently published in EMBO reports by the groups of Silke Hauf and Jakob Nilsson, and a recent study by London and Biggins in Genes & Development, shed new light on the conserved SAC protein Mad1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24562612      PMCID: PMC3989661          DOI: 10.1002/embr.201438574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  10 in total

1.  Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function.

Authors:  D M Brady; K G Hardwick
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells.

Authors:  Bonnie J Howell; Ben Moree; Emily M Farrar; Scott Stewart; Guowei Fang; E D Salmon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting.

Authors:  Soonjoung Kim; Hongbin Sun; Diana R Tomchick; Hongtao Yu; Xuelian Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Anna De Antoni; Chad G Pearson; Daniela Cimini; Julie C Canman; Valeria Sala; Luigi Nezi; Marina Mapelli; Lucia Sironi; Mario Faretta; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  A direct role of Mad1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint beyond Mad2 kinetochore recruitment.

Authors:  Thomas Kruse; Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen; Garry G Sedgwick; Jón Otti Sigurdsson; Werner Streicher; Jesper V Olsen; Jakob Nilsson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Catalytic assembly of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor BubR1-Cdc20 by a Mad2-induced functional switch in Cdc20.

Authors:  Joo Seok Han; Andrew J Holland; Daniele Fachinetti; Anita Kulukian; Bulent Cetin; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  The spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Pablo Lara-Gonzalez; Frederick G Westhorpe; Stephen S Taylor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Mad1 kinetochore recruitment by Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of Bub1 signals the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Nitobe London; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The influence of catalysis on mad2 activation dynamics.

Authors:  Marco Simonetta; Romilde Manzoni; Roberto Mosca; Marina Mapelli; Lucia Massimiliano; Martin Vink; Bela Novak; Andrea Musacchio; Andrea Ciliberto
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Mad1 contribution to spindle assembly checkpoint signalling goes beyond presenting Mad2 at kinetochores.

Authors:  Stephanie Heinrich; Katharina Sewart; Hanna Windecker; Maria Langegger; Nadine Schmidt; Nicole Hustedt; Silke Hauf
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 8.807

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Systems Biology Modeling of Five Pathways for Regulation and Potent Inhibition of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex (APC/C): Pivotal Roles for MCC and BubR1.

Authors:  Bashar Ibrahim
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2015-04-14

2.  Inositol Pyrophosphate Kinase Asp1 Modulates Chromosome Segregation Fidelity and Spindle Function in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Boris Topolski; Visnja Jakopec; Natascha A Künzel; Ursula Fleig
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  An actin-dependent spindle position checkpoint ensures the asymmetric division in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Aïcha Metchat; Manuel Eguren; Julius M Hossain; Antonio Z Politi; Sébastien Huet; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Stressing mitosis to death.

Authors:  Andrew Burgess; Mina Rasouli; Samuel Rogers
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A molecular basis for the differential roles of Bub1 and BubR1 in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Katharina Overlack; Ivana Primorac; Mathijs Vleugel; Veronica Krenn; Stefano Maffini; Ingrid Hoffmann; Geert J P L Kops; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  BubR1 Promotes Bub3-Dependent APC/C Inhibition during Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling.

Authors:  Katharina Overlack; Tanja Bange; Florian Weissmann; Alex C Faesen; Stefano Maffini; Ivana Primorac; Franziska Müller; Jan-Michael Peters; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Mps1Mph1 Kinase Phosphorylates Mad3 to Inhibit Cdc20Slp1-APC/C and Maintain Spindle Checkpoint Arrests.

Authors:  Judith Zich; Karen May; Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos; Onur Sen; Heather M Syred; Sjaak van der Sar; Hitesh Patel; James J Moresco; Ali Sarkeshik; John R Yates; Juri Rappsilber; Kevin G Hardwick
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Gene signatures and prognostic analyses of the Tob/BTG pituitary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG) family in clinical breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Chung-Che Wu; Titus Ime Ekanem; Nam Nhut Phan; Do Thi Thuy Loan; Sz-Ying Hou; Kuen-Haur Lee; Chih-Yang Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.