BACKGROUND: The majority of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and among patients with diabetes, 40% have at least three. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand how the number, type, and severity of comorbidities influence diabetes patients' self-management and treatment priorities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observation study. PATIENTS: A total of 1,901 diabetes patients who responded to the 2003 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) diabetes survey. MEASUREMENTS: We constructed multivariate models to assess the association between presence of comorbidities and each of 2 self-reported outcomes, diabetes prioritization and self-management ability, controlling for patient demographics. Comorbidity was characterized first by a count of all comorbid conditions, then by the presence of specific comorbidity subtypes (microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes related), and finally by severity of 1 serious comorbidity: heart failure (HF). RESULTS: 40% of respondents had at least 1 microvascular comorbidity, 79% at least 1 macrovascular comorbidity, and 61% at least 1 non-diabetes-related comorbidity. Patients with a greater overall number of comorbidities placed lower priority on diabetes and had worse diabetes self-management ability scores. However, only macrovascular and non-diabetes-related comorbidities, but not microvascular comorbidities, were associated with lower diabetes prioritization, whereas higher numbers of microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes-related conditions were all associated with lower diabetes self-management ability scores. Severe, but not mild, HF was associated with lower diabetes prioritization and self-management scores. CONCLUSIONS: The type and severity of comorbid conditions, and not just the comorbidity count, influence diabetes patients' self-management. Patients with severely symptomatic comorbidities and those with conditions they consider to be unrelated to diabetes may need additional support in making decisions about care priorities and self-management activities.
BACKGROUND: The majority of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and among patients with diabetes, 40% have at least three. OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand how the number, type, and severity of comorbidities influence diabetespatients' self-management and treatment priorities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observation study. PATIENTS: A total of 1,901 diabetespatients who responded to the 2003 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) diabetes survey. MEASUREMENTS: We constructed multivariate models to assess the association between presence of comorbidities and each of 2 self-reported outcomes, diabetes prioritization and self-management ability, controlling for patient demographics. Comorbidity was characterized first by a count of all comorbid conditions, then by the presence of specific comorbidity subtypes (microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes related), and finally by severity of 1 serious comorbidity: heart failure (HF). RESULTS: 40% of respondents had at least 1 microvascular comorbidity, 79% at least 1 macrovascular comorbidity, and 61% at least 1 non-diabetes-related comorbidity. Patients with a greater overall number of comorbidities placed lower priority on diabetes and had worse diabetes self-management ability scores. However, only macrovascular and non-diabetes-related comorbidities, but not microvascular comorbidities, were associated with lower diabetes prioritization, whereas higher numbers of microvascular, macrovascular, and non-diabetes-related conditions were all associated with lower diabetes self-management ability scores. Severe, but not mild, HF was associated with lower diabetes prioritization and self-management scores. CONCLUSIONS: The type and severity of comorbid conditions, and not just the comorbidity count, influence diabetespatients' self-management. Patients with severely symptomatic comorbidities and those with conditions they consider to be unrelated to diabetes may need additional support in making decisions about care priorities and self-management activities.
Authors: Michele Heisler; Reynard R Bouknight; Rodney A Hayward; Dylan M Smith; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; John F Steiner; Douglas H Fernald; Lori A Crane; Deborah S Main Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; Bharati Bhardwaja; Colleen Ross; Arne Beck; Diane M Lanese Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Tito Borner; Jayme L Workinger; Ian C Tinsley; Samantha M Fortin; Lauren M Stein; Oleg G Chepurny; George G Holz; Aleksandra J Wierzba; Dorota Gryko; Ebba Nexø; Evan D Shaulson; Ankur Bamezai; Valentina A Rodriguez Da Silva; Bart C De Jonghe; Matthew R Hayes; Robert P Doyle Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Matthew L Maciejewski; Benjamin J Powers; Linda L Sanders; Joel F Farley; Richard A Hansen; Betsy Sleath; Corrine I Voils Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; Yinghui Miao; Kathy Z Fung; Kelly L Moore; Janice B Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sandra B Dunbar; Brittany Butts; Carolyn M Reilly; Rebecca A Gary; Melinda K Higgins; Erin P Ferranti; Steven D Culler; Javed Butler Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Donna M Zulman; Susana B Martins; Yan Liu; Samson W Tu; Brian B Hoffman; Steven M Asch; Mary K Goldstein Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2015-11-05