Darren T Beck 1 , Jeffrey S Martin 2 , Wilmer W Nichols 3 , Alvaro N Gurovich 4 , Randy W Braith 5 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central hemodynamic and augmentation indices are independent predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that can be estimated noninvasively by pulse wave analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a newly engineered wristband tonometer for acquiring radial artery pressure waveforms. METHODS: Radial artery pulse pressure waveforms were evaluated with an established pencil-type and a novel wristband tonometer in 31 participants (aged 30.2±9.5 years) resting in a supine position. Pulse wave analysis was executed using the same validated generalized transfer function (SphygmoCor) for both tonometers. RESULTS: A significant difference in time to data acquisition between tonometers was observed (-70.2±147.7 s; P < 0.05; wristband faster). The wristband tonometer had significantly lower within-subject coefficients of variation (CV) compared with the pencil-type tonometer in aortic pulse wave height (-2.67% ± 5.51%; P < 0.05) and time to reflection (-2.26% ± 6.16%; P < 0.01). No other differences in CV were observed. Slight but statistically significant mean differences between tonometers were observed in aortic systolic blood pressure (ASBP; 0.43±1.08 mm Hg; P < 0.05; wristband lower), aortic pulse pressure (APP; 0.43±0.96 mm Hg; P < 0.05; wristband lower), and round-trip travel time of the reflected pressure wave (Δtp; 3.58±12.86 ms; P < 0.05; wristband higher). However, ASBP, APP, and Δtp measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.9970, r = 0.9953, and r = 0.8838, respectively, P <0.0001) between tonometers; within-subject and between tonometer significant mean differences were within clinical ranges. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, hands-free platform may be interchangeable with the commonly used pencil-type tonometer, heralding new directions in noninvasive in vivo vascular research and clinical application. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
BACKGROUND: Central hemodynamic and augmentation indices are independent predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality that can be estimated noninvasively by pulse wave analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a newly engineered wristband tonometer for acquiring radial artery pressure waveforms. METHODS: Radial artery pulse pressure waveforms were evaluated with an established pencil-type and a novel wristband tonometer in 31 participants (aged 30.2±9.5 years) resting in a supine position. Pulse wave analysis was executed using the same validated generalized transfer function (SphygmoCor) for both tonometers. RESULTS: A significant difference in time to data acquisition between tonometers was observed (-70.2±147.7 s; P < 0.05; wristband faster). The wristband tonometer had significantly lower within-subject coefficients of variation (CV) compared with the pencil-type tonometer in aortic pulse wave height (-2.67% ± 5.51%; P < 0.05) and time to reflection (-2.26% ± 6.16%; P < 0.01). No other differences in CV were observed. Slight but statistically significant mean differences between tonometers were observed in aortic systolic blood pressure (ASBP; 0.43±1.08 mm Hg; P < 0.05; wristband lower), aortic pulse pressure (APP; 0.43±0.96 mm Hg; P < 0.05; wristband lower), and round-trip travel time of the reflected pressure wave (Δtp; 3.58±12.86 ms; P < 0.05; wristband higher). However, ASBP, APP, and Δtp measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.9970, r = 0.9953, and r = 0.8838, respectively, P <0.0001) between tonometers; within-subject and between tonometer significant mean differences were within clinical ranges. CONCLUSIONS: This novel, hands-free platform may be interchangeable with the commonly used pencil-type tonometer, heralding new directions in noninvasive in vivo vascular research and clinical application. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2014. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities: Species
Keywords:
applanation tonometry; arterial stiffness; augmentation index; blood pressure; hypertension; pulse wave analysis
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2014
PMID： 24561655 DOI： 10.1093/ajh/hpt300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hypertens ISSN： 0895-7061 Impact factor: 2.689