Mathew Williams1, Susheel K Kodali2, Rebecca T Hahn1, Karin H Humphries3, Vuyisile T Nkomo4, David J Cohen5, Pamela S Douglas6, Michael Mack7, Thomas C McAndrew8, Lars Svensson9, Vinod H Thourani10, E Murat Tuzcu9, Neil J Weissman11, Ajay J Kirtane1, Martin B Leon1. 1. Herbert and Sandi Feinberg Interventional Cardiology and Heart Valve Center at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. 2. Herbert and Sandi Feinberg Interventional Cardiology and Heart Valve Center at Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. Electronic address: sk2427@columbia.edu. 3. Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri. 6. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 7. Baylor Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas. 8. Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York. 9. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. 10. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 11. Medstar Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine sex-specific differences in outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. BACKGROUND: The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) trial demonstrated similar 2-year survival with SAVR or TAVR for high-risk patients, but sex-specific outcomes are unknown. METHODS: In all, 699 patients (300 female) were randomly assigned 1:1 to either SAVR or TAVR with a balloon expandable pericardial tissue valve. Baseline characteristics and 2-year outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR were compared among males and females. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics differed between the sexes. Despite higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk scores (11.9 vs. 11.6; p = 0.05), female patients had lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (64.4% vs. 83.7%), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (19.8% vs. 61.2%), peripheral vascular disease (36.4% vs. 46.9%), diabetes mellitus (35.6% vs. 45.6%), and elevated creatinine (11.7% vs. 23.9%). Among female patients, procedural mortality trended lower with TAVR versus SAVR (6.8% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.07) and was maintained throughout follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44 to 1.00; p = 0.049), driven by the transfemoral arm (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.93; p = 0.02). Among male patients, although procedural mortality was lower with TAVR (6% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.03), there was no overall survival benefit (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.61; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective subanalysis of high-risk, symptomatic aortic stenosis patients in the PARTNER trial, female subjects had lower late mortality with TAVR versus SAVR. This was especially true among patients suitable for transfemoral access and suggests that TAVR may be preferred over surgery for high-risk female patients. A randomized, controlled trial conducted specifically in female patients is necessary to properly study differences in mortality between treatment modalities. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine sex-specific differences in outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. BACKGROUND: The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) trial demonstrated similar 2-year survival with SAVR or TAVR for high-risk patients, but sex-specific outcomes are unknown. METHODS: In all, 699 patients (300 female) were randomly assigned 1:1 to either SAVR or TAVR with a balloon expandable pericardial tissue valve. Baseline characteristics and 2-year outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR were compared among males and females. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics differed between the sexes. Despite higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk scores (11.9 vs. 11.6; p = 0.05), female patients had lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (64.4% vs. 83.7%), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (19.8% vs. 61.2%), peripheral vascular disease (36.4% vs. 46.9%), diabetes mellitus (35.6% vs. 45.6%), and elevated creatinine (11.7% vs. 23.9%). Among female patients, procedural mortality trended lower with TAVR versus SAVR (6.8% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.07) and was maintained throughout follow-up (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44 to 1.00; p = 0.049), driven by the transfemoral arm (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.93; p = 0.02). Among male patients, although procedural mortality was lower with TAVR (6% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.03), there was no overall survival benefit (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.61; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective subanalysis of high-risk, symptomatic aortic stenosispatients in the PARTNER trial, female subjects had lower late mortality with TAVR versus SAVR. This was especially true among patients suitable for transfemoral access and suggests that TAVR may be preferred over surgery for high-risk female patients. A randomized, controlled trial conducted specifically in female patients is necessary to properly study differences in mortality between treatment modalities. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).
Authors: Travis R Sexton; Eric L Wallace; Amy Chen; Richard J Charnigo; Hassan K Reda; Khaled M Ziada; John C Gurley; Susan S Smyth Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller Journal: Physiology (Bethesda) Date: 2017-05
Authors: Juyong Brian Kim; Yukari Kobayashi; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Kegan J Moneghetti; Daniel A Brenner; Ryan O'Malley; Catherine Dao; Joseph C Wu; Michael Fischbein; D Craig Miller; Alan C Yeung; David Liang; Francois Haddad; William F Fearon Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Hind A Beydoun; May A Beydoun; Hailun Liang; Greg A Dore; Danielle Shaked; Alan B Zonderman; Shaker M Eid Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 2.778