Preethi Srikanthan1, Arun S Karlamangla2. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif. Electronic address: psrikanthan@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obesity (as defined by body mass index) has not been associated consistently with higher mortality in older adults. However, total body mass includes fat and muscle, which have different metabolic effects. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that greater muscle mass in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality. METHODS: All-cause mortality was analyzed by the year 2004 in 3659 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III who were aged 55 years or more (65 years if women) at the time of the survey (1988-1994). Individuals who were underweight or died in the first 2 years of follow-up were excluded to remove frail elders from the sample. Skeletal muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance, and muscle mass index was defined as muscle mass divided by height squared. Modified Poisson regression and proportional hazards regression were used to examine the relationship of muscle mass index with all-cause mortality risk and rate, respectively, adjusted for central obesity (waist hip ratio) and other significant covariates. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, total mortality was significantly lower in the fourth quartile of muscle mass index compared with the first quartile: adjusted risk ratio 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.91) and adjusted hazard ratio 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the survival predication ability of relative muscle mass and highlights the need to look beyond total body mass in assessing the health of older adults.
OBJECTIVE:Obesity (as defined by body mass index) has not been associated consistently with higher mortality in older adults. However, total body mass includes fat and muscle, which have different metabolic effects. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that greater muscle mass in older adults is associated with lower all-cause mortality. METHODS: All-cause mortality was analyzed by the year 2004 in 3659 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III who were aged 55 years or more (65 years if women) at the time of the survey (1988-1994). Individuals who were underweight or died in the first 2 years of follow-up were excluded to remove frail elders from the sample. Skeletal muscle mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance, and muscle mass index was defined as muscle mass divided by height squared. Modified Poisson regression and proportional hazards regression were used to examine the relationship of muscle mass index with all-cause mortality risk and rate, respectively, adjusted for central obesity (waist hip ratio) and other significant covariates. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, total mortality was significantly lower in the fourth quartile of muscle mass index compared with the first quartile: adjusted risk ratio 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.91) and adjusted hazard ratio 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the survival predication ability of relative muscle mass and highlights the need to look beyond total body mass in assessing the health of older adults.
Authors: Justin D Crane; Michaela C Devries; Adeel Safdar; Mazen J Hamadeh; Mark A Tarnopolsky Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Matlooba A AlZadjali; Valerie Godfrey; Faisel Khan; AnnaMaria Choy; Alexander S Doney; Aaron K Wong; John R Petrie; Allan D Struthers; Chim C Lang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Xuemei Sui; Michael J LaMonte; James N Laditka; James W Hardin; Nancy Chase; Steven P Hooker; Steven N Blair Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A M Carroll; R Cheng; E S R Collie-Duguid; C Meharg; M E Scholz; S Fiering; J L Fields; A A Palmer; A Lionikas Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Michael L Rossetti; Karyn A Esser; Choogon Lee; Robert J Tomko; Alexey M Eroshkin; Bradley S Gordon Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Kaleen M Lavin; Brandon M Roberts; Christopher S Fry; Tatiana Moro; Blake B Rasmussen; Marcas M Bamman Journal: Physiology (Bethesda) Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Nathan Hodson; Daniel W D West; Andrew Philp; Nicholas A Burd; Daniel R Moore Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 4.249