Literature DB >> 24560938

A simple and rapid decalcification procedure of skeletal tissues for pathology using an ultrasonic cleaner with D-mannitol and formic acid.

Hideki Hatta1, Koichi Tsuneyama2, Kazuhiro Nomoto1, Shinichi Hayashi1, Shigeharu Miwa1, Takahiko Nakajima1, Takeshi Nishida1, Yuko Nakanishi1, Johji Imura1.   

Abstract

Decalcification procedures are required in order to prepare histopathological preparations of hard tissues such as bone and teeth. Decalcification is usually performed by immersing the hard tissue in different decalcification fluids with various properties. These decalcification fluids typically include inorganic and organic acids, a neutral fluid containing a chelating agent, or a mixture of solutions. Unfortunately, there is no universal decalcification fluid that satisfies all the requirements of pathologists such as rapid decalcification, easy handling, and minimal tissue damage. Techniques involving use of microwaves (MW) or ultrasonic apparatus (US) have been shown to be useful for shortening the time for decalcification procedures. In the present study, we investigated a unique decalcification procedure that uses a common commercial ultrasonic cleaner and a decalcification fluid (formic acid) containing a free-radical scavenger (D-mannitol). The time required to complete the procedure is approximately half of that required to complete a standard decalcification procedure. In addition, tissue morphology and antigenicity is fairly well preserved after decalcification. The procedure is quick, easy to perform, and achieves decalcification of hard tissue with minimal tissue damage.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cavitation; D-Mannitol; Decalcification; Immunostaining; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24560938     DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2014.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Histochem        ISSN: 0065-1281            Impact factor:   2.479


  5 in total

1.  Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.

Authors:  Kristofor Bogoevski; Anna Woloszyk; Keith Blackwood; Maria A Woodruff; Vaida Glatt
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  The study of calcified atherosclerotic arteries: an alternative to evaluate the composition of a problematic tissue reveals new insight including metakaryotic cells.

Authors:  Silvia Fittipaldi; Francesco Vasuri; Alessio Degiovanni; Rodolfo Pini; Mauro Gargiulo; Andrea Stella; Gianandrea Pasquinelli; William G Thilly; Elena V Gostjeva
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29

3.  Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.

Authors:  Haixia Liu; Ruyuan Zhu; Chenyue Liu; Rufeng Ma; Lili Wang; Beibei Chen; Lin Li; Jianzhao Niu; Dandan Zhao; Fangfang Mo; Min Fu; Dieter Brömme; Dongwei Zhang; Sihua Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Dick H Chow; Lizhen Zheng; Li Tian; Kam-Sing Ho; Ling Qin; Xia Guo
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Scalable method for micro-CT analysis enables large scale quantitative characterization of brain lesions and implants.

Authors:  David B Kastner; Viktor Kharazia; Rhino Nevers; Clay Smyth; Daniela A Astudillo-Maya; Greer M Williams; Zhounan Yang; Cristofer M Holobetz; Luca Della Santina; Dilworth Y Parkinson; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.