Literature DB >> 31090479

Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.

Kristofor Bogoevski1, Anna Woloszyk2, Keith Blackwood1, Maria A Woodruff1, Vaida Glatt1,2.   

Abstract

Conventional bone decalcification is a time-consuming process and is therefore unsuitable for clinical applications and time-limited research projects. Consequently, we compared the effect of four different decalcification solutions applied at three different temperatures, and assessed the rate of decalcification and the implications on tissue morphology and antigenicity of mouse and rat tibiae. Bones were decalcified with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% formic acid, 5% hydrochloric acid, and 5% nitric acid at 4C, 25C, and 37C. Decalcification in both species was fastest in nitric acid at 37C and slowest in EDTA at 4C. Histological and immunohistochemical staining confirmed that the conventional protocols of EDTA at 4C and 25C remain the best option regarding the quality of tissue preservation. Whereas formic acid at 4C is a good alternative saving about 90% of the decalcification time, hydrochloric and nitric acids should be avoided particularly in case of rat tibia. By contrast, due to their smaller size, mouse tibiae had shorter decalcification times and tolerated higher temperatures and exposure to acids much better. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that depending on the specific research question and sample size, alternative decalcification methods could be used to decrease the time of decalcification while maintaining histological accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDTA; bone histology; formic acid; hydrochloric acid; immunohistochemistry; mineralized tissues; mouse; nitric acid; rat; tibia

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090479      PMCID: PMC6669861          DOI: 10.1369/0022155419850099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  43 in total

1.  Rapid decalcification using microwaves for in situ hybridization in skeletal tissues.

Authors:  M Kaneko; T Tomita; T Nakase; E Takeuchi; M Iwasaki; K Sugamoto; K Yonenobu; T Ochi
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Effects of fixation and decalcification on the immunohistochemical localization of bone matrix proteins in fresh-frozen bone sections.

Authors:  Akihiro Hosoya; Kazuto Hoshi; Noriyuki Sahara; Tadashi Ninomiya; Syoji Akahane; Tadafumi Kawamoto; Hidehiro Ozawa
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 3.  Technical pitfalls potentially affecting diagnoses in immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  G Bussolati; E Leonardo
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Microwave decalcification of human temporal bones.

Authors:  C D Cunningham; B A Schulte; L M Bianchi; P C Weber; B N Schmiedt
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  von Willebrand factor is the most reliable immunohistochemical marker for megakaryocytes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myeloproliferative disorders.

Authors:  S S Chuang; Y C Jung; C Y Li; Y C Yung
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Temporal expression of proteoglycans in the rat limb during bone healing.

Authors:  S J Song; D Hutmacher; V Nurcombe; S M Cool
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Microwave-induced fast decalcification of rat bone for electron microscopic analysis: an ultrastructural and cytochemical study.

Authors:  Dimitrius Leonardo Pitol; Flavio Henrique Caetano; Laurelúcia Orive Lunardi
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2007

8.  Models of tibial fracture healing in normal and Nf1-deficient mice.

Authors:  Aaron Schindeler; Alyson Morse; Lorraine Harry; Craig Godfrey; Kathy Mikulec; Michelle McDonald; Jürg A Gasser; David G Little
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Call for a European programme in external quality assurance for bone marrow immunohistochemistry; report of a European Bone Marrow Working Group pilot study.

Authors:  E E Torlakovic; K Naresh; M Kremer; J van der Walt; E Hyjek; A Porwit
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Choice of fixative is crucial to successful immunohistochemical detection of phosphoproteins in paraffin-embedded tumor tissues.

Authors:  Janine A Burns; Yuan Li; Carol A Cheney; Yangsi Ou; Laura L Franlin-Pfeifer; Nelly Kuklin; Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Novel polychrome staining distinguishing osteochondral tissue and bone cells in decalcified paraffin sections.

Authors:  Teppei Nakamura; Kanako Sumi; Erika Tsuji; Marina Hosotani; Takashi Namba; Osamu Ichii; Takao Irie; Ken-Ichi Nagasaki; Yasuhiro Kon; Takashi Mishima; Tomoji Yoshiyasu
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.249

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.