Literature DB >> 24560223

The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section.

Chin-Shyan Chen1, Tsai-Ching Liu2, Bradley Chen3, Chung-Liang Lin4.   

Abstract

Two policy interventions in Taiwan aiming to slow the growth of cesarean delivery utilization were respectively implemented in 2005 and 2006. The first policy provided financial incentives to encourage vaginal delivery by setting a global fee for obstetric services and in essence increasing the reimbursement for vaginal delivery up to the same level of cesarean section. The second policy aimed to reduce the demand for elective cesarean procedure by employing a copayment when cesarean section is not medically indicated. This paper examines the impact of financial incentives of both the supply and the demand side on the use of utilization of cesarean section using data from the 2003-2008 National Health Insurance Research Database. We found that while the overall trend of cesarean utilization did not seem to respond to the interventions, the policies did have significant impact on its elective use. Financial incentives for the providers do matter, and policy interventions, such as a fee change, are still important strategies to consider in reducing the over-utilization of cesarean section.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Elective; Fee; Financial incentive; Policy intervention; Taiwan

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24560223     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Impact of Provider Competition under Global Budgeting on the Use of Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Bradley Chen; Chin-Shyan Chen; Tsai-Ching Liu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

3.  Cesarean section in China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong-A safe choice for women and clinicians?

Authors:  Mairead Black; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Caesarean Section vs. Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Game Theory Discussion in Reimbursement Interventions.

Authors:  Marita Mohammadshahi; Hasan Hematyar; Masoumeh Najafi; Minoo Alipouri Sakha; Abolghasem Pourreza
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Carol Kingdon; Fan Yang; Michael Dominic Renecle; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Meghan A Bohren; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Yung-Hsiang Ying; George Linn; Koyin Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Women's decision-making processes and the influences on their mode of birth following a previous caesarean section in Taiwan: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shu-Wen Chen; Alison M Hutchinson; Cate Nagle; Tracey K Bucknall
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Reducing the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request through institutional and policy interventions in Wenzhou, China.

Authors:  Yushan Yu; Xiangyang Zhang; Caixia Sun; Huijie Zhou; Qi Zhang; Chun Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions.

Authors:  Newton Opiyo; Claire Young; Jennifer Harris Requejo; Joanna Erdman; Sarah Bales; Ana Pilar Betrán
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.