Literature DB >> 24559898

Penile cancer--Guideline adherence produces optimum results.

K J Breen1, K M O'Connor2, D G Power3, N J Mayer4, E Rogers2, P Sweeney2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To audit the management and outcome of penile cancer in a tertiary university teaching hospital, comparing our results to international best practice and published guidelines.
METHODS: The Hospital Inpatient Enquiry database of the Mercy University Hospital was interrogated for penile cancer patients treated between 2001 and 2012. Data relating to presentation, local treatment, histology, lymph-node management, outcome and survival was recorded. Data were analysed using the Log Rank test, with significance defined as P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified with a median age of 61 years. The majority of cases at presentation were ≥ T2 (54%) and intermediate to high grade (76%). The median follow-up of patients was 3.75 years (range 9 months-10 years). Overall survival was 76% (n = 19), these patients are all disease free to date. Disease-specific survival was 85% at 10 years. Penile cancer related mortality was 8% (n = 2), 4 patients (16%) died of non-penile cancer related causes. Twenty-two patients (88%) had surgery and 3 patients (12%) had radiotherapy. Based on EAU guidelines inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) was performed in 64% (n = 16) of cases with 44% (n = 7) of these patients requiring concurrent bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Fifty percent (n = 8) of ILNDs showed metastatic disease. Ten year disease-specific survival for node negative versus node positive disease is 100% versus 57%. Thirty-two percent (n = 8) of patients received chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile cancer is a rare oncological condition that often requires bilateral inguinal ± pelvic lymph node dissection and should be managed according to published guidelines, in specialist centres in order to maximize outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EAU guidelines; Inguinal lymph node dissection; Lymph nodes; Penile cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559898     DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgeon        ISSN: 1479-666X            Impact factor:   2.392


  4 in total

Review 1.  Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.

Authors:  Joren Vanthoor; Anita Thomas; Igor Tsaur; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Adherence to the EAU guideline recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in penile cancer: results of the E-PROPS study group survey.

Authors:  F A Distler; S Pahernik; G Gakis; G Hutterer; S Lebentrau; M Rink; P Nuhn; S Brookman-May; M Burger; C Gratzke; I Wolff; M May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Edward K Chang; Rishi R Sekar; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan L Wright; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2021-05-01

4.  The Development and Validation of a Nomogram Incorporating Clinical, Pathological, and Therapeutic Features to Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Penile Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Ruidan Li; Ke Cheng; Zhigong Wei; Zheran Liu; Xingchen Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.