Literature DB >> 24559462

Health state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplasty.

Sheeraz Qureshi1, Vadim Goz, Steven McAnany, Samuel K Cho, Andrew C Hecht, Rick B Delamarter, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of medical interventions has become increasingly relevant to the discussion of optimization of care. The use of utility scales in CEA permits a quantitative assessment of effectiveness of a given intervention. There are no published utility values for degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR). The purpose of this study was to define health utility values for those health states.
METHODS: The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey data from the ProDisc-C investigational device exemption study were obtained for single-level DDD at baseline and 24 months postoperatively after ACDF or CDR procedures. Patients in the original study were randomized to either ACDF or CDR. Utilizing a commercially available Short Form-6 dimensions program, utility scores were calculated for each health state using a set of parametric preference weights obtained from a sample of the general population using the recognized valuation technique of standard gamble.
RESULTS: The baseline health state utility (HSU) value for a patient with single-level DDD was 0.54 in both the ACDF and CDR groups. Postoperative changes in HSU values were seen in both intervention groups at 24 months. Cervical disc replacement had a HSU value of 0.72. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was found to have a postoperative utility state of 0.71. No statistically significant difference was found in the HSU for ACDF and CDR at 24 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first calculated HSU value for a patient with single-level cervical DDD. Additionally, 2 common treatment interventions for this disease state were assessed. Both treatments were found to have significant impact on the HSU values. These values are integral to future CEA of ACDF and CDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559462     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  11 in total

1.  Long Term Societal Costs of Anterior Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) for Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Ahmer Ghori; Joseph F Konopka; Heeren Makanji; Thomas D Cha; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 2.  Artificial disc replacement in spine surgery.

Authors:  Yahya A Othman; Ravi Verma; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of anterior surgical decompression surgery for cervical degenerative disk disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  V N E Schuermans; A Y J M Smeets; A F M Boselie; O Zarrouk; S M M Hermans; R Droeghaag; I Curfs; S M A A Evers; H van Santbrink
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

5.  ISASS Policy Statement - cervical interbody.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 6.  The Mobi-C cervical disc for one-level and two-level cervical disc replacement: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew D Alvin; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-11-26

7.  Early clinical and radiographical results of keel-less and shallow keel cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Ji Min Ling; Rajendra Tiruchelvarayan
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Comparing the 5-Year Health State Utility Value of Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Steven J McAnany; Robert K Merrill; Robert L Brochin; Samuel C Overley; Jun S Kim; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28

9.  Investigating the 7-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Single-Level Cervical Disc Replacement Compared to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Steven J McAnany; Robert K Merrill; Samuel C Overley; Jun S Kim; Robert L Brochin; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-08-17

10.  Validating the Transformation of PROMIS-GH to EQ-5D in Adult Spine Patients.

Authors:  Shreyas Panchagnula; Xin Sun; Julio D Montejo; Aria Nouri; Luis Kolb; Justin Virojanapa; Joaquin Q Camara-Quintana; Samuel Sommaruga; Kishan Patel; Nikita Lakomkin; Khalid Abbed; Joseph S Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.