| Literature DB >> 24558405 |
Rajeshwary Ghosh1, Udayan Ray2, Pradipta Jana1, Rabindra Bhattacharya3, Debipriya Banerjee1, Asru Sinha1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Excessive aggregation of platelets at the site of plaque rupture on the coronary artery led to the formation of thrombus which is reported to precipitate acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nitric oxide (NO) has been reported to inhibit platelet aggregation and induce thrombolysis through the in situ formation of plasmin. As the plasma NO level in AMI patients from two different ethnic groups was reduced to 0 µM (median) compared to 4.0 µM (median) in normal controls, the effect of restoration of the NO level to normal ranges on the rate of death due to AMI was determined. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24558405 PMCID: PMC3928291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flowchart representing the participation of the subjects with different cancers who received “antineoplastin” treatment.
Patients with different cancers were selected for the study and “antineoplastin” pad consisting of 0.2 ml of the solution (0.28 mmol of SNP) soaked in a band-aid was applied dermally on the lower abdominal hair-free area as described before [28]. Please note that the whole process of delivering the “pad” containing “antineoplastin” takes less than 5 min. People from different parts of the world belonging to multi-ethnic and multi-cultural backgrounds have participated in the study including India, Poland, Papua New Guinea, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. They had used this “antineoplastin” pad for at least a year with a maximum duration of 5 years.
Characterization of the acute myocardial infarction in patients selected for the study.
| ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (INDIAN PATIENTS) (n = 55; M = 45; F = 10) | ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (AUSTRALIAN PATIENTS) (n = 70; M = 56; F = 14) | ||||||||
| No. of patients | Gender and Age | Co-morbidities and cardiovascular risk factors | NO (nmol/h) | Medications | No. of patients | Gender and Age | Co-morbidities and cardiovascular risk factors | NO(nmol/h) | Medications |
| 1 | M (65) | - | 0 | - | 1 | M(70) | HYP; Smoker | 0.001 |
|
| 2 | M(70) | Smoker; DM | 0.002 |
| 2 | M(47) | - | 0.021 | - |
| 3 | M(47) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 3 | M(54) | - | 0.051 | - |
| 4 | M(55) | - | 0.12 | - | 4 | M(57) | Smoker | 0 | - |
| 5 | M(75) | HYP | 0 |
| 5 | M(55) | HYP; DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 6 | F(70) | DM | 0 |
| 6 | M (65) | - | 0.021 | - |
| 7 | M(76) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
| 7 | M(59) | - | 0.054 | - |
| 8 | M(59) | HYP | 0 |
| 8 | M(65) | - | 0.21 | - |
| 9 | M(65) | Smoker | 0.25 | - | 9 | M(68) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 10 | M(68) | - | 0.55 | - | 10 | F(65) | HYP;DM | 0 |
|
| 11 | F(65) | HYP | 0 |
| 11 | M(68) | HYP | 0 | - |
| 12 | F(70) | DM | 0 |
| 12 | M(58) | - | 0 | - |
| 13 | M(68) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 13 | F(71) | HYP | 0 |
|
| 14 | M(72) | - | 0.5 | - | 14 | F(75) | HYP;DM | 0 |
|
| 15 | M(71) | DM; Smoker | 0.7 |
| 15 | M(56) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 16 | F(65) | DM | 0 |
| 16 | M(50) | HYP | 0.002 |
|
| 17 | M(56) | HYP; Smoker | 0.3 | - | 17 | F(52) | - | 0 | - |
| 18 | M(50) | HYP; DM | 0.012 |
| 18 | M(38) | HYP;DM | 0 |
|
| 19 | M(38) | - | 0 | - | 19 | M(65) | HYP | 0 |
|
| 20 | M(66) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 20 | M(64) | DM | 0 |
|
| 21 | M(80) | - | 0 | - | 21 | M(70) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 22 | M(68) | - | 0 | - | 22 | M(66) | - | 0.321 | - |
| 23 | M(39) | - | 0.32 | - | 23 | F(57) | - | 0.351 | - |
| 24 | M(44) | Smoker | 0.021 | - | 24 | M(37) | - | 0.002 | - |
| 25 | F(60) | HYP | 0.025 |
| 25 | M(43) | HYP | 0.005 |
|
| 26 | M(55) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 26 | M(53) | - | 0.004 | - |
| 27 | M(50) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 27 | M(50) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 28 | M(49) | - | 0.251 | - | 28 | M(59) | Smoker | 0 | - |
| 29 | M(59) | HYP | 0 |
| 29 | M(60) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 30 | M(50) | HYP; DM | 0 |
| 30 | M(60) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 31 | M(60) | - | 0 | - | 31 | F(61) | - | 0.21 |
|
| 32 | M(51) | Smoker | 0 | - | 32 | M(64) | - | 0.123 | - |
| 33 | M(60) | DM; Smoker | 0.023 |
| 33 | F(51) | - | 0.004 | - |
| 34 | M(61) | Smoker | 0.021 | - | 34 | M(60) | HYP; Smoker | 0 | - |
| 35 | M(60) | HYP; Smoker | 0.002 |
| 35 | F(51) | - | 0 | - |
| 36 | F(51) | - | 0.015 | - | 36 | M(69) | Smoker | 0 | - |
| 37 | M(84) | Smoker | 0.254 | - | 37 | M(69) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 38 | M(69) | - | 0 | - | 38 | F(60) | - | 0.321 | - |
| 39 | M(74) | - | 0 | - | 39 | M(59) | HYP | 0.21 |
|
| 40 | M(70) | - | 0 | - | 40 | M(84) | - | 0 | - |
| 41 | M(51) | Smoker | 0.32 | - | 41 | M(61) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 42 | F(73) | HYP; DM | 0.25 |
| 42 | F(76) | - | 0 | - |
| 43 | M(51) | HYP | 0 |
| 43 | M(51) | HYP | 0.25 | - |
| 44 | M(57) | HYP | 0 |
| 44 | M(67) | HYP; Smoker | 0.321 |
|
| 45 | M(59) | - | 0.35 | - | 45 | M(38) | Smoker | 0 | - |
| 46 | F(49) | - | 0.002 | - | 46 | M(64) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 47 | F(61) | HYP | 0.002 |
| 47 | M(70) | HYP; DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 48 | M(70) | HYP; Smoker | 0.045 |
| 48 | M(62) | HYP; DM; Smoker | 0.354 |
|
| 49 | M(62) | Smoker | 0.022 | - | 49 | M(82) | HYP; DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 50 | M(52) | Smoker | 0.005 | - | 50 | M(39) | Smoker | 0 | - |
| 51 | M(39) | Smoker | 0 | - | 51 | M(73) | HYP; Smoker | 0.360 |
|
| 52 | M(63) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| 52 | F(68) | HYP; DM | 0.202 |
|
| 53 | F(68) | HYP | 0 |
| 53 | F(61) | DM | 0 |
|
| 54 | M(58) | - | 0 | - | 54 | M(58) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 55 | M(64) | - | 0.021 | - | 55 | M(74) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
|
| 56 | M(51) | HYP; DM; Smoker | 0 |
| |||||
| 57 | M(67) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
| |||||
| 58 | M(73) | DM; Smoker | 0 |
| |||||
| 59 | M(71) | - | 0 | - | |||||
| 60 | F(65) | HYP | 0 |
| |||||
| 61 | M(72) | HYP | 0 |
| |||||
| 62 | M(69) | - | 0.32 |
| |||||
| 63 | F(50) | HYP | 0.451 |
| |||||
| 64 | M(54) | Smoker | 0.214 | - | |||||
| 65 | M(82) | HYP; Smoker | 0 |
| |||||
| 66 | M(52) | DM; Smoker | 0 | - | |||||
| 67 | M(64) | Smoker | 0 |
| |||||
| 68 | M(49) | - | 0.254 | - | |||||
| 69 | M(65) | DM; Smoker | 0.125 | - | |||||
| 70 | M(73) | Smoker | 0 | - | |||||
The use of medications for the control of major atherosclerotic risk factors i.e., hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus was studied independently under the discretion of the care provider. These conditions were controlled by using various medications as indicated in the Table.
For those patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, oral hypoglycemic drugs such as sulfonylurea, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, thiazolidinediones, biguanides, were administered under the supervision of a medical practitioner as found appropriate
Anti-Hypertensive drugs such as hydroquinone, ACE-inhibitors, Alpha-Adrenoceptor Blockers; (Prazosin, Doxazosin, Terazosin,Phenoxybenzamine); Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers, Potassium Channel Opener; Ca+ion channel blockers were used in case of the patients who were suffering from hypertension. These patients were mostly suffering from essential hypertension for which neither any specific diagnosis nor any therapy is currently available.
The table represents the various AMI patients who participated in the study. Co-morbidities like hypertension, diabetes mellitus and smoking have been listed in the table. Plasma nitric oxide (NO) values have also been shown for each individual.
HYP = Hypertension; DM = Diabetes Mellitus; M = Male; F = Female; Numbers within parentheses represent the age of the respective persons.
Figure 2Nitric oxide levels in AMI patients in South Asia and in Southern Australia.
The NO level was determined by methemoglobin method as described in the Materials and Methods section in both the cases. Panel A represents the median values of plasma NO level in AMI patients and in the equal number of age and gender matched normal volunteers in Australia. Panel B shows the median values of plasma NO level in AMI patients and in the age and gender matched normal volunteers in India.
Figure 3The age group-plasma NO level adjusted regression model in both Indian and Australian AMI patients.
Regression model of the age related to the plasma NO level in both the Indian and Australian AMI patients was plotted. The age and the corresponding plasma NO level of the participants could be determined from the plot. Solid line represents the regression curve of the age group of the Indian AMI patients. Dotted line indicates the regression curve of the age group of the Australian AMI patients. Solid circles (•) indicate variations in the age group of Indian AMI patients. Solid squares (▪) indicate variations in the age group of the Australian AMI patients. The hollow circles (○) and the hollow squares (□) represent the plasma NO level in Indian and Australian patients respectively.
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier model of the survival rate of the animals with ADP induced coronary thrombosis in the presence and absence of the application of dermal SNP “pad”.
To determine the survival rate in the animals from coronary thrombosis by the dermal application of SNP “pad” induced by ADP, Kaplan-Meier survival curve was plotted. Group 1 represents the animals that received the dermal application of SNP “pad”. The curve indicates the survival period which shows survival of the animals up to 72 hours after the repeated injection of ADP. Group 2 represents the control group without SNP “pad” treatment. The survival time of the animals was less than an hour as shown by the curve.
Table-2. Cancer entities of the patients selected for the study.
| Types of cancer | Age (years) | Gender and number of patients who participated in the study |
| Lungs non-small cell carcinoma | 45–72 | Male (135); female (75) |
| Lungs small cell carcinoma | 30–65 | Male (75); female (70) |
| Breast cancer | 25–55 | Female (1050) |
| Esophagus | 35–50 | Male (450); female (159) |
| Stomach | 28–60 | Male (255); female (101) |
| Liver | 28–60 | Male (150); female (100) |
| Pancreas | 28–65 | Male (300); female (175) |
| Gall bladder | 30–65 | Male (110); female (150) |
| Colon | 35–71 | Male (175); female (92) |
| Rectum | 34–68 | Male (165); female (97) |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia | 4–70 | Male (105); female (150) |
| Acute myeloid leukemia | 5–75 | Male (55); female (45) |
| Multiple myeloma | 30–60 | Male (65); female (15) |
| Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | 24–58 | Male (65); female (110) |
| Hodgkin's Lymphoma | 17–52 | Male (85); female (100) |
| Uterus | 35–60 | Female (1020) |
| Cervix | 35–60 | Female (998) |
| Renal cell carcinoma | 35–70 | Male (65); female (80) |
| Ovary | 25–60 | Female (1091) |
| Prostate | 35–75 | Male (145) |
| Glioma | 30–72 | Male (115); female (90) |
The study involved the application of SNP “pad” for 3 years in patients suffering from different kinds of cancer. The digits within the parentheses denote the number of patients who volunteered to participate in the present study.
Death rates due to acute myocardial infarction in cancer patients with and without the use of SNP “patch” and in the normal counterparts.
| Patients | Death rate due to occurrence of AMI | Significance using Z-test analysis |
|
| 40% | z-value between |
|
| 12.265% | z-value between |
|
| 29.858% | z-value between |
Data cited in Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th Edition, Volume 2, Chapter 208, Approach to the Patient with Cardiovascular Disease by Eugene Braunwald pp 1301, McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division.
Data cited in Sinha AK, et al. Neutralization by “antineoplastin” of insulin-activated nitric oxide synthase antibody and its effects in cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec;128(12):659–68.
Data cited in Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th Edition, Volume 1, Chapter 66, Approach to the Patient with Cancer by Dan L. Longo pp-435. McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division and other journal articles reporting the statistical significance of the occurrence of AMI in cancer patients.
Sodium Nitroprusside “pad” was prepared and used dermally in patients with different kinds of cancers (n = 8,283) as described in the Materials and Methods in details.
Death rates due to AMI in the cancer patients who received SNP “pad” for 3 years was compared to the rate of death due to AMI in the normal population as reported in the literature.
The death rates between the groups were compared by using Z-test, a special case of null hypothesis.