Literature DB >> 24557616

Effect of end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy with circle discontinuous U suture in pancreatic surgery.

Xuewen Zhang1, Wei Xuan, Tao Jiang, Degang Ji, Yongsheng Yang, Dan Zhang, Yingjun Xie, Zihui Meng, Jisheng Zhao.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to summarize the methods of pancreaticojejunostomy in the pancreatic operation and to study the safety and feasibility of a new operative method called end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy with circle discontinuous U suture to prevent fistula of pancreaticojejunostomy. Eight-three patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy in the 3rd Hospital, Jilin University from 2001 January to 2006 April were reviewed. The incidences of pancreatic fistula with different types of pancreaticojejunostomy were compared. The overall incidence rate of pancreatic fistula was 26.5% (22/83). No pancreatic fistula occurred in end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy with circle discontinuous U suture. The incidence rate of the fistula following end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy with circle discontinuous U suture was significantly lower than that of traditional end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy [40%, (10/25), P<0.01] and end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy [27.3%, (12/44), P<0.05], but no significant difference (P>0.05) between traditional end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy was discovered. End-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy with circle discontinuous U suture has a definite effect on avoiding pancreatic fistula following pancreaticojejunostomy and is worth being recommended. But the cases were limited, so this method would still need to be observed and confirmed further in the future.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 24557616     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-007-0009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med China        ISSN: 1673-7342


  6 in total

1.  Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; M A Talamini; R H Hruban; S E Ord; P K Sauter; J Coleman; M L Zahurak; L B Grochow; R A Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  N Sato; K Yamaguchi; K Chijiiwa; M Tanaka
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-10

3.  A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  C J Yeo; J L Cameron; M M Maher; P K Sauter; M L Zahurak; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Preoperative chemoradiation, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and intraoperative radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  C A Staley; J E Lee; K R Cleary; J L Abbruzzese; C J Fenoglio; T A Rich; D B Evans
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Successful pancreatojejunal anastomosis for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Y Matsumoto; H Fujii; K Miura; S Inoue; T Sekikawa; H Aoyama; N Ohnishi; K Sakai; K Suda
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-12

6.  Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S G Marcus; H Cohen; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.