INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of using Automated External Defibrillator (AED) audiovisual feedback on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a manikin training setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cycles of 30 chest compressions were performed on a manikin without CPR prompts. After an interval of at least 5 minutes, the participants performed another 5 cycles with the use of real time audiovisual feedback via the ZOLL E-Series defibrillator. Performance data were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 209 dialysis centre staff participated in the study. Using a feedback system resulted in a statistically significant improvement from 39.57% to 46.94% (P=0.009) of the participants being within the target compression depth of 4 cm to 5 cm and a reduction in those below target from 16.45% to 11.05% (P=0.004). The use of feedback also produced a significant improvement in achieving the target for rate of chest compression (90 to 110 compressions per minute) from 41.27% to 53.49%; (P<0.001). The mean depth of chest compressions was 4.85 cm (SD=0.79) without audiovisual feedback and 4.91 (SD=0.69) with feedback. For rate of chest compressions, it was 104.89 (SD=13.74) vs 101.65 (SD=10.21) respectively. The mean depth of chest compression was less in males than in females (4.61 cm vs 4.93 cm, P=0.011), and this trend was reversed with the use of feedback. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of feedback devices helps to improve the quality of CPR during training. However more studies involving cardiac arrest patients requiring CPR need to be done to determine if these devices improve survival.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of using Automated External Defibrillator (AED) audiovisual feedback on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a manikin training setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cycles of 30 chest compressions were performed on a manikin without CPR prompts. After an interval of at least 5 minutes, the participants performed another 5 cycles with the use of real time audiovisual feedback via the ZOLL E-Series defibrillator. Performance data were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 209 dialysis centre staff participated in the study. Using a feedback system resulted in a statistically significant improvement from 39.57% to 46.94% (P=0.009) of the participants being within the target compression depth of 4 cm to 5 cm and a reduction in those below target from 16.45% to 11.05% (P=0.004). The use of feedback also produced a significant improvement in achieving the target for rate of chest compression (90 to 110 compressions per minute) from 41.27% to 53.49%; (P<0.001). The mean depth of chest compressions was 4.85 cm (SD=0.79) without audiovisual feedback and 4.91 (SD=0.69) with feedback. For rate of chest compressions, it was 104.89 (SD=13.74) vs 101.65 (SD=10.21) respectively. The mean depth of chest compression was less in males than in females (4.61 cm vs 4.93 cm, P=0.011), and this trend was reversed with the use of feedback. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of feedback devices helps to improve the quality of CPR during training. However more studies involving cardiac arrestpatients requiring CPR need to be done to determine if these devices improve survival.
Authors: Alexander E White; Han Xian Ng; Wai Yee Ng; Eileen Kai Xin Ng; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Phek Hui Jade Kua; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Jolanta Majer; Milosz J Jaguszewski; Michael Frass; Marcin Leskiewicz; Jacek Smereka; Jerzy R Ładny; Oliver Robak; Łukasz Szarpak Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Justin M Jeffers; Blake A Schreurs; James L Dean; Brandon Scott; Therese Canares; Sean Tackett; Brittany Smith; Emma Billings; Veena Billioux; Harshini D Sampathkumar; Keith Kleinman Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2022-07-09
Authors: Felix Lakomek; Roman-Patrik Lukas; Peter Brinkrolf; Andreas Mennewisch; Nicole Steinsiek; Peter Gutendorf; Hendrik Sudowe; Michael Heller; Robert Kwiecien; Alexander Zarbock; Andreas Bohn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240