Literature DB >> 30155865

Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study.

Jolanta Majer1, Milosz J Jaguszewski2, Michael Frass3, Marcin Leskiewicz4, Jacek Smereka4, Jerzy R Ładny5, Oliver Robak3, Łukasz Szarpak6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of chest compressions (CCs) carried out with and without the use of the TrueCPR device during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitations conducted by trainee doctors.
METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. The study involved 65 trainee doctors who were tasked with performing a 2-min cycle of uninterrupted CCs under conditions of a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults. CC were carried out in two scenarios: with and without TrueCPR chest compression support. Participants did not have experience in the use of CCs prior to this study.
RESULTS: The depth of compressions in regard to CC techniques were varied by 45 mm (IQR 43-48) for manual CC and 53 mm (IQR 51-55) for the TrueCPR device (p < 0.001). The incidence of CCs with and without TrueCPR was: 112 (IQR 103-113) vs. 129 (IQR 122-135) compressions (p = 0.002). The degree of complete chest relaxation with the TrueCPR device was 95% (IQR 76-99) and without the device, 33% (IQR 29-38) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the simulation study performed, the use of the TrueCPR device resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of CCs in relation to frequency and depth of CCs and correctness of chest relaxation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiopulmonary resuscitation; chest compressions; doctor; medical simulation; quality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30155865      PMCID: PMC8084395          DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  36 in total

1.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 9. First aid.

Authors:  David A Zideman; Emmy D J De Buck; Eunice M Singletary; Pascal Cassan; Athanasios F Chalkias; Thomas R Evans; Christina M Hafner; Anthony J Handley; Daniel Meyran; Susanne Schunder-Tatzber; Philippe G Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  CPREzy improves performance of external chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Stefan K Beckers; Max H Skorning; Michael Fries; Johannes Bickenbach; Stephan Beuerlein; Matthias Derwall; Ralf Kuhlen; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  A review of the utility of a hypothermia protocol in cardiac arrests due to non-shockable rhythms.

Authors:  Brin Freund; Peter W Kaplan
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  The impact of chest compression rates on quality of chest compressions - a manikin study.

Authors:  Richard A Field; Jasmeet Soar; Robin P Davies; Naheed Akhtar; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Comparison of the Pentax, Truview, GlideScope, and the Miller laryngoscope for child intubation during resuscitation.

Authors:  Łukasz Szarpak; Łukasz Czyżewski; Andrzej Kurowski
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  The impact of a CPRezy™ feedback device on the quality of chest compressions performed by nurses.

Authors:  Wojciech Wieczorek; Jacek Smereka; Jerzy R Ladny; Halla Kaminska; Robert Galazkowski; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation.

Authors:  Lukasz Iskrzycki; Jacek Smereka; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; Roberto Barcala Furelos; Cristian Abelarias Gomez; Halla Kaminska; Wojciech Wieczorek; Lukasz Szarpak; Klaudiusz Nadolny; Robert Galazkowski; Kurt Ruetzler; Jerzy Robert Ladny
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.108

8.  A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study.

Authors:  Lukasz Szarpak; Zenon Truszewski; Lukasz Czyzewski; Tomasz Gaszynski; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 9.  Audiovisual feedback device use by health care professionals during CPR: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials.

Authors:  Shelley Kirkbright; Judith Finn; Hideo Tohira; Alexandra Bremner; Ian Jacobs; Antonio Celenza
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Pre-discharge defibrillation testing: Is it still justified?

Authors:  Maciej Kempa; Tomasz Królak; Łukasz Drelich; Szymon Budrejko; Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz; Ewa Lewicka; Dariusz Kozłowski; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.737

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Is it as bad as we think?

Authors:  Mahdi Al-Jeabory; Kamil Safiejko; Szymon Bialka; Michal Pruc; Aleksandra Gasecka; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial.

Authors:  Marek Malysz; Marek Dabrowski; Bernd W Böttiger; Jacek Smereka; Klaudia Kulak; Agnieszka Szarpak; Milosz Jaguszewski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Jerzy R Ladny; Kurt Ruetzler; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial.

Authors:  Togay Evrin; Jacek Smereka; Damian Gorczyca; Szymon Bialka; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Burak Katipoglu; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 1.112

4.  Chest compressions quality during sudden cardiac arrest scenario performed in virtual reality: A crossover study in a training environment.

Authors:  Filip Jaskiewicz; Dawid Kowalewski; Katarzyna Starosta; Marcin Cierniak; Dariusz Timler
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Jianqiao Zheng; Li Du; Xiaoqian Deng; Lu Zhang; Jia Wang; Guo Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Adequacy of compression positioning using the feedback device during chest compressions by medical staff in a simulation study.

Authors:  Yasuaki Koyama; Tasuku Matsuyama; Takako Kaino; Tetsuya Hoshino; Junzo Nakao; Nobutake Shimojo; Yoshiaki Inoue
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Effect of a feedback system on the quality of 2-minute chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised crossover simulation study.

Authors:  Chunshuang Wu; Jingyu You; Shaoyun Liu; Lan Ying; Yuzhi Gao; Yulin Li; Xiao Lu; Anyu Qian; Mao Zhang; Guangju Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Can a Glove-Coach Technology Significantly Increase the Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Non-healthcare Professionals? A Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michele Musiari; Andrea Saporito; Samuele Ceruti; Maira Biggiogero; Martina Iattoni; Andrea Glotta; Laura Cantini; Xavier Capdevila; Tiziano Cassina
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.