Literature DB >> 24557029

Evaluation of radiation dose to anthropomorphic paediatric models from positron-emitting labelled tracers.

Tianwu Xie1, Habib Zaidi.   

Abstract

PET uses specific molecules labelled with positron-emitting radionuclides to provide valuable biochemical and physiological information. However, the administration of radiotracers to patients exposes them to low-dose ionizing radiation, which is a concern in the paediatric population since children are at a higher cancer risk from radiation exposure than adults. Therefore, radiation dosimety calculations for commonly used positron-emitting radiotracers in the paediatric population are highly desired. We evaluate the absorbed dose and effective dose for 19 positron-emitting labelled radiotracers in anthropomorphic paediatric models including the newborn, 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year-old male and female. This is achieved using pre-calculated S-values of positron-emitting radionuclides of UF-NCI paediatric phantoms and published biokinetic data for various radiotracers. The influence of the type of anthropomorphic model, tissue weight factors and direct human- versus mouse-derived biokinetic data on the effective dose for paediatric phantoms was also evaluated. In the case of (18)F-FDG, dosimetry calculations of reference paediatric patients from various dose regimens were also calculated. Among the considered radiotracers, (18)F-FBPA and (15)O-water resulted in the highest and lowest effective dose in the paediatric phantoms, respectively. The ICRP 103 updated tissue-weighting factors decrease the effective dose in most cases. Substantial differences of radiation dose were observed between direct human- versus mouse-derived biokinetic data. Moreover, the effect of using voxel- versus MIRD-type models on the calculation of the effective dose was also studied. The generated database of absorbed organ dose and effective dose for various positron-emitting labelled radiotracers using new generation computational models and the new ICRP tissue-weighting factors can be used for the assessment of radiation risks to paediatric patients in clinical practice. This work also contributes to a better understanding of the factors influencing patient-specific radiation dose calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557029     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/5/1165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

Review 1.  An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

Authors:  X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Development of computational pregnant female and fetus models and assessment of radiation dose from positron-emitting tracers.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Re-evaluation of pediatric 18F-FDG dosimetry: Cristy-Eckerman versus UF/NCI hybrid computational phantoms.

Authors:  Kitiwat Khamwan; Shannon E O'Reilly; Donika Plyku; Alison Goodkind; Anders Josefsson; Xinhua Cao; Frederic H Fahey; S Ted Treves; Wesley E Bolch; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Assessment of radiation dose in nuclear cardiovascular imaging using realistic computational models.

Authors:  Tianwu Xie; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Development of an age-scalable 3D computational phantom in DICOM standard for late effects studies of childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Aashish C Gupta; Suman Shrestha; Constance A Owens; Susan A Smith; Ying Qiao; Rita E Weathers; Peter A Balter; Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-09-29

6.  Evaluation of radiation dose to pediatric models from whole body PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Najmeh Mohammadi; Parisa Akhlaghi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.