Literature DB >> 24557004

Analyzing nasal septal deviations to develop a new classification system: a computed tomography study using MATLAB and OsiriX.

Jonathan K Lin, Francis C Wheatley, Jason Handwerker, Norman J Harris, Brian J F Wong.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Accurately characterizing nasal septal deviations is valuable for surgical planning, classifying nasal septal deviations, providing a means to accurately perform outcomes research, and understanding the causes of chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE To determine and quantify regions of septal deformity that can be used to develop a comprehensive classification system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective case series study was conducted at an academic tertiary care hospital. Sixty-four participants were selected based on a convenience sample of computed tomography (CT) scans of the paranasal sinuses and midface available between June 29, 2011, and August 16, 2012. Exclusion criteria consisted of incomplete or inadequate CT series. The most recent CT scans were chosen for analyses regardless of the indication for imaging. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format bitmap file–formatted data were obtained and analyzed using MATLAB and OsiriX. The line to curve ratio, deviation area, and root mean square (RMS) values of the septal contour vs the ideal straight septum fit were calculated. Analysis was performed to detect significant differences (P < .05) using the 3 measures.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Quantitative analysis of nasal septal deviation.RESULTS The population consisted of 50 male and 14 female patients aged 3 to 83 years(mean, 42 years). Mean line to curve ratios, areas, and RMS values were highest in contours that intersected the perpendicular plate–vomer junction, with a mean line to curve ratio of1.04 and mean deviated area of 627.16 arbitrary units (P = .02). Maximal deviation areas were also seen midway from the perpendicular plate–vomer junction to the nasal spine with a mean area of 577.31 arbitrary units (P = .01). The RMS values were significantly elevated along the crista galli and perpendicular plate–vomer junction (P < .05).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Maximum septal deviation is seen at the perpendicular plate–vomer junction and in the regions near the crista galli and anterior nasal spine.Deviation area and RMS values are important measures to characterize septal deviations.Understanding septal deviations can aid in developing a functional classification system of nasal septal deviations for clinical use and a means to better record and compare surgical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557004      PMCID: PMC4130224          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  8 in total

1.  The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Jack P Gunter; Mark A Deuber; William P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A morphometric consideration of nasal septal deviations by people with paranasal complaints; a computed tomography study.

Authors:  Ranko Mladina
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Classification of nasal septal deviations-Relation to sinonasal pathology.

Authors:  J Janardhan Rao; E C Vinay Kumar; K Ram Babu; V Sathavahana Chowdary; Jaswinder Singh; S Vineeta Rangamani
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

4.  A morphometric consideration of nasal septal deviations by people with paranasal complaints; a computed tomography study.

Authors:  M Buyukertan; N Keklikoglu; G Kokten
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Nasal septal deviation in the pediatric and adult populations.

Authors:  Shari D Reitzen; Wayne Chung; Anil R Shah
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.697

6.  A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery.

Authors:  B Guyuron; C D Uzzo; H Scull
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Deviated nose correction: different outcomes according to the deviation type.

Authors:  Gye Song Cho; Yong Ju Jang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  A new classification of septal deviations.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann; Helmut Baumann
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.681

  8 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Implications of Nasal Septal Deformities.

Authors:  Ranko Mladina; Neven Skitarelić; Gorazd Poje; Marin Šubarić
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  As the Nasal Spine Goes, So Goes the Septum.

Authors:  Devkumar Rengaraja; Mohan Jagade; Vitthal Kale; Anoop Attakil; Rajesh Kar; Arpita Singhal; Karthik Rao; Pallavi Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Validation of a septoplasty deformity grading system for the evaluation of nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Gu; Sherrie Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; Hollin Calloway; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Comparing dimensions of upper airway in patients with nasal septal deviation and healthy people in CBCT.

Authors:  Nasim Jafari-Pozve; Hamidreza Kiani; Seyed-Sasan Aryanezhad
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Prevalence of Nasal Septum Deviation Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Bahareh Abedian; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Farzam Tajdini
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  Nasal septum changes in adolescent patients treated with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Tehnia Aziz; Francis Carter Wheatley; Kal Ansari; Manuel Lagravere; Michael Major; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Nicole Rotter
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 8.  Nasal Septal Deviations: A Systematic Review of Classification Systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey Teixeira; Victor Certal; Edward T Chang; Macario Camacho
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2016-01-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.