Literature DB >> 24556539

Electromagnetically controllable osteoclast activity.

Jung Min Hong1, Kyung Shin Kang1, Hee-Gyeong Yi1, Shin-Yoon Kim2, Dong-Woo Cho3.   

Abstract

The time-varying electromagnetic field (EMF) has been widely studied as one of the exogenous stimulation methods for improving bone healing. Our previous study showed that osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells was accelerated by a 45-Hz EMF, whereas a 7.5-Hz EMF inhibited osteogenic marker expression. Accordingly, we hypothesized that each negative and positive condition for the osteogenic differentiation could inversely influence osteoclast formation and differentiation. Here, we demonstrated that osteoclast formation, differentiation, and activity can be regulated by altering the frequency of the electromagnetic stimulation, such as 7.5 (negative for osteogenic differentiation) and 45 Hz (positive for osteogenic differentiation). A 45 Hz EMF inhibited osteoclast formation whereas a 7.5-Hz EMF induced differentiation and activity. Osteoclastogenic markers, such as NFATc1, TRAP, CTSK, MMP9, and DC-STAMP were highly expressed under the 7.5-Hz EMF, while they were decreased at 45 Hz. We found that the 7.5-Hz EMF directly regulated osteoclast differentiation through ERK and p38 MAPK activation, whereas the EMF at 45 Hz suppressed RANKL-induced phosphorylation of IκB. Additionally, actin ring formation with tubules and bone resorptive activity were enhanced at 7.5 Hz through increased integrin β3 expression. However, these were inhibited at 45 Hz. Although many questions remain unanswered, our study indicates that osteoclast formation and differentiation were controllable using physical tools, such as an EMF. It will now be of great interest to study the ill-defined correlation between electromagnetic conditions and osteoclast activities, which eventually could lead to determining the therapeutic characteristics of an EMF that will treat bone-related diseases.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Electromagnetic field; Frequency; Osteoclast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556539     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Primary human osteoblasts with reduced alkaline phosphatase and matrix mineralization baseline capacity are responsive to extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic field exposure - Clinical implication possible.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Karsten Falldorf; Anne-Kristin Fentz; Patrick Ziegler; Steffen Schröter; Thomas Freude; Björn G Ochs; Christina Stacke; Michael Ronniger; Jens Sachtleben; Andreas K Nussler
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2015-08-18

Review 2.  Targeting Mesenchymal Stromal Cells/Pericytes (MSCs) With Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Has the Potential to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Christina L Ross; Dennis C Ang; Graça Almeida-Porada
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Capacitive technologies for highly controlled and personalized electrical stimulation by implantable biomedical systems.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; J Coutinho; Ana Marote; Bárbara Sousa; A Ramos; Jorge A F Ferreira; Rodrigo Bernardo; André Rodrigues; A Torres Marques; Odete A B da Cruz E Silva; Edward P Furlani; José A O Simões; Sandra I Vieira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Towards an effective sensing technology to monitor micro-scale interface loosening of bioelectronic implants.

Authors:  Marco P Soares Dos Santos; Rodrigo Bernardo; Luís Henriques; A Ramos; Jorge A F Ferreira; Edward P Furlani; A Torres Marques; José A O Simões
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of Magnetic Stimulation on Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.

Authors:  Valentina Peluso; Laura Rinaldi; Teresa Russo; Olimpia Oliviero; Anna Di Vito; Corrado Garbi; Amerigo Giudice; Roberto De Santis; Antonio Gloria; Vincenzo D'Antò
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Osteogenesis Modulation: Induction of Mandibular Bone Growth in Adults by Electrical Field for Aesthetic Purposes.

Authors:  Gregorio Hernandez Zendejas; Marek K Dobke; Andrew Phelps; Gabriel Planas; Marco Sanchez
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Pentoxifylline and electromagnetic field improved bone fracture healing in rats.

Authors:  Yusuf Atalay; Nedim Gunes; Mehmet Dervis Guner; Veysi Akpolat; Mustafa Salih Celik; Rezzan Guner
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Inhibitory Effects of KP-A159, a Thiazolopyridine Derivative, on Osteoclast Differentiation, Function, and Inflammatory Bone Loss via Suppression of RANKL-Induced MAP Kinase Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Hye Jung Ihn; Doohyun Lee; Taeho Lee; Sang-Hyun Kim; Hong-In Shin; Yong Chul Bae; Jung Min Hong; Eui Kyun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Co-Culture with Human Osteoblasts and Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields Improve Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sabrina Ehnert; Martijn van Griensven; Marina Unger; Hanna Scheffler; Karsten Falldorf; Anne-Kristin Fentz; Claudine Seeliger; Steffen Schröter; Andreas K Nussler; Elizabeth R Balmayor
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.