Literature DB >> 24556502

A comparison of individual and population-derived vascular input functions for quantitative DCE-MRI in rats.

David A Hormuth1, Jack T Skinner2, Mark D Does3, Thomas E Yankeelov4.   

Abstract

Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can quantitatively and qualitatively assess physiological characteristics of tissue. Quantitative DCE-MRI requires an estimate of the time rate of change of the concentration of the contrast agent in the blood plasma, the vascular input function (VIF). Measuring the VIF in small animals is notoriously difficult as it requires high temporal resolution images limiting the achievable number of slices, field-of-view, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise. Alternatively, a population-averaged VIF could be used to mitigate the acquisition demands in studies aimed to investigate, for example, tumor vascular characteristics. Thus, the overall goal of this manuscript is to determine how the kinetic parameters estimated by a population based VIF differ from those estimated by an individual VIF. Eight rats bearing gliomas were imaged before, during, and after an injection of Gd-DTPA. K(trans), ve, and vp were extracted from signal-time curves of tumor tissue using both individual and population-averaged VIFs. Extended model voxel estimates of K(trans) and ve in all animals had concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) ranging from 0.69 to 0.98 and Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) ranging from 0.70 to 0.99. Additionally, standard model estimates resulted in CCCs ranging from 0.81 to 0.99 and PCCs ranging from 0.98 to 1.00, supporting the use of a population based VIF if an individual VIF is not available.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DCE; Dynamic contrast; Input function; MRI; Pharmacokinetic modeling; Tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556502      PMCID: PMC3965603          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  26 in total

1.  Deuterium NMR tissue perfusion measurements using the tracer uptake approach: I. Optimization of methods.

Authors:  N E Simpson; Z He; J L Evelhoch
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Jeffrey J Luci; Martin Lepage; Rui Li; Laura Debusk; P Charles Lin; Ronald R Price; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Lijuan Zhang; Bensheng Qiu; Li Meng; Xiaoyi Wang; Bob L Hou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Free-breathing quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a rat liver tumor model using dynamic radial T(1) mapping.

Authors:  Rickmer Braren; Jelena Curcic; Stefanie Remmele; Jennifer Altomonte; Oliver Ebert; Ernst J Rummeny; Andreas Steingoetter
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Method for improving the accuracy of quantitative cerebral perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ken E Sakaie; Wanyong Shin; Kenneth R Curtin; Richard M McCarthy; Ty A Cashen; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Intratumoral histologic heterogeneity of gliomas. A quantitative study.

Authors:  W Paulus; J Peiffer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative SPECT in a rat glioma model.

Authors:  Jack T Skinner; Thomas E Yankeelov; Todd E Peterson; Mark D Does
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Heterogeneity in malignant gliomas: a magnetic resonance analysis of spatial distribution of metabolite changes and regional blood volume.

Authors:  Marlies Wagner; Reinhold Nafe; Alina Jurcoane; Ulrich Pilatus; Kea Franz; Johannes Rieger; Joachim P Steinbach; Elke Hattingen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.

Authors:  E Henderson; B K Rutt; T Y Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  7 in total

1.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Xinzeng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Validation of a T1 and T2* leakage correction method based on multiecho dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using MION as a reference standard.

Authors:  Ashley M Stokes; Natenael Semmineh; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the patellar bone: How to quantify perfusion.

Authors:  Dirk H J Poot; Rianne A van der Heijden; Marienke van Middelkoop; Edwin H G Oei; Stefan Klein
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Phantom Validation of DCE-MRI Magnitude and Phase-Based Vascular Input Function Measurements.

Authors:  Warren Foltz; Brandon Driscoll; Sangjune Laurence Lee; Krishna Nayak; Naren Nallapareddy; Ali Fatemi; Cynthia Ménard; Catherine Coolens; Caroline Chung
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

5.  HACE1-mediated NRF2 activation causes enhanced malignant phenotypes and decreased radiosensitivity of glioma cells.

Authors:  Chenxing Da; Jun Pu; Zhe Liu; Jing Wei; Yiping Qu; Yongxing Wu; Bingyin Shi; Jian Yang; Nongyue He; Peng Hou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-11-24

6.  A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter Calculations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Forecasting tumor and vasculature response dynamics to radiation therapy via image based mathematical modeling.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.