Literature DB >> 24555591

Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: impact of body mass index.

Alban Gervaise1, Pierre Naulet, Florence Beuret, Christelle Henry, Matthieu Pernin, Yann Portron, Marie Lapierre-Combes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on dose, diagnostic performance, and image quality of a low-dose CT examination for renal colic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent a low-dose CT examination for renal colic performed during the year 2012 with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a low tube voltage (kV). Three readers independently reviewed all images for the presence of renal colic and evaluated diagnostic confidence and image quality. The results and doses were compared among patients grouped by body mass index (BMI) and between patients with a BMI<25 and those with a BMI≥25.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included in the study: 39 patients had a BMI<25 and 47 had a BMI≥25. No statistically significant difference was found between the accuracy rates for the diagnosis of renal colic when the rates of the three independent readers were averaged for both BMI groups (95.7% vs 96.4%, respectively; p=0.83). Image quality and diagnostic confidence scores were significantly better for patients with a BMI≥25 than for patients with a BMI<25 (mean image quality score, 3.7 vs 3.4, p<0.001; mean diagnostic confidence score, 2.8 vs 2.5, p<0.001). The mean radiation dose for patients with a BMI<25 was 2.4 mGy compared with 3.7 mGy for patients with a BMI≥25 (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of our low-dose CT protocol for renal colic was excellent for all patients, and image quality and diagnostic confidence were significantly better for patients with a BMI≥25. However, our protocol also required exposure to a greater dose of radiation for these overweight and obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24555591     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Diagnostic usefulness  of low-dose lumbar multi-detector CT with iterative reconstruction in trauma patients: acomparison with standard-dose CT.

Authors:  Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun; Dong Hyeon Kim; Hyeon Hwan Jo; Jae Gwang Song; Yong Sung Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Can virtual monochromatic images from dual-energy CT replace low-kVp images for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT in small- and medium-sized patients?

Authors:  Peijie Lv; Zhigang Zhou; Jie Liu; Yaru Chai; Huiping Zhao; Hua Guo; Daniele Marin; Jianbo Gao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Optimizing z-axis coverage of abdominal CT scans of the urinary tract: a proposed alternative proximal landmark for acquisition planning.

Authors:  Alban Gervaise; Pedro Teixeira; Gabriela Hossu; Alain Blum; Marie Lapierre-Combes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Increased urinary bladder volume improves the detectability of urinary stones at the ureterovesical junction in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT).

Authors:  Maxim Avanesov; Julja Togmat; Mehtap Solmaz; Michael Gerhard Kaul; Azien Laqmani; Helena Guerreiro; Sarah Keller; Lars Weisbach; Gerhard Adam; Jin Yamamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Intra-patient comparison of reduced-dose model-based iterative reconstruction with standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in the CT diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Sean Tenant; Chun Lap Pang; Prageeth Dissanayake; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Colin Stuckey; Catherine Gutteridge; Christopher Hyde; Carl Roobottom
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography for ureteral stones in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Brock Daniels; Monica Ghita; Gowthaman Gunabushanam; Seth Luty; Annette M Molinaro; Dinesh Singh; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.

Authors:  Jason Y Lee; Sero Andonian; Naeem Bhojani; Jennifer Bjazevic; Ben H Chew; Shubha De; Hazem Elmansy; Andrea G Lantz-Powers; Kenneth T Pace; Trevor D Schuler; Rajiv K Singal; Peter Wang; Michael Ordon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Application of deep learning reconstruction of ultra-low-dose abdominal CT in the diagnosis of renal calculi.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Zhang; Gumuyang Zhang; Lili Xu; Xin Bai; Jiahui Zhang; Min Xu; Jing Yan; Daming Zhang; Zhengyu Jin; Hao Sun
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-10-08

Review 10.  An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.