BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factors underlying differential responsiveness to opioid analgesic medications used in chronic pain management are poorly understood. We tested whether individual differences in endogenous opioid inhibition of chronic low-back pain were associated with the magnitude of acute reductions in back pain ratings after morphine administration. METHODS: In randomized counterbalanced order over three sessions, 50 chronic low-back pain patients received intravenous naloxone (8 mg), morphine (0.08 mg/kg), or placebo. Back pain intensity was rated predrug and again after peak drug activity was achieved using the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (Sensory and Affective subscales, VAS Intensity measure). Opioid blockade effect measures to index degree of endogenous opioid inhibition of back pain intensity were derived as the difference between predrug to postdrug changes in pain intensity across placebo and naloxone conditions, with similar morphine responsiveness measures derived across placebo and morphine conditions. RESULTS:Morphine significantly reduced back pain compared with placebo (McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form Sensory, VAS; P < 0.01). There were no overall effects of opioid blockade on back pain intensity. However, individual differences in opioid blockade effects were significantly associated with the degree of acute morphine-related reductions in back pain on all measures, even after controlling for effects of age, sex, and chronic pain duration (P < 0.03). Individuals exhibiting greater endogenous opioid inhibition of chronic back pain intensity reported less acute relief of back pain with morphine. CONCLUSIONS:Morphine appears to provide better acute relief of chronic back pain in individuals with lower natural opioidergic inhibition of chronic pain intensity. Possible implications for personalized medicine are discussed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factors underlying differential responsiveness to opioid analgesic medications used in chronic pain management are poorly understood. We tested whether individual differences in endogenous opioid inhibition of chronic low-back pain were associated with the magnitude of acute reductions in back pain ratings after morphine administration. METHODS: In randomized counterbalanced order over three sessions, 50 chronic low-back painpatients received intravenous naloxone (8 mg), morphine (0.08 mg/kg), or placebo. Back pain intensity was rated predrug and again after peak drug activity was achieved using the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (Sensory and Affective subscales, VAS Intensity measure). Opioid blockade effect measures to index degree of endogenous opioid inhibition of back pain intensity were derived as the difference between predrug to postdrug changes in pain intensity across placebo and naloxone conditions, with similar morphine responsiveness measures derived across placebo and morphine conditions. RESULTS:Morphine significantly reduced back pain compared with placebo (McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form Sensory, VAS; P < 0.01). There were no overall effects of opioid blockade on back pain intensity. However, individual differences in opioid blockade effects were significantly associated with the degree of acute morphine-related reductions in back pain on all measures, even after controlling for effects of age, sex, and chronic pain duration (P < 0.03). Individuals exhibiting greater endogenous opioid inhibition of chronic back pain intensity reported less acute relief of back pain with morphine. CONCLUSIONS:Morphine appears to provide better acute relief of chronic back pain in individuals with lower natural opioidergic inhibition of chronic pain intensity. Possible implications for personalized medicine are discussed.
Authors: G Corder; S Doolen; R R Donahue; M K Winter; B L Jutras; Y He; X Hu; J S Wieskopf; J S Mogil; D R Storm; Z J Wang; K E McCarson; B K Taylor Journal: Science Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Roger B Fillingim; Timothy J Ness; Toni L Glover; Claudia M Campbell; Barbara A Hastie; Donald D Price; Roland Staud Journal: J Pain Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Steven D Passik; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Erik Schuster; Daria Orlowska; Christopher R France Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: John W Burns; Stephen Bruehl; Christopher R France; Erik Schuster; Daria Orlowska; Melissa Chont; Rajnish K Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran Journal: J Pain Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Daria Orlowska; Erik Schuster; Christopher R France Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: John W Burns; Stephen Bruehl; Christopher R France; Erik Schuster; Daria Orlowska; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Rajnish K Gupta Journal: Pain Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 7.926