Literature DB >> 1195133

Disposition of naloxone: use of a new radioimmunoassay.

B A Berkowitz, S H Ngai, J Hempstead, S Spector.   

Abstract

Understanding of the pharmacology of the narcotic antagonist naloxone has been limited by the lack of a convenient and sensitive method of assay. A radioimmunoassay for naloxone has been developed and is described. It is applicable for drug analysis in either serum or brain. The limit of sensitivity of the assay was 0.1 ng. Naloxone glucuronide, noroxymorphone (nor-naloxone) and morphine were not recognized by the antibody whereas naltrexone and 6-hydroxynaloxone were able to displace naloxone-3H from the antibody. The assay was of sufficient sensitivity to follow the serum levels of naloxone in man for up to 2 hours after an i.v. injection of 0.4 mg. In animal studies, the biologic half-lives of naloxone or morphine (5 mg/kg) were compared after s.c. injection in rats. The peak serum levels A (1 mu/mo), time to peak serum levels (less than 1/2 hour), and serum half-life (40 minutes) were comparable. However, the brain entry and egress of the two compounds differed markedly. Peak brain levels of naloxone occurred within 15 minutes and had declined by 50% within 1 hour, whereas the peak brain levels of morphine were sustained for up to 2 hours. At peak serum levels, the brain/serum ratio for morphine was 0.1 whereas for naloxone it was 15 times greater. We suggest the high brain/serum ratio of naloxone contributes to its potency whereas the rapid egress from the brain is important in the short duration of action of naloxone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1195133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  27 in total

1.  Episodic withdrawal promotes psychomotor sensitization to morphine.

Authors:  Patrick E Rothwell; Jonathan C Gewirtz; Mark J Thomas
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Relationship between endogenous opioid function and opioid analgesic adverse effects.

Authors:  Rajnish K Gupta; Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Erik Schuster; Christopher R France
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  Naloxone dosage for opioid reversal: current evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rachael Rzasa Lynn; J L Galinkin
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-13

4.  The effects of repeated opioid administration on locomotor activity: I. Opposing actions of mu and kappa receptors.

Authors:  Mark A Smith; Jennifer L Greene-Naples; Megan A Lyle; Jordan C Iordanou; Jennifer N Felder
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Carotid baroreflex sensitivity at rest and during exercise is not influenced by opioid receptor antagonism.

Authors:  J Staessen; R Fiocchi; R Fagard; P Hespel; A Amery
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

6.  Naloxone does not affect cigarette smoking.

Authors:  R Nemeth-Coslett; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics in intravenous anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  P Duvaldestin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The Contribution of Differential Opioid Responsiveness to Identification of Opioid Risk in Chronic Pain Patients.

Authors:  Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Steven D Passik; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Erik Schuster; Daria Orlowska; Christopher R France
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Opioids and sexual behavior in the male rabbit: the role of central and peripheral opioid receptors.

Authors:  A Agmo; R G Paredes; J L Contreras
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1994

10.  Endogenous opioid inhibition of chronic low-back pain influences degree of back pain relief after morphine administration.

Authors:  Stephen Bruehl; John W Burns; Rajnish Gupta; Asokumar Buvanendran; Melissa Chont; Erik Schuster; Christopher R France
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.