| Literature DB >> 24553293 |
Jingjing Liu1, Huimin Liu2, Tingting Zhang3, Xiyun Ren3, Christina Nadolny4, Xiaoqun Dong4, Lina Huang3, Kexin Yuan3, Wenjing Tian3, Yunhe Jia5.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is strongly associated with gastric cancer. However, only a minority of infected individuals ever develop gastric cancer. This risk stratification may be in part due to differences among strains. The relationship between neutrophil-activating protein (NapA) and gastric cancer is unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the significance of NapA as a biomarker in gastric cancer. We used enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine the status of H. pylori infection. Indirect ELISA method was used for detection of NapA antibody titer in the serum of H. pylori infected individuals. Unconditional logistic regressions were adopted to analyze the variables and determine the association of NapA and gastric cancer. The results of study indicated serum H. pylori NapA antibody level were associated with a reduced risk for development of gastric cancer. It may be used in conjugation with other indicators for gastric cancer detection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24553293 PMCID: PMC3929916 DOI: 10.1038/srep04143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic characteristics and H. pylori detection results of subjects
| Case (n = 232) | Control (n = 268) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | No. | % | No. | % | |
| Age (years, Mean ± SD) | 59.56 ± 10.59 | 57.74 ± 10.57 | 0.055 | ||
| Sex | 0.055 | ||||
| Female | 58 | 25.00 | 88 | 32.84 | |
| Male | 174 | 75.00 | 180 | 67.16 | |
| 0.025 | |||||
| Positive | 132 | 59.73 | 120 | 48.00 | |
| Negative | 89 | 40.27 | 130 | 52.00 | |
| Equivocal | 11 | - | 18 | - | |
*P value was obtained from χ2 test.
aEquivocal values were not calculated in our study.
NapA antibodies levels and clinicopathological factors of the H. pylori-infected individuals
| Case (n = 132) | Control (n = 120) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | No. | % | No. | % |
| NapA antibodies levels | ||||
| Range | 0.03–0.65 | 0.05–0.32 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.05 | ||
| Median | 0.11 | 0.12 | ||
| Smoking status | ||||
| Ever/current | 81 | 61.36 | 54 | 45.00 |
| Never | 37 | 28.03 | 63 | 52.50 |
| Unknown | 14 | 10.61 | 3 | 2.50 |
| Alcohol consumption | ||||
| Ever/current | 71 | 53.79 | 42 | 35.00 |
| Never | 48 | 36.36 | 75 | 62.50 |
| Unknown | 13 | 9.85 | 3 | 2.50 |
| Family history of gastric cancer | ||||
| Yes | 10 | 7.58 | ||
| No | 106 | 80.30 | ||
| Unknown | 16 | 12.12 | ||
| Tumor location | ||||
| No-cardia | 223 | 96.1 | ||
| Cardia | 9 | 3.9 | ||
| Clinical stage | ||||
| I | 14 | 7.22 | ||
| II | 16 | 8.25 | ||
| III | 143 | 73.71 | ||
| IV | 21 | 10.82 | ||
| Tumor size | ||||
| T1 | 17 | 9.24 | ||
| T2 | 12 | 6.52 | ||
| T3 | 15 | 8.15 | ||
| T4 | 140 | 76.09 | ||
| Lymph node status | ||||
| N0 | 68 | 37.78 | ||
| N1 | 28 | 15.56 | ||
| N2 | 29 | 16.11 | ||
| N3 | 55 | 30.55 | ||
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| M0 | 179 | 89.50 | ||
| M1 | 21 | 10.50 | ||
aInformation was not available.
Univariate and Multivariate models to detect potential risk factors for gastric cancer in subjects infected by H. pylori
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factors | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Age (<60 vs. ≥60) | 1.58 | 0.94–2.64 | 0.08 | 1.70 | 0.95–3.02 | 0.07 |
| Sex (male vs. female) | 1.34 | 0.77–2.32 | 0.30 | 0.56 | 0.26–1.20 | 0.14 |
| Smoking status (yes vs. no) | 2.55 | 1.50–4.35 | <0.01 | 2.47 | 1.27–4.80 | <0.01 |
| Alcohol consumption (yes vs. no) | 2.64 | 1.56–4.47 | <0.01 | 2.42 | 1.24–4.72 | <0.01 |
| NapA status (positive vs. negative) | 8.14 | 1.83–36.19 | <0.01 | 9.21 | 1.96–43.14 | <0.01 |
*P value was obtained from unconditional logistic regression.
Validity and positive predictive values for different NapA critical values in subjects classified as H. pylori-positive
| Percentile | NapA critical value (OD) | Sensitivity (%) case test+/(case test+ + case test−) | Specificity (%) control test−/(control test+ + control test−) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal cut-off point | 0.146 | 86.36 | 35.00 |
| 90% | 0.201 | 97.73 | 10.00 |
| 75% | 0.159 | 89.39 | 24.17 |
| 50% | 0.121 | 62.88 | 49.17 |
| 25% | 0.100 | 41.67 | 74.17 |
| 10% | 0.077 | 24.24 | 89.17 |
| 5% | 0.065 | 15.15 | 95.00 |
1Percentiles of serum NapA antibody levels in controls.
2Identification of the optimal cut-off point in the different parameters was performed according to the maximum Youden's index (sensitivity + specificity − 1).