Literature DB >> 24552303

Development and external validation of a prognostic tool for prediction of cancer-specific mortality after complete loco-regional pathological staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Maxine Sun1, Rosa S Djajadiningrat2, Hussain M Alnajjar3, Quoc-Dien Trinh1, Niels M Graafland2, Nick Watkin3, Pierre I Karakiewicz1, Simon Horenblas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel postoperative prognostic tool, which attempts to integrate both pathological tumour stage and histopathological factors, for prediction of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with SCCP treated with inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) or sentinel LN biopsy at a single institution were used for nomogram development and internal validation (n = 434), while a second cohort was used for external validation (n = 338). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards were used to examine the prognostic ability of patient age, a modified tumour staging that distinguishes between spongiosum and cavernosum body ingrowth tumours, a modified LN staging that integrates information on presence/absence of LN metastasis, extent of inguinal LN metastases, pelvic LN involvement, and extranodal involvement, and tumour grade. Model performance was quantified using measures of discrimination and calibration.
RESULTS: Overall, 36% of patients had positive LN metastases (n = 156). In univariable analyses, the modified tumour and LN staging systems were statistically significantly associated with CSM, and remained in the final model with a discrimination of 89% within internal validation, and 95% within external validation. Calibration was nearly perfect.
CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed model integrates important prognostic factors, which existing models do not consider. Its performance was highly accurate using measures of discrimination and calibration.
© 2014 The Authors BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  <squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; cancer-specific mortality; nomogram; prognostics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24552303     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

Review 1.  What you need to know: updates in penile cancer staging.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Khalil; Mohamed H Kamel; Jasreman Dhillon; Viraj Master; Rodney Davis; Ali J Hajiran; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The importance of extranodal extension in penile cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Ling Zhang; Chun-Ping Yu; Zhuo-Wei Liu; Liliya Velet; Yong-Hong Li; Li-Juan Jiang; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The Development and Validation of a Nomogram Incorporating Clinical, Pathological, and Therapeutic Features to Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Penile Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Ruidan Li; Ke Cheng; Zhigong Wei; Zheran Liu; Xingchen Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Nomogram prediction of overall survival based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenwen Zheng; Kangqi Li; Weiwei Zhu; Yuexia Ding; Qingna Wu; Qiling Tang; Congxiao Lu; Quan Zhao; Shengqiang Yu; Chenyu Guo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Prognostic Values of Different Clinicopathological Factors and Predictive Models for Penile Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanxiang Shao; Thongher Lia; Yaohui Wang; Kan Wu; Xu Hu; Yang Liu; Shuyang Feng; Shangqing Ren; Zhen Yang; Sanchao Xiong; Weixiao Yang; Qiang Wei; Hao Zeng; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.