| Literature DB >> 24551495 |
Kuheli Das1, Amitabha Datta2, Chittaranjan Sinha1, Jui-Hsien Huang2, Eugenio Garribba3, Ching-Sheng Hsiao2, Chin-Lin Hsu4.
Abstract
The reactions of the tridentate hydrazone ligand,Entities:
Keywords: copper(II) complexes; electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy; hydrazone ligands; variable-temperature magnetic studies
Year: 2012 PMID: 24551495 PMCID: PMC3922458 DOI: 10.1002/open.201100011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Scheme 1Condensation of acetic hydrazide with 2-acetylpyridine. A subsequent deprotonation leads to the formation of L−.[17]
Crystallographic data for complexes 1 and 2
| Complex | Complex | |
|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C10H10CuN4OS | C18H20Cl2Cu2N6O2 |
| Formula weight | 297.84 | 550.38 |
| 298(2) | 150(2) | |
| Wavelength [Å] | 0.71073 | 0.71073 |
| Crystal system | monoclinic | monoclinic |
| Space group | ||
| Unit cell dimensions [Å] | ||
| Angle ( | 98.516(4) | 109.763(11) |
| Volume [Å3] | 1181.63(16) | 2060.1(7) |
| 4 | 4 | |
| Calcd density [mg m−3] | 1.674 | 1.775 |
| Absorption coefficient [mm−1] | 2.012 | 2.353 |
| 604 | 1112 | |
| Crystal size [mm3] | 0.40×0.21×0.15 | 0.18×0.16×0.14 |
| θ range for data collection [°] | 2.13–28.78 | 2.53–28.73 |
| Reflections collected | 17 434 | 7940 |
| Independent reflections | 3056 [ | 2426 [ |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 3056/0/147 | 2426/0/138 |
| Goodness-of-fit on | 1.031 | 1.069 |
| Final | ||
| Largest diff. peak/hole [e Å−3] | 0.533/−0.421 | 0.777/−1.188 |
Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for complexes 1 and 2
| Complex | Complex | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu1–O1 | 1.960(1) | Cu1–Cl1 | 2.746(1) |
| Cu1–N1 | 2.021(1) | Cu1–N2 | 1.923(2) |
| Cu1–N2 | 1.920(1) | Cu1–O1 | 1.963(2) |
| Cu1–N4 | 1.916(1) | Cu1–N3 | 2.023(2) |
| N2–N3 | 1.377(2) | Cu1–Cl1a | 2.241(1) |
| Cu1–S1b | 2.745(1) | N1–N2 | 1.382(3) |
| Shortest Cu⋅⋅⋅Cu | 6.116(1) | Cu1⋅⋅⋅Cu1a | 3.402(1) |
| N1–Cu1–N2 | 80.36(5) | N3–Cu1–N2 | 80.20(7) |
| N2–Cu1–O1 | 79.92(5) | O1–Cu1–Cl1a | 99.49(5) |
| O1–Cu1–N4 | 98.56(5) | N3–Cu1–Cl1a | 99.04(5) |
| N4–Cu1–N1 | 99.21(5) | N2–Cu1–O1 | 79.88(7) |
| O1–Cu1–N3 | 159.35(8) | ||
| N2–Cu1–Cl1a | 169.10(6) | ||
Symmetry operation: b= −x, +y, −z.
Symmetry operation: a= −x, −y, −z.
Figure 1Representation of the molecular structure of [CuL(NCS)] (1).
Figure 2a) Crystallographic packing of complex 1 showing the S coordination of a thiocyanate at the axial position of a square-pyramidal copper(II) ion (Cu1–S1b=2.745(1) Å), generating a one-dimensional coordination polymer; b) the NCS bridging of molecules of 1 produces a one-dimensional helical chain that grows along the crystallographic b axis. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity and the coordination compound is shown in green. Symmetry operation: b= −x, +y, −z.
Figure 3Representation of the molecular structure of compound 2. Symmetry operation: a= −x, −y, −z.
Figure 4Different perspectives of the crystal packing of compound 2 showing the formation a staircase-like supramolecular chain generated by means of N(lone pair)–π interactions. The Cg4⋅⋅⋅N2 contact distance amounts to 3.421(2) Å.
Figure 5X-band EPR spectrum of a polycrystalline sample of complex 1 at RT: a) experimental and b) simulated spectrum.
Figure 6A plot of χM T versus T for complexes 1 (•) and 2 (○), where χ is the molar magnetic susceptibility. Only data below 200 K are shown. Lines represent the best fits to the adequate model (see text).
Figure 7Anisotropic X-band EPR spectra recorded at 100 K of polycrystalline samples of 1 dissolved in a) DMSO and b) DMF.
Figure 8X-band EPR spectra of polycrystalline samples of 2 dissolved in dichloromethane/toluene (50:50 v/v) at a) RT and b) 100 K.
Figure 9Anisotropic X-band EPR spectra recorded at 100 K of polycrystalline samples of 2 dissolved in a) DMSO, b) DMSO/DMF (50:50 v/v) and c) DMF. The small graduated line indicates the position of the absorptions due to the super-hyperfine coupling with 14N nuclei and the asterisks (*) indicate the parallel resonances of the minor species [CuLCl].
Figure 10Effects of complexes 1 and 2 on the cell viability of human colorectal carcinoma cells a) COLO-205 and b) HT-29. Cells were treated with 0–50 μm solutions of complexes 1 and 2 for 24 (▪) and 48 h (□). The reported values are the mean ±SD (n=3). p <0.05 (*) indicates value is significantly different from that of the control.