Literature DB >> 24551328

Understanding adoption of a personal health record in rural health care clinics: revealing barriers and facilitators of adoption including attributions about potential patient portal users and self-reported characteristics of early adopting users.

Jorie M Butler1, Marjorie Carter2, Candace Hayden3, Bryan Gibson4, Charlene Weir4, Laverne Snow5, Jose Morales3, Anne Smith6, Kim Bateman6, Adi V Gundlapalli2, Matthew Samore2.   

Abstract

Personal health records (PHRs) are important for improving patient care. An important prerequisite to realize benefits of PHR use is patient recruitment. To understand clinic barriers to adoption, we used Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory to frame an examination of clinic staff perceptions of a new PHR and perceptions of likely patient portal users. Clinic staff reported many relative advantages and observable benefits of the PHR but also some distinct problems. Attributions about potential patient users included demographic, computer use, and personality characteristics staff expected in likely users. Analysis of patient survey data of early adopters compared to non-users revealed discrepancies between clinic staff expectations and early adopters' self-reports. Implications for improving adoption of PHRs include ensuring compatibility with existing systems and avoiding recruitment biases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24551328      PMCID: PMC3900162     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Personal health record use by patients as perceived by ambulatory care physicians in Nebraska and South Dakota: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kevin T Fuji; Kimberly A Galt; Alexandra B Serocca
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2008-09-29

Review 3.  Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research.

Authors:  E G Eakin; R E Glasgow; K M Riley
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Users' Attitudes Towards Personal Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Authors:  Peyman Azad Khaneghah; Antonio Miguel-Cruz; Pamela Bentley; Lili Liu; Eleni Stroulia; Martin Ferguson-Pell
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Natalie C Benda; Drew Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Technology Access, Technical Assistance, and Disparities in Inpatient Portal Use.

Authors:  Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Jessica S Ancker; Beatriz Ryan; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Min Qian; Irma Alarcon; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Disparities in Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Use in Nephrology Clinics.

Authors:  Manisha Jhamb; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Aihua Bian; Guanhua Chen; T Alp Ikizler; Mark L Unruh; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD.

Authors:  Sarah J Schrauben; Lawrence Appel; Eleanor Rivera; Claudia M Lora; James P Lash; Jing Chen; L Lee Hamm; Jeffrey C Fink; Alan S Go; Raymond R Townsend; Rajat Deo; Laura M Dember; Harold I Feldman; Clarissa J Diamantidis
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 11.072

Review 6.  Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Taya Irizarry; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Christine R Curran
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Barriers to the use of personal health records by patients: a structured review.

Authors:  Chris Showell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Is Blockchain Technology Suitable for Managing Personal Health Records? Mixed-Methods Study to Test Feasibility.

Authors:  Yu Rang Park; Eunsol Lee; Wonjun Na; Sungjun Park; Yura Lee; Jae-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Preferred Functions of Personal Health Records in Rural Primary Health Clinics in Canada: Health Care Team Perspectives.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Kathy L Rush; Lindsay Burton; Mona Mattei; Selena Davis; Heidi Scott; Mindy A Smith; Leanne M Currie
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Sociodemographic Differences and Factors Affecting Patient Portal Utilization.

Authors:  Martina A Clarke; Elizabeth R Lyden; Jihyun Ma; Keyonna M King; Mohammad Mo Siahpush; Tzeyu Michaud; Regina E Idoate; Athena K Ramos
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.