Literature DB >> 33309860

Mobile Health (mHealth) Technology: Assessment of Availability, Acceptability, and Use in CKD.

Sarah J Schrauben1, Lawrence Appel2, Eleanor Rivera3, Claudia M Lora4, James P Lash4, Jing Chen5, L Lee Hamm5, Jeffrey C Fink6, Alan S Go7, Raymond R Townsend8, Rajat Deo8, Laura M Dember9, Harold I Feldman9, Clarissa J Diamantidis10.   

Abstract

RATIONALE &
OBJECTIVE: Digital and mobile health (mHealth) technologies improve patient-provider communication and increase information accessibility. We assessed the use of technology, attitudes toward using mHealth technologies, and proficiency in using mHealth technologies among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with open text responses. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study participants who completed current use and interest in using mHealth technologies questionnaires and the eHealth literacy Survey (eHEALS). EXPOSURE: Participant characteristics. OUTCOMES: Use of technology (ie, internet, email, smartphone, and mHealth applications [apps]), interest in future mHealth use, and proficiency in using digital and mHealth technologies, or eHealth literacy, determined by eHEALS score. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Poisson regression and a qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses.
RESULTS: Study participants (n = 932) had a mean age of 68 years old and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 54 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 59% were male. Approximately 70% reported current use of internet, email, and smartphones, and 35% used mHealth apps; only 27% had adequate eHealth literacy (eHEALS score ≥ 32). Participants <65 years of age (vs. ≥65), with more education, higher income, better cognition, and adequate health literacy reported more use of technology, and greater interest in using technologies. Participants of White (vs. non-White) race reported more use of internet and email but less interest in future use of mHealth. Younger age, higher annual income, and greater disease self-efficacy were associated with adequate eHealth literacy. Three themes regarding interest in using digital and mHealth technologies emerged: willingness, concerns, and barriers. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding, ascertainment bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals with CKD currently use the internet and smartphones and are interested in using mHealth in the future, but few use mHealth apps or have adequate eHealth literacy. mHealth technologies present an opportunity to engage individuals with CKD, especially members of racial or ethnic minority groups because those groups reported greater interest in using mHealth technology than the nonminority population. Further research is needed to identify strategies to overcome inadequate eHealth literacy.
Copyright © 2020 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic disease management; chronic kidney disease (CKD); digital divide; digital readiness; eHealth literacy; mHealth; mobile health; patient attitudes; survey; technological proficiency; technology use

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33309860      PMCID: PMC8154635          DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   11.072


  34 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Patients' and Nephrologists' Evaluation of Patient-Facing Smartphone Apps for CKD.

Authors:  Karandeep Singh; Clarissa J Diamantidis; Shreyas Ramani; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Peter Mara; Julia Warner; Jorge Rodriguez; Tianshi Wang; Julie Wright-Nunes
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record.

Authors:  Cyrus K Yamin; Srinivas Emani; Deborah H Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-28

Review 4.  Socioeconomic disparities in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Priya Vart; Ron T Gansevoort; Michel M Joosten; Ute Bültmann; Sijmen A Reijneveld
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Estimating GFR among participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study.

Authors:  Amanda Hyre Anderson; Wei Yang; Chi-yuan Hsu; Marshall M Joffe; Mary B Leonard; Dawei Xie; Jing Chen; Tom Greene; Bernard G Jaar; Patricia Kao; John W Kusek; J Richard Landis; James P Lash; Raymond R Townsend; Matthew R Weir; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  The Beck Depression Inventory as a screening device for major depression in renal dialysis patients.

Authors:  J L Craven; G M Rodin; C Littlefield
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.210

7.  Construct Validity of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Two Adult Populations: A Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Nguyen; Michael Moorhouse; Barbara Curbow; Juliette Christie; Kim Walsh-Childers; Sabrina Islam
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-05-20

8.  The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use.

Authors:  Namkee G Choi; Diana M Dinitto
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Hurling; Michael Catt; Marco De Boni; Bruce William Fairley; Tina Hurst; Peter Murray; Alannah Richardson; Jaspreet Singh Sodhi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  User profiles of a smartphone application to support drug adherence--experiences from the iNephro project.

Authors:  Stefan Becker; Andreas Kribben; Sven Meister; Clarissa Jonas Diamantidis; Nicole Unger; Anna Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Automated patient self-scheduling: case study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Woodcock; Aditi Sen; Jonathan Weiner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 7.942

2.  Understanding the Current Landscape of Health Literacy Interventions within Health Systems.

Authors:  Michael Truong; Susan H Fenton
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions.

Authors:  Noel Engels; Paul B van der Nat; Jet W Ankersmid; Janine C M Prick; Ellen Parent; Regina The; Asako Takahashi; Hans A J Bart; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Anne M Stiggelbout; Willem J W Bos; Marinus A van den Dorpel
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.585

4.  Design and Development of a Digital Counseling Program for Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Stephanie W Ong; Julia V Wong; Bourne L Auguste; Alexander G Logan; Robert P Nolan; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  Digital Solutions to Improve Medication Safety in CKD.

Authors:  Lee-Ann Wagner; Jeffrey C Fink
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Facilitators and Barriers to the Adoption of Telemedicine During the First Year of COVID-19: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katharine Heinemann; Clemens Kruse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Age and Racial Inequities in Telemedicine Internet Support Among Nephrology Outpatients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nwamaka D Eneanya; Taylor L Stallings; Jordan Shaffer; Michael E Konu; Jordana B Cohen; Sarah J Schrauben; Jonathan J Hogan; Deirdre L Sawinski
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2021-07-05

8.  A Qualitative Study of Facilitators and Barriers to Self-Management of CKD.

Authors:  Sarah J Schrauben; Eleanor Rivera; Claire Bocage; Whitney Eriksen; Sandra Amaral; Laura M Dember; Harold I Feldman; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-11-09

9.  Exploring agreement and feasibility between virtual home visits and in-person home visits for peritoneal dialysis patients-a paired study.

Authors:  Jin Chen; Bo Zheng; Lijuan Yin; Qin Zhou; Wenshu Liu; Pengli Li; Xiuxiu Zhao; Xiuling Chen; Yi Li; Hanlu Ding; Guisen Li
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 2.606

10.  Perceptions of Telehealth vs In-Person Visits Among Older Adults With Advanced Kidney Disease, Care Partners, and Clinicians.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Thalia Porteny; Julia M Perugini; Kristina M Gonzales; Kate E Aufort; Sarah K Levine; John B Wong; Tamara Isakova; Dena Rifkin; Elisa J Gordon; Ana Rossi; Susan Koch-Weser; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.