Masahiro Natsuaki1, Takeshi Morimoto, Yutaka Furukawa, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Kazushige Kadota, Kyohei Yamaji, Kenji Ando, Satoshi Shizuta, Hiroki Shiomi, Tomohisa Tada, Junichi Tazaki, Yoshihiro Kato, Mamoru Hayano, Mitsuru Abe, Takashi Tamura, Manabu Shirotani, Shinji Miki, Mitsuo Matsuda, Mamoru Takahashi, Katsuhisa Ishii, Masaru Tanaka, Takeshi Aoyama, Osamu Doi, Ryuichi Hattori, Masayuki Kato, Satoru Suwa, Akinori Takizawa, Yoshiki Takatsu, Eiji Shinoda, Hiroshi Eizawa, Teruki Takeda, Jong-Dae Lee, Moriaki Inoko, Hisao Ogawa, Shuichi Hamasaki, Minoru Horie, Ryuji Nohara, Hirofumi Kambara, Hisayoshi Fujiwara, Kazuaki Mitsudo, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, Toru Kita, Takeshi Kimura. 1. From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (M. Natsuaki, S. Shizuta, H.S., T. Tada, J.T., Y.K., M.H., T. Kimura); Division of Genera Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan (T.M.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan (Y.F., T. Kita); Division of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan (Y.N.); Division of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan (K.K., K.M.); Division of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan (K.Y., K.A., M. Nobuyoshi); Division of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan (M.A.); Division of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan (T. Tamura); Division of Cardiology, Nara Hospital, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, Nara, Japan (M.S.); Division of Cardiology, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Kyoto, Japan (S.M.); Division of Cardiology, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan (M.M.); Division of Cardiology, Shimabara Hospital, Kyoto, Japan (M. Takahashi); Division of Cardiology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan (K.I.); Division of Cardiology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan (M. Tanaka); Division of Cardiology, Shimada Municipal Hospital, Shimada, Japan (T.A., R.H.); Division of Cardiology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (O.D., H.K.); Division of Cardiology, Maizuru Kyosai Hospital, Maizuru, Japan (M.K.); Division of Cardiology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (S. Suwa); Division of Cardiology, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan (A.T.); Division of Cardiology, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan (Y.T., H.F.); Division of Cardiology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan (E.S.); Division of Cardiology, Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan (H.E.); Division of Cardiology, Koto Memorial Hospital
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late adverse events such as very late stent thrombosis (VLST) or late target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation have not been yet fully characterized at long term in comparison with those after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 13 058 consecutive patients undergoing first percutaneous coronary intervention in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2, 5078 patients were treated with SES only, and 5392 patients were treated with BMS only. During 7-year follow-up, VLST and late TLR beyond 1 year after SES implantation occurred constantly and without attenuation at 0.24% per year and at 2.0% per year, respectively. Cumulative 7-year incidence of VLST was significantly higher in the SES group than that in the BMS group (1.43% versus 0.68%, P<0.0001). However, there was no excess of all-cause death beyond 1 year in the SES group as compared with that in the BMS group (20.8% versus 19.6%, P=0.91). Cumulative incidences of late TLR (both overall and clinically driven) were also significantly higher in the SES group than in the BMS group (12.0% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001 and 8.5% versus 2.6%, P<0.0001, respectively), leading to late catch-up of the SES group to the BMS group regarding TLR through the entire 7-year follow-up (18.8% versus 25.2%, and 10.6% versus 10.2%, respectively). Clinical presentation as acute coronary syndrome was more common at the time of late SES TLR compared with early SES TLR (21.2% and 10.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Late catch-up phenomenon regarding stent thrombosis and TLR was significantly more pronounced with SES than that with BMS. This limitation should remain the target for improvements of DES technology.
BACKGROUND: Late adverse events such as very late stent thrombosis (VLST) or late target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after first-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) implantation have not been yet fully characterized at long term in comparison with those after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 13 058 consecutive patients undergoing first percutaneous coronary intervention in the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome study-Kyoto registry Cohort-2, 5078 patients were treated with SES only, and 5392 patients were treated with BMS only. During 7-year follow-up, VLST and late TLR beyond 1 year after SES implantation occurred constantly and without attenuation at 0.24% per year and at 2.0% per year, respectively. Cumulative 7-year incidence of VLST was significantly higher in the SES group than that in the BMS group (1.43% versus 0.68%, P<0.0001). However, there was no excess of all-cause death beyond 1 year in the SES group as compared with that in the BMS group (20.8% versus 19.6%, P=0.91). Cumulative incidences of late TLR (both overall and clinically driven) were also significantly higher in the SES group than in the BMS group (12.0% versus 4.1%, P<0.0001 and 8.5% versus 2.6%, P<0.0001, respectively), leading to late catch-up of the SES group to the BMS group regarding TLR through the entire 7-year follow-up (18.8% versus 25.2%, and 10.6% versus 10.2%, respectively). Clinical presentation as acute coronary syndrome was more common at the time of late SES TLR compared with early SES TLR (21.2% and 10.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Late catch-up phenomenon regarding stent thrombosis and TLR was significantly more pronounced with SES than that with BMS. This limitation should remain the target for improvements of DES technology.
Authors: Julio F Marchini; Wilton F Gomes; Bruno Moulin; Marco A Perin; Ludmilla A R R Oliveira; J Airton Arruda; Valter C Lima; Antonio A G Lima; Paulo R A Caramori; Cesar R Medeiros; Mauricio R Barbosa; Fabio S Brito; Expedito E Ribeiro; Pedro A Lemos Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2014-12
Authors: Robert H Habib; Kamellia R Dimitrova; Sanaa A Badour; Maroun B Yammine; Abdul-Karim M El-Hage-Sleiman; Darryl M Hoffman; Charles M Geller; Thomas A Schwann; Robert F Tranbaugh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 24.094