Literature DB >> 24549972

Detrimental effects of UV-B radiation in a xeroderma pigmentosum-variant cell line.

Kimberly N Herman1, Shannon Toffton, Scott D McCulloch.   

Abstract

DNA polymerase η (pol η), of the Y-family, is well known for its in vitro DNA lesion bypass ability. The most well-characterized lesion bypassed by this polymerase is the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) caused by ultraviolet (UV) light. Historically, cellular and whole-animal models for this area of research have been conducted using UV-C (λ=100-280 nm) owing to its ability to generate large quantities of CPDs and also the more structurally distorting 6-4 photoproduct. Although UV-C is useful as a laboratory tool, exposure to these wavelengths is generally very low owing to being filtered by stratospheric ozone. We are interested in the more environmentally relevant wavelength range of UV-B (λ=280-315 nm) for its role in causing cytotoxicity and mutagenesis. We evaluated these endpoints in both a normal human fibroblast control line and a Xeroderma pigmentosum variant cell line in which the POLH gene contains a truncating point mutation, leading to a nonfunctional polymerase. We demonstrate that UV-B has similar but less striking effects compared to UV-C in both its cytotoxic and its mutagenic effects. Analysis of the mutation spectra after a single dose of UV-B shows that a majority of mutations can be attributed to mutagenic bypass of dipyrimidine sequences. However, we do note additional types of mutations with UV-B that are not previously reported after UV-C exposure. We speculate that these differences are attributed to a change in the spectra of photoproduct lesions rather than other lesions caused by oxidative stress.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA polymerase η; mutagenesis; translesion synthesis; ultraviolet radiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24549972      PMCID: PMC4102177          DOI: 10.1002/em.21857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  36 in total

Review 1.  Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components.

Authors:  J L Ravanat; T Douki; J Cadet
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.252

2.  Common fluorescent sunlamps are an inappropriate substitute for sunlight.

Authors:  D B Brown; A E Peritz; D L Mitchell; S Chiarello; J Uitto; F P Gasparro
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Efficient and accurate replication in the presence of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine by DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  L Haracska; S L Yu; R E Johnson; L Prakash; S Prakash
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Error-prone lesion bypass by human DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  Y Zhang; F Yuan; X Wu; O Rechkoblit; J S Taylor; N E Geacintov; Z Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are responsible for the vast majority of mutations induced by UVB irradiation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Y H You; D H Lee; J H Yoon; S Nakajima; A Yasui; G P Pfeifer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Requirement of DNA polymerase eta for error-free bypass of UV-induced CC and TC photoproducts.

Authors:  S L Yu; R E Johnson; S Prakash; L Prakash
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Role of DNA polymerase eta in the UV mutation spectrum in human cells.

Authors:  Anne Stary; Patricia Kannouche; Alan R Lehmann; Alain Sarasin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Roles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerases Poleta and Polzeta in response to irradiation by simulated sunlight.

Authors:  Stanislav G Kozmin; Youri I Pavlov; Thomas A Kunkel; Evelyne Sage
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA damage responses protect xeroderma pigmentosum variant from UVC-induced clastogenesis.

Authors:  Marila Cordeiro-Stone; Alexandra Frank; Miriam Bryant; Ikechukwu Oguejiofor; Stephanie B Hatch; Lisa D McDaniel; William K Kaufmann
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Differential biologic effects of CPD and 6-4PP UV-induced DNA damage on the induction of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest.

Authors:  Hsin-Lung Lo; Satoshi Nakajima; Lisa Ma; Barbara Walter; Akira Yasui; Douglas W Ethell; Laurie B Owen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  4 in total

1.  Minimal detection of nuclear mutations in XP-V and normal cells treated with oxidative stress inducing agents.

Authors:  Kimberly N Herman; Shannon Toffton; Scott D McCulloch
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Whole-exome sequencing reveals the impact of UVA light mutagenesis in xeroderma pigmentosum variant human cells.

Authors:  Natália Cestari Moreno; Tiago Antonio de Souza; Camila Carrião Machado Garcia; Nathalia Quintero Ruiz; Camila Corradi; Ligia Pereira Castro; Veridiana Munford; Susan Ienne; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Carlos Frederico Martins Menck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Cytotoxicity and Mutagenicity of Narrowband UVB to Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Dylan J Buglewicz; Jacob T Mussallem; Alexis H Haskins; Cathy Su; Junko Maeda; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Cooperation and interplay between base and nucleotide excision repair pathways: From DNA lesions to proteins.

Authors:  Namrata Kumar; Natália C Moreno; Bruno C Feltes; Carlos Fm Menck; Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.771

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.