Literature DB >> 24548321

The maintenance of cross-domain associations in the episodic buffer.

Naomi Langerock1, Evie Vergauwe2, Pierre Barrouillet1.   

Abstract

The episodic buffer has been described as a structure of working memory capable of maintaining multimodal information in an integrated format. Although the role of the episodic buffer in binding features into objects has received considerable attention, several of its characteristics have remained rather underexplored. This is the case for its maintenance capacity limits and its separability from domain-specific maintenance buffers. The present study addressed these questions, making use of a complex span paradigm in which participants were asked to maintain cross-domain (i.e., verbal-spatial) associations. The 1st experiment showed that the capacity limit for these cross-domain associations proved to be lower than the capacity limit for single features, and did not exceed 3. Cross-domain associations and single features depended, however, to the same extent on attentional resources for their maintenance. The 2nd experiment showed that domain-specific (verbal or spatial) resources were not involved in the maintenance of cross-domain information, revealing a clear distinction between the episodic buffer and the domain-specific buffers. Overall, in line with the episodic buffer hypothesis, these findings support the existence of a central system of limited capacity for the maintenance of cross-domain information. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24548321     DOI: 10.1037/a0035783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  Are Episodic Buffer Processes Intact in ADHD? Experimental Evidence and Linkage with Hyperactive Behavior.

Authors:  Michael J Kofler; Jamie A Spiegel; Kristin E Austin; Lauren N Irwin; Elia F Soto; Dustin E Sarver
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2018-08

2.  What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Cross-modal working memory binding and L1-L2 word learning.

Authors:  Shinmin Wang; Richard J Allen; Shin-Yi Fang; Ping Li
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

4.  Boundary conditions for observing cognitive load effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-03

5.  Does the presence of more features in a bound representation in working memory require extra object-based attention?

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Fan Wu; Xueyi Wan; Mowei Shen; Zaifeng Gao
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-27

6.  The influences of working memory representations on long-range regression in text reading: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Teppei Tanaka; Masashi Sugimoto; Yuki Tanida; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Encode a Letter and Get Its Location for Free? Assessing Incidental Binding of Verbal and Spatial Features.

Authors:  Molly A Delooze; Naomi Langerock; Robin Macy; Evie Vergauwe; Candice C Morey
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.