Literature DB >> 2454652

Maternal serum unconjugated oestriol as an antenatal screening test for Down's syndrome.

N J Wald1, H S Cuckle, J W Densem, K Nanchahal, J A Canick, J E Haddow, G J Knight, G E Palomaki.   

Abstract

The median maternal serum unconjugated oestriol level between 13 and 27 weeks gestation in 77 pregnancies associated with Down's syndrome was lower than the median level in 385 unaffected control pregnancies matched for maternal age, gestational age, and duration of serum sample storage (P less than 0.001). The median level for the affected pregnancies was 73% of that in the controls. Low unconjugated oestriol levels can be used to detect fetal Down's syndrome; at cut-off levels selected to detect at least 35% of affected pregnancies, unconjugated serum oestriol was a better screening test than either maternal age or serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). The use of all three variables in combination to select women with a 1:250 or greater risk of a Down's syndrome term pregnancy would yield a 45% detection rate with a false-positive rate of 5.2%. The same detection rate using maternal age alone or using age and serum AFP in combination would yield higher false-positive rates, 15% and 9.8% respectively. The addition of unconjugated oestriol to a Down's syndrome screening programme would therefore be more efficient than the use of age and AFP alone; for a given detection rate fewer women would need an amniocentesis or, for a given percentage of women having an amniocentesis, more pregnancies with Down's syndrome would be detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2454652     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  19 in total

1.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  N Leporrier; M Herrou; P Leymarie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-24

2.  A maternal serum screen for trisomy 18: an extension of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  A J Staples; E F Robertson; E Ranieri; R G Ryall; E A Haan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Inhibin at 90: from discovery to clinical application, a historical review.

Authors:  Yogeshwar Makanji; Jie Zhu; Rama Mishra; Chris Holmquist; Winifred P S Wong; Neena B Schwartz; Kelly E Mayo; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Genetic aspects of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J M Connor
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Simplification of biochemical screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  H S Cuckle; J W Densem; N J Wald
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.

Authors:  N J Wald; H S Cuckle; J W Densem; K Nanchahal; P Royston; T Chard; J E Haddow; G J Knight; G E Palomaki; J A Canick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

Review 8.  Prenatal diagnosis of common genetic disorders.

Authors:  M D Crawfurd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988 Aug 20-27

Review 9.  New discoveries on the biology and detection of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Authors:  Laurence A Cole
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  The ethics of antenatal screening: lessons from Canute.

Authors:  Timothy M Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2009-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.