IMPORTANCE: Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges, termed B(I)RDs, have been described mainly in neonates, and their significance in adults remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of B(I)RDs in critically ill patients and investigate their association with seizures and outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the records of prospectively identified patients with B(I)RDs and patients serving as controls matched for age (±5 years) and primary diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prevalence of seizures during continuous electroencephalography and functional outcome, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale, were determined. RESULTS: We identified B(I)RDs in 20 patients (2%). The pattern most often consisted of very brief (1-3 seconds) runs of sharply contoured theta activity without obvious evolution. All patients with B(I)RDs had cerebral injury, and in cases with a single focal lesion (11 [55%]), B(I)RDs were localized in the same region in all but 2 cases (18%). Patients with B(I)RDs were more likely to have seizures during continuous electroencephalography than were patients without B(I)RDs (15 of 20 [75%] vs 10 of 40 [25%]; P < .001), and 9 patients with B(I)RDs (60%) had only subclinical seizures. Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges were identified before seizures in all but 1 case (93%) and ceased in all 12 cases (80%) in which seizures were controlled. Patients with B(I)RDs tended to have a worse outcome than controls (16 [80%] vs 25 [63%]); however, this finding was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges in critically ill patients are associated with a high prevalence (75%) of electrographic seizures and might serve as an early predictor of seizures during subsequent monitoring. A larger prospective study is needed to better understand their clinical and prognostic significance.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges, termed B(I)RDs, have been described mainly in neonates, and their significance in adults remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of B(I)RDs in critically illpatients and investigate their association with seizures and outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the records of prospectively identified patients with B(I)RDs and patients serving as controls matched for age (±5 years) and primary diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The prevalence of seizures during continuous electroencephalography and functional outcome, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale, were determined. RESULTS: We identified B(I)RDs in 20 patients (2%). The pattern most often consisted of very brief (1-3 seconds) runs of sharply contoured theta activity without obvious evolution. All patients with B(I)RDs had cerebral injury, and in cases with a single focal lesion (11 [55%]), B(I)RDs were localized in the same region in all but 2 cases (18%). Patients with B(I)RDs were more likely to have seizures during continuous electroencephalography than were patients without B(I)RDs (15 of 20 [75%] vs 10 of 40 [25%]; P < .001), and 9 patients with B(I)RDs (60%) had only subclinical seizures. Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges were identified before seizures in all but 1 case (93%) and ceased in all 12 cases (80%) in which seizures were controlled. Patients with B(I)RDs tended to have a worse outcome than controls (16 [80%] vs 25 [63%]); however, this finding was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges in critically illpatients are associated with a high prevalence (75%) of electrographic seizures and might serve as an early predictor of seizures during subsequent monitoring. A larger prospective study is needed to better understand their clinical and prognostic significance.
Authors: Aaron F Struck; Gamaleldin Osman; Nishi Rampal; Siddhartha Biswal; Benjamin Legros; Lawrence J Hirsch; M Brandon Westover; Nicolas Gaspard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Hoameng Ung; Kathryn A Davis; Drausin Wulsin; Joost Wagenaar; Emily Fox; John J McDonnell; Ned Patterson; Charles H Vite; Gregory Worrell; Brian Litt Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jong Woo Lee; Suzette LaRoche; Hyunmi Choi; Andres A Rodriguez Ruiz; Evan Fertig; Jeffrey M Politsky; Susan T Herman; Tobias Loddenkemper; Arnold J Sansevere; Pearce J Korb; Nicholas S Abend; Joshua L Goldstein; Saurabh R Sinha; Keith E Dombrowski; Eva K Ritzl; Michael B Westover; Jay R Gavvala; Elizabeth E Gerard; Sarah E Schmitt; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Kan Ding; Kevin F Haas; Richard Buchsbaum; Lawrence J Hirsch; Courtney J Wusthoff; Jennifer L Hopp; Cecil D Hahn Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Tanuwong Viarasilpa; Nicha Panyavachiraporn; Gamaleldin Osman; Christopher Parres; Panayiotis Varelas; Meredith Van Harn; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.210