Literature DB >> 24534914

Variability-based Garner interference for perceptual estimations but not for grasping.

Tzvi Ganel1, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Garner's speeded classification task has been used as an effective tool to probe holistic processing of object shape. This is achieved by comparing classification performance of a given object dimension between two experimental conditions. Worse performance in a "filtering" condition in which a second, irrelevant dimension of the same object varies on a trial-to-trial basis, compared to a "baseline" condition in which the irrelevant dimension is held constant, is labeled Garner interference, and indicates that the two dimensions are processed in a holistic manner. About a decade ago, we used Garner's task to provide evidence for different frames of processing mediating action and perception. Unlike perceptual estimations, visually guided grasping showed no Garner interference when subjects were asked to reach out and grasp an object along a given dimension. In other words, slower reaction times were observed in the filtering compared to the baseline condition only for perceptual estimates but not for grasping. In two experiments, we extend these findings to kinematic measures beyond simple reaction times. The results showed that Garner interference is also expressed in the variability of the response, with more variable within-subject performance in the filtering compared to the baseline condition for perceptual estimates but not for grasping. These findings provide converging evidence for the idea that, unlike perception, which processes objects holistically, visually guided action is performed in an analytic manner.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534914     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3867-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

Review 1.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

Authors:  Robert D Melara; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Grasping for parsimony: do some motor actions escape dorsal processing?

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Volker H Franz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Franziska Landgraf; Marko Paelecke; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

4.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle.

Authors:  Jerzy Jarmasz; Justin G Hollands
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2009-06

5.  Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Eran Chajut; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

7.  Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Object representations in visual memory: evidence from visual illusions.

Authors:  Asaf Ben-Shalom; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Scott A Holmes; Ali Mulla; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Visual control of action directed toward two-dimensional objects relies on holistic processing of object shape.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

2.  The highs and lows of object impossibility: effects of spatial frequency on holistic processing of impossible objects.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Galia Avidan; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

Review 3.  How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effect of force feedback delay on stiffness perception and grip force modulation during tool-mediated interaction with elastic force fields.

Authors:  Raz Leib; Amir Karniel; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Tzvi Ganel; Caitlin M Byrne; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.