Literature DB >> 24534743

U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II.

Howard Brody, Sarah E Leonard, Jing-Bao Nie, Paul Weindling.   

Abstract

In 1945-46, representatives of the U.S. government made similar discoveries in both Germany and Japan, unearthing evidence of unethical experiments on human beings that could be viewed as war crimes. The outcomes in the two defeated nations, however, were strikingly different. In Germany, the United States, influenced by the Canadian physician John Thompson, played a key role in bringing Nazi physicians to trial and publicizing their misdeeds. In Japan, the United States played an equally key role in concealing information about the biological warfare experiments and in securing immunity from prosecution for the perpetrators. The greater force of appeals to national security and wartime exigency help to explain these different outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534743      PMCID: PMC4487829          DOI: 10.1017/S0963180113000753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics        ISSN: 0963-1801            Impact factor:   1.284


  7 in total

1.  Learning to see: moral growth during medical training.

Authors:  J Andre
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The United States cover-up of Japanese wartime medical atrocities: complicity committed in the national interest and two proposals for contemporary action.

Authors:  Jing-Bao Nie
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  The West's dismissal of the Khabarovsk trial as 'communist propaganda': ideology, evidence and international bioethics.

Authors:  Jing-Bao Nie
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  The Nuremberg Code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights.

Authors:  E Shuster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Research and complicity: the case of Julius Hallervorden.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.

Authors:  E Shuster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Nazi doctors and Nuremberg: some moral lessons revisited.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  What Is the Good of It-Ethical Controls of Human Subject Health Research? : Curtin University Annual Ethics Lecture.

Authors:  Robert French
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 2.  Healing Without Waging War: Beyond Military Metaphors in Medicine and HIV Cure Research.

Authors:  Jing-Bao Nie; Adam Gilbertson; Malcolm de Roubaix; Ciara Staunton; Anton van Niekerk; Joseph D Tucker; Stuart Rennie
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  In the Shadow of Biological Warfare: Conspiracy Theories on the Origins of COVID-19 and Enhancing Global Governance of Biosafety as a Matter of Urgency.

Authors:  Jing-Bao Nie
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 1.352

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.