Literature DB >> 21693567

Research and complicity: the case of Julius Hallervorden.

Franklin G Miller1.   

Abstract

The charge of complicity has been raised in debates over the ethics of fetal tissue transplantation and embryonic stem cell research. However, the applicability of the concept of complicity to these types of research is neither clear nor uncontroversial. This article discusses the historical case of Julius Hallervorden, a distinguished German neuropathologist who conducted research on brains of mentally handicapped patients killed in the context of the Nazi 'euthanasia' programme. It is argued that this case constitutes a paradigm of complicity in research that is useful in assessing complicity in contemporary research ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21693567     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2011.044586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  [German neurology and neurologists during the Third Reich: brain research and "euthanasia"].

Authors:  M Martin; A Karenberg; H Fangerau
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  [German neurology and neurologists during the Third Reich: the aftermath].

Authors:  M Martin; H Fangerau; A Karenberg
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  U.S. responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II.

Authors:  Howard Brody; Sarah E Leonard; Jing-Bao Nie; Paul Weindling
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Renaming of Hallervorden-Spatz disease: the second man behind the name of the disease.

Authors:  Luca Voges; Andreas Kupsch
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.