Literature DB >> 24534734

From policy making to service use. Down's syndrome antenatal screening in England, France and the Netherlands.

Carine Vassy1, Sophia Rosman2, Bénédicte Rousseau3.   

Abstract

In industrialised countries, certain biomedical innovations have come into general use, but the ways they are used vary considerably. Prenatal screening techniques for Down's syndrome are a perfect example of this. In 2010, screening rates stood at 61% in England and 84% in France; the previous year the rate was 26% in the Netherlands. The objective of our research, which took place in these three countries between 2008 and 2011, was to explain these differences. In these countries, public authorities focus on women's free access to innovations and on receiving their informed consent. But other aspects of screening policy vary, as do the health systems in which they are implemented. Our study shows that the sociotechnical settings which vary from country to country affected the interactions during the consultations we observed and thus impacted the decision of whether or not to screen.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down's syndrome; England; France; Informed consent; Netherlands; Policy; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534734     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  [France and Great-Britain at the age of genomic medicine: new ethical challenges in reproductive medicine].

Authors:  Ruth Horn
Journal:  Med Sci (Paris)       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 0.818

2.  On prenatal diagnosis and the decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy in France: a clinical ethics study of unknown moral territories.

Authors:  Marie Gaille
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-09

3.  Down syndrome live births following assisted reproductive technology in Japan: a nationwide survey between 2007 and 2016.

Authors:  Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Namba; Shunsuke Tamaru; Akira Kuwahara; Haruhiko Sago; Osamu Ishihara; Yoshimasa Kamei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  The association of ethnic minority density with late entry into antenatal care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anke G Posthumus; Vera L N Schölmerich; Eric A P Steegers; Ichiro Kawachi; Semiha Denktaş
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A qualitative study looking at informed choice in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Hennie Boeije; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Gerard H A Visser; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Factors associated with utilization of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in mainland China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chuanlin Li; Leiyu Shi; Jiayan Huang; Xu Qian; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid A Peters; Kirsten M Heetkamp; Nicolette T C Ursem; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş; Maarten F C M Knapen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

9.  'We are all in the image of God': reproductive imaginaries and prenatal genetic testing in American Jewish communities.

Authors:  Faye Ginsburg; Rayna Rapp
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-07-06

10.  Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.

Authors:  A Kater-Kuipers; E M Bunnik; I D de Beaufort; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.