Literature DB >> 24534444

Using patient lists to add value to integrated data repositories.

Ted D Wade1, Pearlanne T Zelarney2, Richard C Hum2, Sylvia McGee2, Deborah H Batson3.   

Abstract

Patient lists are project-specific sets of patients that can be queried in integrated data repositories (IDR's). By allowing a set of patients to be an addition to the qualifying conditions of a query, returned results will refer to, and only to, that set of patients. We report a variety of use cases for such lists, including: restricting retrospective chart review to a defined set of patients; following a set of patients for practice management purposes; distributing "honest-brokered" (deidentified) data; adding phenotypes to biosamples; and enhancing the content of study or registry data. Among the capabilities needed to implement patient lists in an IDR are: capture of patient identifiers from a query and feedback of these into the IDR; the existence of a permanent internal identifier in the IDR that is mappable to external identifiers; the ability to add queryable attributes to the IDR; the ability to merge data from multiple queries; and suitable control over user access and de-identification of results. We implemented patient lists in a custom IDR of our own design. We reviewed capabilities of other published IDRs for focusing on sets of patients. The widely used i2b2 IDR platform has various ways to address patient sets, and it could be modified to add the low-overhead version of patient lists that we describe.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-repository; Honest broker; Integrated data repository; Meaningful use; Patient registry; i2b2

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24534444      PMCID: PMC4134416          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  19 in total

1.  Practices and perspectives on building integrated data repositories: results from a 2010 CTSA survey.

Authors:  Sandra L MacKenzie; Matt C Wyatt; Robert Schuff; Jessica D Tenenbaum; Nick Anderson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Strategies for maintaining patient privacy in i2b2.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Vivian Gainer; Michael Mendis; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Data integration and genomic medicine.

Authors:  Brenton Louie; Peter Mork; Fernando Martin-Sanchez; Alon Halevy; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Guidelines for the effective use of entity-attribute-value modeling for biomedical databases.

Authors:  Valentin Dinu; Prakash Nadkarni
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  A database de-identification framework to enable direct queries on medical data for secondary use.

Authors:  B S Erdal; J Liu; J Ding; J Chen; C B Marsh; J Kamal; B D Clymer
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.176

6.  Toward reuse of clinical data for research and quality improvement: the end of the beginning?

Authors:  Mark G Weiner; Peter J Embi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  A Dimensional Bus model for integrating clinical and research data.

Authors:  Ted D Wade; Richard C Hum; James R Murphy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  TRIAD: The Translational Research Informatics and Data Management Grid.

Authors:  P Payne; D Ervin; R Dhaval; T Borlawsky; A Lai
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  A multidisciplinary approach to honest broker services for tissue banks and clinical data: a pragmatic and practical model.

Authors:  Rajiv Dhir; Ashok A Patel; Sharon Winters; Michelle Bisceglia; Dennis Swanson; Roger Aamodt; Michael J Becich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Generic design of Web-based clinical databases.

Authors:  Jacob Anhøj
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Consensus-Based Approach for Harmonizing the OHDSI Common Data Model with HL7 FHIR.

Authors:  Guoqian Jiang; Richard C Kiefer; Deepak K Sharma; Eric Prud'hommeaux; Harold R Solbrig
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2017

2.  Establishing the role of honest broker: bridging the gap between protecting personal health data and clinical research efficiency.

Authors:  Hyo Joung Choi; Min Joung Lee; Chang-Min Choi; JaeHo Lee; Soo-Yong Shin; Yungman Lyu; Yu Rang Park; Soyoung Yoo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Evaluating the Efficacy of a Registry linked to a Consent to Re-Contact Program and Communication Strategies for Recruiting and Enrolling Participants into Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Flood-Grady; Virginia C Clark; Angie Bauer; Lauren Morelli; Patrick Horne; Janice L Krieger; David R Nelson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.