Carmen Quirós1, Ioana Patrascioiu2, Marga Giménez2, Irene Vinagre2, Mercè Vidal2, Margarita Jansà2, Ignacio Conget2. 1. Unidad de Diabetes, Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España. Electronic address: cmquiros@clinic.ub.es. 2. Unidad de Diabetes, Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) have available several specific features of these devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between real use of them and the degree of glycemic control in patients using this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four T1DM patients on CSII therapy with or without real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) were included. Data from 14 consecutive days were retrospectively collected using the therapy management software CareLink Personal/Pro(®) and HbA1c measurement performed at that period. The relationship between the frequency of usie of specific features of insulin pumps (non-sensor augmented or sensor-augmented) and glycemic control was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c in the group was 7.5 ± .8%. Mean daily number of boluses administered was 5.1 ± 1.8, with 75.4% of them being bolus wizards (BW). Daily number of boluses was significantly greater in patients with HbA1c <7.5% than in those with HbA1c>7.5% (5.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.6, P=.056). There was a trend to greater use of BW in patients with better control (82.8 ± 21.4% vs. 69.9 ± 29.1%, P=.106). HbA1c was lower in patients using CGM (n=8) as compared to those not using sensor-augmented pumps (7.6 ± .8 vs 7.1 ± .7, P=.067), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: More frequent use of BW appears to be associated to better metabolic control in patients with T1DM using pump therapy. In standard clinical practice, augmentation of insulin pump with CGM may be associated to improved glycemic control.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) have available several specific features of these devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between real use of them and the degree of glycemic control in patients using this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four T1DM patients on CSII therapy with or without real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) were included. Data from 14 consecutive days were retrospectively collected using the therapy management software CareLink Personal/Pro(®) and HbA1c measurement performed at that period. The relationship between the frequency of usie of specific features of insulin pumps (non-sensor augmented or sensor-augmented) and glycemic control was analyzed. RESULTS: Mean HbA1c in the group was 7.5 ± .8%. Mean daily number of boluses administered was 5.1 ± 1.8, with 75.4% of them being bolus wizards (BW). Daily number of boluses was significantly greater in patients with HbA1c <7.5% than in those with HbA1c>7.5% (5.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.6, P=.056). There was a trend to greater use of BW in patients with better control (82.8 ± 21.4% vs. 69.9 ± 29.1%, P=.106). HbA1c was lower in patients using CGM (n=8) as compared to those not using sensor-augmented pumps (7.6 ± .8 vs 7.1 ± .7, P=.067), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: More frequent use of BW appears to be associated to better metabolic control in patients with T1DM using pump therapy. In standard clinical practice, augmentation of insulin pump with CGM may be associated to improved glycemic control.
Keywords:
Control glucémico; Diabetes mellitus tipo 1; Glycemic control; Infusión subcutánea de insulina; Insulin infusion systems; Type 1 diabetes mellitus