| Literature DB >> 24533333 |
Viviana González Astudillo1, Sonia M Hernández2, Whitney M Kistler2, Shaun L Boone1, Erin K Lipp3, Sudip Shrestha1, Michael J Yabsley2.
Abstract
The prevalence of five avian haemoparasite groups was examined for effects on health and associations with extrinsic factors. Overall, 786 samples were examined from six sites in two Georgia (USA) watersheds, during breeding and non-breeding periods in 2010 and 2011. Among the four most commonly infected species, Haemoproteus prevalence was significantly higher in Northern Cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis) compared to Indigo Buntings (Passerina cyanea) and Tufted Titmice (Baeolophus bicolor) while prevalence in White-throated Sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis) was significantly higher than in Indigo Buntings. Higher prevalence of Plasmodium was noted in Tufted Titmice and Northern Cardinals. While Leucocytozoon prevalence was highest in White-throated Sparrows, Trypanosoma prevalence was highest in Tufted Titmice. Interesting differences in infection probabilities were noted between foraging guilds with Haemoproteus associated with low-middle level strata and birds in the middle-upper strata were more likely to be infected with Plasmodium and Trypanosoma. In contrast, ground-foraging birds were more likely to be infected with Leucocytozoon. Breeding season was correlated with higher polychromasia counts and higher prevalence of Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Trypanosoma. In addition, prevalence of infection with certain haemoparasite genera and packed cell volume (PCV) were different among host species. Body mass index was inversely correlated with prevalence of microfilaria infection but positively related to Haemoproteus infection. However, we found no relationship between PCV or polychromasia levels with haemoparasite infection. Molecular characterization of 61 samples revealed 19 unique Haemoproteus (n = 7) and Plasmodium (n = 12) haplotypes with numerous new host records. No differences were noted in haplotype diversity among birds with different migratory behaviors or foraging heights, thus additional studies are needed that incorporate molecular analysis, host biology, and vector biology into comprehensive models on parasite ecology. Detailed morphological examination of these parasites is also necessary to determine if closely related haplotypes represent single species or morphologically distinct, but closely related, haplotypes.Entities:
Keywords: Blood parasite; Body mass index; Breeding season; Haemoparasite; Hematology; Prevalence; Wild bird
Year: 2013 PMID: 24533333 PMCID: PMC3862535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2013.04.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Map of Georgia (USA) indicating the location of the six sampling sites for identifying haemoparasite infections of birds in the northern and southern regions of the state.
Characteristics of the five target species.
| Characteristics | Bird species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolina Wren ( | Indigo Bunting ( | Northern Cardinal ( | Tufted Titmouse ( | White-throated Sparrow ( | |
| Feeding guild | Ground | Low-mid | Low-mid | Mid-upper | Ground |
| Migratory status | Resident | Migratory | Resident | Resident | Migratory |
Note that resident birds can undergo local or regional movements whereas the two migratory species undergo long-distance movements between seasons.
Haemoparasite results from five target species sampled in two regions of Georgia.
| Parasite | Bird species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolina Wren ( | Indigo Bunting ( | Northern Cardinal ( | Tufted Titmouse ( | White-throated Sparrow ( | |
| Haemoproteus | 0 | 8 (14)a | 55 (39)b | 8 (16)a | 29 (30)b |
| Plasmodium | 0 | 3 (5)b | 18 (13)a,b | 10 (20)a | 7 (7)b |
| Leucocytozoon | 0 | 0 | 7 (5)b | 2 (4)b | 15 (16)a |
| Microfilaria | 0 | 0 | 2 (1) | 1 (2) | 6 (6) |
| Trypanosoma | 0 | 1 (2)b | 5 (4)b | 8 (16)a | 2 (2)b |
Different letters, a, b, c and d, indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in prevalence for the different haemoparasites.
Haemoparasite results from fifty non-target bird species sampled in Georgia.
| Bird species | Parasite species | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfilaria | |||||||
| Acadian Flycatcher | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 (100) | |
| American Goldfinch | 8 | 1 (13) | 1 (13) | 1 (13) | – | 1 (13) | |
| American Robin | 5 | – | 1 (20) | – | – | 1 (20) | |
| Brown-headed Cowbird | 26 | 1 (4) | – | 1 (4) | 2 (8) | – | |
| Blue Grosbeak | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Blue Jay | 13 | – | 2 (15) | – | – | – | |
| Brown Thrasher | 30 | 4 (13) | 2 7) | – | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | |
| Carolina Chickadee | 11 | 5 (45) | 1 (9) | – | – | – | |
| Chipping Sparrow | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Common Ground-Dove | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Common Yellowthroat | 7 | 2 (29) | – | – | – | – | |
| Downy Woodpecker | 2 | – | 1 (50) | – | – | – | |
| Eastern Bluebird | 3 | 1 (33) | – | – | – | 1 (33) | |
| Eastern Phoebe | 18 | – | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | – | – | |
| Eastern Towhee | 18 | 3 (6) | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | 1 (6) | – | |
| Eastern Wood-Pewee | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| European Starling | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Field Sparrow | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Fox Sparrow | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Great Crested Flycatcher | 3 | – | – | – | 1 (33) | – | |
| Gray Catbird | 7 | – | – | – | – | 1 (14) | |
| Hermit Thrush | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| House Finch | 13 | – | – | – | 1 (8) | – | |
| House Sparrow | 69 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 3 (4) | – | – | |
| Hooded Warbler | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Magnolia Warbler | 5 | – | 1 (20) | – | – | – | |
| Myrtle Warbler | 11 | 3 (27) | – | – | 4 (36) | – | |
| Northern Mockingbird | 17 | 6 (35) | – | – | – | – | |
| Northern Parula | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Northern Waterthrush | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Prothonotary Warbler | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Red-bellied Woodpecker | 8 | 3 (38) | 2 (25) | – | – | – | |
| Ruby-crowned Kinglet | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Red-eyed Vireo | 1 | 1 (100) | – | – | – | – | |
| Rock Pigeon | 1 | 1 (100) | – | – | – | – | |
| Redwinged Blackbird | 5 | 1 (20) | 2 (40) | – | – | – | |
| Savannah Sparrow | 14 | 2 (14) | 1 (7) | – | – | – | |
| Slate-colored Junco | 5 | – | – | 2 (40) | 1 (20) | – | |
| Song Sparrow | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Sharp-shinned Hawk | 3 | 1 (33) | – | – | – | – | |
| Summer Tanager | 3 | 3 (100) | 1 (33) | – | – | – | |
| Swamp Sparrow | 26 | 5 (19) | 2 (8) | – | – | – | |
| Tennessee Warbler | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| White-eyed Vireo | 5 | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | – | – | – | |
| Wood Thrush | 2 | 1 (50) | – | 1 (50) | – | – | |
| Western Palm Warbler | 3 | 1 (33) | – | – | – | – | |
| Yellow-breasted Chat | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Yellow-bellied Sapsucker | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | |
All tested birds were negative.
Association of selected factors and infection with haemoparasites in wild birds from Georgia.
| Factor | Parasite species | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfilaria | |||||||
| Season | NonBreeding | 261 | 52 (20)a | 17 (7)a | 13 (5) | 7 (3) | 5 (2)a |
| Breeding | 120 | 48 (40)b | 21 (18)b | 11 (9) | 2 (2) | 11 (9)b | |
| Feeding guild | Ground | 129 | 29 (23)a,b | 7 (5)a | 15 (12)a | 6 (5) | 2 (2)a |
| Low-middle | 201 | 63 (31)b | 21 (11)a,b | 7 (4)b | 2 (1) | 6 (3)a | |
| Middle-upper | 51 | 8 (16)a | 10 (20)b | 2 (4)b | 1 (2) | 8 (16)b | |
| Migration status | Resident | 225 | 63 (28) | 27 (12) | 9 (4)a | 3 (1) | 13 (6) |
| Migrant | 154 | 27 (24) | 10 (7) | 15 (10)b | 6 (4) | 2 (2) | |
| Location | North | 244 | 57 (23) | 21 (9) | 18 (7) | 7 (3) | 15 (6)a |
| South | 137 | 43 (31) | 17 (12) | 6 (4) | 2 (2) | 1 (1)b | |
Different letters, a, b, c and d, indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) in prevalence for the different haemoparasites among the various factors included in the study.
Fig. 2Average percent cell volume (PCV) values for five target bird species from Georgia (USA). Different letters indicate significant differences between bird species (p < 0.05).
Overall predictors for haemoparasite infections in five target species.
| Parasite | Effect | d | Wald Chi-Square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | 3 | 12.1 | 0.0071 | |
| Breeding season | 1 | 9.6 | 0.0019 | |
| Breeding season | 1 | 9.2 | 0.0024 | |
| Species | 3 | 9.2 | 0.0272 | |
| Species | 3 | 11.5 | 0.0092 | |
| Location | 1 | 4.9 | 0.0274 | |
| Breeding season | 1 | 10.4 | 0.0013 | |
Odds of birds being infected with selected haemoparasites.
| Parasite | Comparison 1 | Comparison 2 | Estimate | SE | Odds ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breeding | Non-breeding | 0.8220 | 0.2650 | 3.10 | 0.0019 | 2.275 | |
| Breeding | Non-breeding | 1.0586 | 0.3490 | 3.03 | 0.0024 | 2.882 | |
| Northern Cardinal | Tufted Titmouse | 0.2318 | 0.8189 | 0.28 | 0.9568 | 1.261 | |
| Northern Cardinal | White-throated Sparrow | −1.2805 | 0.4788 | −2.67 | 0.0205 | 0.278 | |
| Tufted Titmouse | White-throated Sparrow | −1.5122 | 0.7742 | −1.95 | 0.1240 | 0.220 | |
| Indigo Bunting | Northern Cardinal | −0.1286 | 1.1463 | −0.11 | 0.9995 | 0.879 | |
| Indigo Bunting | Tufted Titmouse | −1.9636 | 1.1510 | −1.71 | 0.3204 | 0.140 | |
| Indigo Bunting | White-throated Sparrow | 0.2534 | 1.2918 | 0.20 | 0.9973 | 1.288 | |
| Northern Cardinal | Tufted Titmouse | −1.8350 | 0.6696 | −2.74 | 0.0312 | 0.160 | |
| Northern Cardinal | White-throated Sparrow | 0.3820 | 0.8906 | 0.43 | 0.9735 | 1.465 | |
| Tufted Titmouse | White-throated Sparrow | 2.2170 | 0.8398 | 2.64 | 0.0413 | 9.180 | |
| North GA | South GA | 2.3534 | 1.0673 | 2.21 | 0.0274 | 10.522 | |
| Breeding | Non-breeding | 2.0026 | 0.6214 | 3.22 | 0.0013 | 7.408 |
Occurrence of single and multiple infections in the four target species infected with at least one species of haemoparasite.
| Number infected (% of infected birds) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indigo Bunting | Northern Cardinal | Tufted Titmouse | White-throated Sparrow | |
| 8 (67) | 39 (57) | 5 (24) | 18 (41) | |
| 3 (25) | 7 (10) | 4 (19) | 2 (5) | |
| 0 | 3 (4) | 2 (10) | 9 (20) | |
| Microfilaria only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (7) |
| 1 (8) | 3 (4) | 2 (10) | 0 | |
| 0 | 9 (13) | 1 (5) | 4 (9) | |
| 0 | 4 (6) | 0 | 4 (9) | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (5) | |
| 0 | 2 (3) | 2 (10) | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 (1) | 1 (5) | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 4 (19) | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) | |
| 0 | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | |
| All five parasites | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2) |
Number of birds infected with at least one parasite type.
Fig. 3Minimum spanning network for Haemoproteus and Plasmodium mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b haplotypes detected in four species of passerines from Georgia (USA). Circles are drawn proportional to the frequency at which haplotypes were observed. Color represents the host species from which haplotypes originated: red for Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), blue for Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea), yellow for White-throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis), and grey for Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor). A single mutation separates nodes unless explicitly indicated by number. Letters within each node refer to Table 8 which indicates the haplotype name, sampling location, and other factors associated with hosts.
Data on sampling location, foraging guild, and migratory status of the birds infected with the seven unique Haemoproteus haplotypes and 12 Plasmodium haplotypes.
| Parasite | Haplotypes | Species | Sampling location | Migratory status | Foraging height | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North | South | Migratory | Resident | Ground | Low-mid | Mid-upper | |||||
| A | ZONALB01/GA/2011 | 10 | ZONALB | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| B | ZONALB02/GA/2011 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| C | ZONALB03/GA/2011 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| D | SAIMEX01 | 10 | BAEBIC, CARCAR | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 2 | |
| E | ZONALB04/GA/2011 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| F | ZONALB05/GA/2011 | 2 | ZONALB | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| G | ZONALB06/GA/2011 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 26 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 2 | |||
| H | SEIARU01 | 7 | CARCAR | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
| I | BAEBIC04/GA/2011 | 4 | BAEBIC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| J | BT7 | 3 | ZONALB | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| K | TUMIG03 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| L | PADOM11 | 11 | CARCAR, PASCYA | 3 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 0 | |
| M | CARCAR02/GA/2011 | 1 | CARCAR | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| N | WW7 | 4 | CARCAR | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| O | PASCYA01/GA/2011 | 1 | PASCYA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| P | PASCYA02/GA/2011 | 1 | PASCYA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Q | CARCAR03/GA/2011 | 1 | CARCAR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| R | CATUST05 | 1 | ZONALB | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| S | PASCYA03/GA/2011 | 1 | PASCYA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 36 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 21 | 5 | 27 | 4 | |||
These letters refer to Fig. 3 to enable reader to visualize relationships of haplotypes. With the exception of haplotype H, all other haplotypes detected in this study were new host records.
These haplotypes had been previously reported in the MalAvi database (Bensch et al., 2009) which is available online at http://mbio-serv2.mbioekol.lu.se/Malavi/.
CARCAR, Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis); PASCYA, Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea); ZONALB, White-throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis); and BAEBIC, Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor).