| Literature DB >> 31417845 |
Tierra C Groff1, Teresa J Lorenz2, Rocio Crespo3, Tatjana Iezhova4, Gediminas Valkiūnas4, Ravinder N M Sehgal1.
Abstract
A juvenile White-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus) fitted with a radio tag was located dead at approximately 22-days post-fledging in Yakima county in central Washington in July 2015. Postmortem examination revealed an enlarged liver and spleen plus evidence of iron sequestration. Microscopic examination observed young gametocytes within the cytoplasm of erythrocytes, and exo-erythrocytic meronts within the cytoplasm of capillary endothelial cells, hepatocytes, and myocytes, and free in the tissues. These attributes implicated a haemosporidian infection that likely resulted in mortality. Subsequent sampling results of local woodpecker species in the same area during the breeding season in June-July 2016 and May-July 2017 showed other individuals infected with Haemoproteus parasites. Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), sequencing, and microscopic analyses for avian haemosporidians revealed infections with Haemoproteus velans (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae). This parasite was characterized molecularly and morphologically. This is the first report of a haemosporidian infection in a White-headed woodpecker anywhere in its range, and the first reported suspected mortality from haemoproteosis for a woodpecker (Piciformes, Picidae). The use of radio-tagged birds is an asset in wildlife haemosporidian studies because the effect of the pathogen can be monitored in real time. Additionally, this methodology provides opportunities to collect fresh material for microscopic and histological examination from wild birds that have died from natural causes.Entities:
Keywords: Haemoproteus velans; Molecular and morphological characterization; Mortality; Picidae; Radio-tagging; White-headed woodpecker
Year: 2019 PMID: 31417845 PMCID: PMC6690637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.07.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Documented North American haemosporidian infections in Piciformes (1937–2018)a.
| Species | No. examined | No. infected | Infected with | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 198 | 108 | 22 | 78 | 8 | |
| 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 70 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 140 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0 | |
| 44 | 26 | 3 | 23 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 243 | 64 | 0 | 63 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 39 | 13 | 1 | 11 | 1 | |
| Total | 792 | 234 | 27 | 197 | 10 |
| Overall prevalence (%) | 29.5 | 3.4 | 24.9 | 1.2 |
Coatney and Roudabush (1937); Coatney (1938); Huff (1939); Herman (1944); Bennett and Fallis (1960); Collins et al., (1966); Khan and Fallis (1971); Greiner et al., 1975, Greiner et al., 1977; Pung et al., 2000; Ricklefs and Fallon (2002); Schrader et al., (2003); Martinsen et al., (2008); Astudillo et al., (2013); Medeiros et al., (2014), 2015; Ellis et al., (2015); Walther et al., (2016); Smith et al., (2018).
Fig. 1Histological section of liver tissue of naturally infected White-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus). Note clumps of numerous hemozoin granules (arrows), which are remnants of hemozoin developing in gametocytes of Haemoproteus parasites. Magnification x10.
Fig. 2Skeletal muscle tissue showing megalomeronts of Haemoproteus velans. Note numerous developing cytomeres (arrowhead) and capsular-like wall around the parasite (arrow). Magnification x20.
Fig. 3Haemoproteus velans (lineage NOFL1) from the blood of the Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus): a, b - young gametocytes; c-h - macrogametocytes; i-l - microgametocytes. Long simple arrows – nuclei of parasites. Simple arrowhead – pigment granules. Triangle arrowheads – volutin granules. Short simple wide arrow – unfilled space in poles of erythrocytes. Giemsa-stained thin blood films. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Morphometry of host cells and mature gametocytes of Haemoproteus velans from the blood of the Northern Flicker Colaptes auratus.
| Feature | Measurements (μm) |
|---|---|
| Uninfected erythrocyte | |
| Length | 12.6–14.6 (13.5 ± 0.6) |
| Width | 6.3–7.5 (6.7 ± 0.3) |
| Area | 65.8–77.9 (71.7 ± 3.3) |
| Uninfected erythrocyte nucleus | |
| Length | 5.3–6.6 (6.1 ± 0.3) |
| Width | 1.9–2.6 (2.2 ± 0.2) |
| Area | 9.0–13.5 (11.5 ± 1.3) |
| Macrogametocyte | |
| Infected erythrocyte | |
| Length | 14.5–17.8 (15.9 ± 0.8) |
| Width | 5.9–7.2 (6.6 ± 0.4) |
| Area | 78.7–97.4 (85.0 ± 5.4) |
| Infected erythrocyte nucleus | |
| Length | 4.9–6.7 (5.9 ± 0.4) |
| Width | 1.9–2.4 (2.2 ± 0.2) |
| Area | 8.1–12.9 (11.2 ± 1.1) |
| Gametocyte | |
| Length | 24.1–27.5 (25.9 ± 1.0) |
| Width | 1.9–3.7 (2.6 ± 0.4) |
| Area | 57.7–77.6 (65.5 ± 5.4) |
| Gametocyte nucleus | |
| Length | 2.8–4.9 (4.0 ± 0.6) |
| Width | 1.7–3.5 (2.3 ± 0.5) |
| Area | 5.9–11.6 (8.1 ± 1.4) |
| Pigment granules | 27.0–42.0 (34.9 ± 4.3) |
| NDR | 0.4–0.9 (0.8 ± 0.1) |
| Microgametocyte | |
| Infected erythrocyte | |
| Length | 14.4–17.1 (15.4 ± 0.7) |
| Width | 5.8–7.3 (6.6 ± 0.3) |
| Area | 72.6–95.8 (83.8 ± 5.2) |
| Infected erythrocyte nucleus | |
| Length | 4.9–6.6 (5.7 ± 0.4) |
| Width | 1.7–2.6 (2.3 ± 0.2) |
| Area | 9.3–12.7 (11.0 ± 1.0) |
| Gametocyte | |
| Length | 22.3–28.8 (25.0 ± 1.7) |
| Width | 2.3–3.1 (2.8 ± 0.2) |
| Area | 50.7–72.0 (62.1 ± 5.4) |
| Gametocyte nucleus | |
| Length | 6.7–9.5 (8.3 ± 1.0) |
| Width | 2.3–3.1 (2.6 ± 0.3) |
| Area | 14.5–24.9 (19.6 ± 3.8) |
| Pigment granules | 19.0–36.0 (27.5 ± 4.8) |
| NDR | 0.6–0.8 (0.7 ± 0.1) |
Measurements (n = 21) are given in micrometers. Minimum and maximum values are provided, followed in parentheses by the arithmetic mean and standard deviation.
NDR = nucleus displacement ration according to Bennett and Campbell (1972).
Nuclei of microgametocytes are markedly diffuse and difficult to measure; outline of the nuclei was well seen and measured in 9 microgametocytes.
Fig. 4Consensus tree displaying Haemoproteus velans phylogenetic relationships as predicted by Maximum-likelihood inference, using GTR + I+Γ substitution model in PAUP* v.4.0a.b161. Maximum-likelihood bootstrap values > 70 are indicated. Lineages detected in the current study are indicated by red boxes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)