I Cerón1, P Muñoz2, M Marín3, A Segado4, J Roda5, M Valerio6, E Bouza7. 1. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 2. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Department of Medicine, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain CIBERES, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain pmunoz@micro.hggm.es. 3. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain CIBERES, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 6. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. 7. Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain Department of Medicine, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain CIBERES, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Enterococcus spp. account for 10% of infective endocarditis (IE). Although daptomycin is a bactericidal drug with in vitro activity against Enterococcus, there is little experience of its use in IE. We analysed the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal IE (EIE). METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study comparing the efficacy of daptomycin versus ampicillin/ceftriaxone versus conventional antibiotic regimens (ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin) in EIE. RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2011, 6 patients with EIE treated with daptomycin monotherapy were compared with 21 patients treated with ampicillin/ceftriaxone and 5 patients treated with ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin. The three groups had similar epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Daptomycin indications were allergy to β-lactams (n = 3), therapy simplification (n = 2), renal failure (n = 2) and Enterococcus faecium resistant to ampicillin/gentamicin (n = 1). Daptomycin MICs ranged from 1 to 2 mg/L and the doses were 6-10 mg/kg/day intravenously. Daptomycin patients had longer duration of bacteraemia (6 versus 1 day, P < 0.01) and greater need of therapy switch due to complications (66.7% versus 0%, P < 0.01). There were no differences regarding duration of hospital stay or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin-treated patients more frequently required a therapeutic change due to worse microbiological and clinical response, although mortality was not increased. Our findings do not support the use of daptomycin as single therapy in the treatment of EIE. Its role in combined strategies should be further investigated.
OBJECTIVES:Enterococcus spp. account for 10% of infective endocarditis (IE). Although daptomycin is a bactericidal drug with in vitro activity against Enterococcus, there is little experience of its use in IE. We analysed the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal IE (EIE). METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study comparing the efficacy of daptomycin versus ampicillin/ceftriaxone versus conventional antibiotic regimens (ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin) in EIE. RESULTS: From January 2007 to December 2011, 6 patients with EIE treated with daptomycin monotherapy were compared with 21 patients treated with ampicillin/ceftriaxone and 5 patients treated with ampicillin or vancomycin ± gentamicin. The three groups had similar epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Daptomycin indications were allergy to β-lactams (n = 3), therapy simplification (n = 2), renal failure (n = 2) and Enterococcus faecium resistant to ampicillin/gentamicin (n = 1). Daptomycin MICs ranged from 1 to 2 mg/L and the doses were 6-10 mg/kg/day intravenously. Daptomycinpatients had longer duration of bacteraemia (6 versus 1 day, P < 0.01) and greater need of therapy switch due to complications (66.7% versus 0%, P < 0.01). There were no differences regarding duration of hospital stay or mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Daptomycin-treated patients more frequently required a therapeutic change due to worse microbiological and clinical response, although mortality was not increased. Our findings do not support the use of daptomycin as single therapy in the treatment of EIE. Its role in combined strategies should be further investigated.
Authors: Emily L Heil; Jacqueline T Bork; Sarah A Schmalzle; Michael Kleinberg; Anupama Kewalramani; Bruce L Gilliam; Ulrike K Buchwald Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2016-07-23 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Laura Herrera-Hidalgo; Arístides de Alarcón; Luis E López-Cortes; Rafael Luque-Márquez; Luis F López-Cortes; Alicia Gutiérrez-Valencia; María V Gil-Navarro Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2020-09-30