PURPOSE: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is emerging as an important cardiovascular prognostic factor in addition to average blood pressure level. While there have been some suggestions for the determinants of the blood pressure variability, little is known about the relationship between the blood pressure variability and health-related quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six men and women with mild hypertension were enrolled from local health centers in Republic of Korea, from April to October 2009. They self-monitored their blood pressure twice daily for 8 weeks. Pharmacological treatment was not changed during the period. Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of blood pressure measurements were calculated as indices of BPV. Measurements of QOL were done at initial and at 8-week follow-up visits. RESULTS: Study subjects had gender ratio of 39:41 (male:female) and the mean age was 64±10 years. The mean home blood pressure's at week 4 and 8 did not differ from baseline. Total score of QOL at follow-up visit and change of QOL among two measurements were negatively correlated to BPV indices, i.e., higher QOL was associated with lower BPV. This finding persisted after adjustment for age, gender and the number of antihypertensive agents. Among dimensions of QOL, physical, mental and hypertension-related dimensions were associated particularly with BPV. CONCLUSION: QOL may be a significant determinant of BPV. Improvement of QOL may lead to favorable changes in BPV.
PURPOSE: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is emerging as an important cardiovascular prognostic factor in addition to average blood pressure level. While there have been some suggestions for the determinants of the blood pressure variability, little is known about the relationship between the blood pressure variability and health-related quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six men and women with mild hypertension were enrolled from local health centers in Republic of Korea, from April to October 2009. They self-monitored their blood pressure twice daily for 8 weeks. Pharmacological treatment was not changed during the period. Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of blood pressure measurements were calculated as indices of BPV. Measurements of QOL were done at initial and at 8-week follow-up visits. RESULTS: Study subjects had gender ratio of 39:41 (male:female) and the mean age was 64±10 years. The mean home blood pressure's at week 4 and 8 did not differ from baseline. Total score of QOL at follow-up visit and change of QOL among two measurements were negatively correlated to BPV indices, i.e., higher QOL was associated with lower BPV. This finding persisted after adjustment for age, gender and the number of antihypertensive agents. Among dimensions of QOL, physical, mental and hypertension-related dimensions were associated particularly with BPV. CONCLUSION: QOL may be a significant determinant of BPV. Improvement of QOL may lead to favorable changes in BPV.
Entities:
Keywords:
Blood pressure variability; hypertension; quality of life
Authors: Gianluca Serafini; Maurizio Pompili; Marco Innamorati; Giulia Iacorossi; Ilaria Cuomo; Mariarosaria Della Vista; David Lester; Luciano De Biase; Paolo Girardi; Roberto Tatarelli Journal: Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010
Authors: Päivi E Korhonen; Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä; Hannu Kautiainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Kantola Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: A H van den Meiracker; A J Man in 't Veld; H J van Eck; G J Wenting; M A Schalekamp Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 1988-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Jin-Woo Han; Han Choi; Yo-Han Jeon; Chong-Hyeon Yoon; Jong-Min Woo; Won Kim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andreas Voss; Martin Bogdanski; Mario Walther; Bernd Langohr; Reyk Albrecht; Georg Seifert; Mike Sandbothe Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-07-18