Literature DB >> 21747047

Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the Natrilix SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in the reduction of systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients (X-CELLENT) study.

Yi Zhang1, Davide Agnoletti, Michel E Safar, Jacques Blacher.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of different antihypertensive agents on blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) and the underlying mechanism, we analyzed the ambulatory BP monitoring data of 577 patients before and after 3-month antihypertensive treatment, in the Natrilix SR Versus Candesartan and Amlodipine in the Reduction of Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients (X-CELLENT) Study, a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 4 parallel treatment arms (placebo, candesartan, indapamide sustained release, and amlodipine). Within-subject mean and SD of 24-hour BP, weighted by time interval between consecutive readings, were calculated in 3 time frames (daytime, nighttime, and 24 hours) to evaluate BP and BPV. The mean 24-hour heart rate (HR) and HR variability were calculated with the same algorithms. We found that the 3 antihypertensive drugs had a similar BP-lowering effect (P<0.001 for all), but amlodipine (P<0.007) and indapamide sustained release (P<0.04) were the only agents associated with a significantly decreased BPV after 3-month treatment. On the other hand, the major determinants of BPV at baseline were age, mean BP, and the corresponding HR variability. However, the reduction in BPV by amlodipine was significantly associated with the reduction in BP (P<0.006) and the reduction in HR variability (P<0.02), whereas the corresponding reduction by indapamide sustained release was only associated with the reduction in HR variability at night (P=0.004). In summary, 3-month amlodipine or indapamide sustained release treatment was associated with a significant reduction in BPV, and the mechanism of those reductions was possibly attributable to lowering BP or ameliorating the autonomic nervous system regulation or both. The combination of the 2 agents might help to optimize such properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21747047     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.174383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  38 in total

Review 1.  Is It Daily, Monthly, or Yearly Blood Pressure Variability that Enhances Cardiovascular Risk?

Authors:  Eamon Dolan; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Increases Over a 10-Year Follow-Up in Community-Dwelling Older People.

Authors:  Claire McDonald; Mark S Pearce; Joanna Wincenciak; Simon R J Kerr; Julia L Newton
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Hemodynamic Determinants of the Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability: Differential Roles of Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflection.

Authors:  Pai-Feng Hsu; Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Edward G Lakatta; Frank C P Yin; Pesus Chou; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 5.  Regulatory Roles of Fluctuation-Driven Mechanotransduction in Cell Function.

Authors:  Béla Suki; Harikrishnan Parameswaran; Jasmin Imsirovic; Erzsébet Bartolák-Suki
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-09

6.  From Clinical Considerations to Theory - Blood Pressure Variability Profiles and Patterns.

Authors:  Diana E Cretu; Cristina Japie; Emma Weiss; Magda Bunea; Sabina Frunza; Ana Maria Daraban; Daniela Bartos; Elisabeta Badila
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2016-06

Review 7.  Olmesartan vs. ramipril in elderly hypertensive patients: review of data from two published randomized, double-blind studies.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ettore Malacco; Jean-Michel Mallion; Paolo Fabrizzi; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2014-01-17

Review 8.  Blood pressure variability, cardiovascular risk, and risk for renal disease progression.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan E Ochoa; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Genetic and environmental influences on blood pressure variability: a study in twins.

Authors:  Xiaojing Xu; Xiuhua Ding; Xinyan Zhang; Shaoyong Su; Frank A Treiber; Robert Vlietinck; Robert Fagard; Catherine Derom; Marij Gielen; Ruth J F Loos; Harold Snieder; Xiaoling Wang
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Pediatric ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: diagnosis of hypertension.

Authors:  Abanti Chaudhuri
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.